Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Payment no show from CSA


jadeybags
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4377 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Following on from Stressedandfed ups post on another thread, I was saying how I am still waiting for this months CSA payment.

Going by the last 3 months payments, it was due on monday just gone. It's now friday.

So may be monday now, but what I want to know is, that will be 5 weeks from last payment, which has happened numerous times before, yet i'll still only get a months payment?

Does that make sense? My ex is supposed to pay 67 pounds per week for 2. Now am I right in thinking I am frequently being short changed in that case. Or am I seeing it wrong? I did mention this to CSA last yr some time, & they fobbed me off.

But in my eyes I am probably missing a good few weeks each year of maintenance? Happens 3 or 4 times a year this does.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had to do an SAR to get all the information they held on me, and after going through it transpired that they regularly withheld payments, on one occasion for 5 months.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eventually, but no chance of interest or even a sorry for the hold up and I just didn't have the energy to keep complaining about it.

 

I'm still owed arrears from someone since between them DWP and CSA also seriously messed up and 'forgot' to make deductions from my ex's benefits, but just kept passing the buck between them. I was relieved when my daughter turned 18 and I didn't have to deal with them any more, and I'm certainly not going to chase my ex for the money since it wasn't his fault either.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a search of their website and see if it tells you, if not adapt the SAR template and send that.

 

Sorry I can't be more precise - it was about 5 years ago that I did this.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When the CSA finally started collecting from my ex I had to start another battle with them to get them to release it! For some obscure reason they had me listed as on benefits and were redirecting it to the Secretary of State! Then they had the audacity to tell me they 'might' be able to get it back for me!!

 

4 years on I still have to phone every month to make them release the money, and its getting a few days later every month!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Geez they're a pain aren't they! And they want to start charging people for this 'service'??? What a joke.

Similar happened to me in the past, he got into arrears back when I WAS on benefits & I didn't see a penny of it back then, soon as I started working & they had set up payments out his wages, after about 2 months they started paying the arrears to the government & there was none left for me!

Turned out they weren't supposed to do that, they were supposed to pay me THEN the government if there was any left.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good question, I think it's supposed to be paid weekly, I mean, that's the original amount that was set, 67 per week. But he does get paid monthly, so it makes sense that I would get it monthly. But that still makes it short doesn't it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but some months it would be 5 weeks and some months it could be 4 weeks, so you could get either 12 or 13 pay days a year depending on how his pay is worked. There are not many companys that do a 4 week pay day mow so it is most likely on a certain date each month which would mean 12 paydays per year. Hope this makes sense.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Assisted blonde is right about 4 or 5 weeks each pay run from employers.

also employers are SUPPOSED to pay the funds to csa bank by 19th/m however very often the employers ignore this and will therefore pay it late making any processing at the csa end delayed. Unless the employer is significantly late (ie 3m) and does so regularly, the csa are very restricted in law what they can do. They HAVE to follow a process to get it to court but usually the employer finally pays up and of course they cannot then be taken to court.

The weekly figure you have been given sounds like what the regular liability has been calculated as (which is always a weekly figure). Anyway even if ur ex is paid weekly, the employers can send it in monthly.

 

To the poster who has to call all the time to get the funds released; i would bet that there is a technical glitch on ur case and because of that it won't auto-allocate the funds over to ur side of the case. Next time u call them ask if the payments have to go thru the 'manual payment' process or is it that they have to click about. Or in better terms. 'Y won't the payments allocate automatically'.

Actually LadyJ it sounds like there's been a problem with where the allocations go. Is ur case older than march 2003 by any chance? If there is SoS debt, then there is a way to temporarily suspend it to allow funds to go to u instead. But getting someone who knows who to do it without messing the case up further, is rare.

Anyway I hope things get sorted out for u guys soon!

SAFU

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...