Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
    • I've looked at your case specifically more.   Term 8bii reads " when, in accordance with instructions from the Customer or the Consignee, the Consignment is left in a safe place" Their terms choose to not define safe, so they are put to proof that the location is safe. If your property opens onto a street its a simple thing of putting a google earth image and pointing out that its not a safe place
    • New rules and higher rates resulted in a jump in the number of savers opening accounts at the start of this year's Isa season.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Now living in Scotland - is the debt statute-barred?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4413 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all

 

If the title seems obscure, I'm sorry, but I'll keep this as short as possible!

 

1) My brother (yes, it really is my brother and not a euphemism for me!) was living in the South East in 2003 and took out a Capital One card. Eventually, he fell behind and defaulted on the card.

 

2) In 2005, Buchanan Clark and Wells approached him and arranged monthly repayments of £36 on the account. He made these until October 2006. He believed the debt was settled.

 

3) In 2010, my brother moved to Scotland, where he's been on the electoral roll ever since. In that time, no company representing Capital One has chased him for any debt.

 

4) In February 2012, he sent a SAR to Capital One believing that there may have been PPI on any accounts that he may have held with them. There wasn't. It included letters from Buchanan Clerk and Wells regarding the debt and payments. It also stated that in April 2007 the debt was sold by Capital One to Arrow Global.

 

5) Last week, he received a letter from Rockwell, on behalf of Arrow Global (who took over from Capital One) seeking payment of £119 on the outstanding balance. My brother thought that the account was settled in October 2006.

 

6) Today, he spoke with Rockwell and explained that he had no knowledge of the debt and that if it did exist then it was statute barred. Rockwell told him that the address on the account was in England (2003 when the account opened, 2004 when defaulted, 2005 when with BCW and 2006 when the final payment was made) and that it wasn't statute barred. He explained that a) he's been living in Scotland for the last two and a bit years; b) at no time did Capital One contact him between October 2006 and now; c) at no time has Arrow Global contacted him between October 2006 and now; d) there is no reference to any debt to Capital One, Arrow Global or Rockwell on his credit reports with Experian and Equifax.

 

So, a little advice would be useful here: there has been no effort to contact my brother regarding the debt for more than 5 years since the last payment was made to the account. He no longer lives at the address in England where the account was taken out (and hasn't for some time before moving to Scotland). He now lives in Scotland. Does he fall under the jurisdiction of Scots law and is the debt statute barred?

 

I believe it's statute-barred and so does he. To support our argument, he recently received a letter from CapQuest chasing a debt with M&S Money from 2003 (the date of the last payment). He knew nothing about this and believes his ex may have used the card after they separated. CapQuest bought the debt in January 2006. When he wrote to them, he explained that he knew nothing of it and stated that it was statute-barred. They agreed and closed the file/account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@squenci: Thanks for confirming. Strikes me that nobody at any of the businesses involved could be bothered to do a simple address or credit check and write a letter. They waited until my brother go in touch and thought they'd have a go.

 

I've already drafted a letter to Rockwell stating that the debt is statute-barred, etc. but doubt that they will listen. Any advice on how to go about telling them to sod off if they persist?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is I belive a ''residence'' qualification in

this situation 3 or 6 months if is a permanent

move.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Brigadier2JCS - Thanks for the advice. Am looking around for info. to clarify the situation. The minimum requirement for residence doesn't seem to be an issue.

 

@sequenci - You re-posted your earlier comment. I was hoping that you could offer some advice on how to approach the issue if Rockwell deny it's statute barred and persist in chasing my brother.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I no payment or acknowledgment

has been made in 5 years the debt

is not only statute barred but is completely

extinguished and I'm sure your brother meets

the residency requirements.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

He could send the folowing to Rockwell.

To The Compliance Manager,

Rockwell

 

xxxxxxx

 

Ref: xxxxxxx

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

I write with reference to a debt you allege is owed by me for xxxxxx,

please take note I so not acknowledge any debt to you or any company

you may claim to represent.

Your claim to be able to pursue such alleged debt has no merit for

the following reason I am resident in Scotland and in simple terms

a debt becomes statute barred under Scottish Legislation after 5 years

with np payment or acknowledgment having in that period and I'm

sure you are aware the debt is not only Statute Barred but is totally

extinguished under Scottish Law.

Therefore given the FACTS stated above I will not now or in the future

be making any payment or offer of payment.

I therefore now consider the matter closed and please regard

this letter as my final response.

I will not hesitate to complain to the regulatory authorities should

make any further contact.

 

Add amend as needed.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is something i have found

 

Statute Barred Debt - Scotland

In Scotland the law relating to the time period that a debt can no longer be pursued in the courts is different from the rest of the UK. Here is a brief guide on how you use the law to deal with creditors chasing you for old debts.

What is a statute barred debt?

Statute barred debts are debts which cannot be legally enforced. The Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973, Section 6 limits the timescale which a creditor can take legal action to recover their money to 5 years, provided the following conditions are met:-

• There are no outstanding decrees against you, AND

• No payments have been made towards the debt for the last 5 years, AND

• No written communications with the creditors have taken place acknowledging the debt.

Please not if the debt is in joint names then the above also applies to the joint party.

If these conditions are met then you cannot be taken to court by the creditors. This does not clear the debt so it may appear on your credit file as outstanding.

How to handle debt collectors and creditors

You now believe your debt to be statute barred so what is the next step? How can you stop the debt collectors from ringing you at all hours? How can you stop their letters? This 3 stage action plan should stop them.

1. Find out if there are any decrees made against you. To do this you should contact the three credit reference agencies and check your credit file.

2. Obtain any information the company has on you through the Data Protection Act 1988 using this template letter. When writing to any finance company about a debt which you suspect is time barred never sign the letter.

3. Use this sample letter to write to the creditor stating that under Section 6 of the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 applies to the debt and it is now time barred.

Note: If the above has not worked and you are still receiving calls from debt collectors or finance companies looking for money then contact your local council's trading standards department and they'll help.

Important

Keep copies of all letters and send them by recorded delivery.

Why do I say that you should never sign any letters? Well, some people think that there are a few unscrupulous finance and debt collection companies that have in the past used the signature attached to letters to forged letters from debtors acknowledging the debt! I don't have any proof of this but I am just let you know so you can make up your own mind.

When writing to any debt collection company, make sure you head the letter up, "I do not acknowledge any debt to you or any other company or organisation that you claim to be representing."

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...