Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? I've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lilos Cupcakes / Sugarswirlz


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4426 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

well up to know the solicitors letter has not turned up lol and she still hasnt managed to get hold of her contract off her so called friend, ALSO shes getting every excuse or even being ignored or struggling to get hold of the owner

in regards to her 3 days wages of 24 hours + , first time she attempted to contact them she got told that no one had been paid due to the owner struggling to get hold of her accountant to find out how much everyone should be payed , joke company it seems tbh , well worth steering clear of it seems ............where would the best place be to go to try and get her wages shes entitled to , because the owners mobile wont accept texts off my partners phone for some reason lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Try a different phone to text her from! You can take her to court for wages owed or try going to the shop and throwing a tantrum like someone else did when they had sold out of their favourite cupcakes, gets publicity if nothing else.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Next step would be to produce a written grievance saying what you want and when you want it by and if you dont recieve it you will take it further. I have a copy of one if you want it? Doesnt matter about how much it is she still owes it! if you dont hear from her in the set number of days next steps would be either to go to acas where you will be appointed a conciliator or to start employment tribunal proceedings

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi this is Sugarswirlz.

 

Straight from the horse's mouth so to speak, this lady did not work for Sugarswirlz, she worked for a franchisee.

 

The franchisee is responsible for this lady as she was empolyed by Lilos Cupcakes.

 

Please do not bring Sugarswirlz name into this at its irrelevant and slanderous.

 

The solicitors don't have just one client to deal with and as someone pointed out we have had bank holidays etc.

We would advise you to refrain from declaring your opinion further on this subject until you have sought legal advice.

 

Badboy09 will be hearing from the solicitors within due course.

 

Just to clarify once again this lady did not work for Sugarswirlz at all it was for Lilos Cupcakes,

Sugarswirlz is not responsible for her pay, her hours of work, her contract or any other employment issues.

 

Please check your facts before posting.

 

It is defermation and slanderous as it is not true.

 

The lady in question only ever signed a confidentiality agreement of which she is in breach of.

 

I will post again when the solicitors have engaged as we are confident on this matter.

 

Thankyou for reading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
:scared: Solicitors are coming !!!! defamation cases are really an expensive waste of time for all parties unless you are really famous, however if what sugarswirlz is saying is true then an apology should suffice.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I would like to clarify a few things as it seems you like to push all faults towards other people.

 

This person did indeed work for Lilo's and she had been paid upto date for the time she had worked for Lilo's.

 

However she was then told she would be paid by Sugarswirlz from the 2nd april onwards and all profit made through the cabin now went to Sugarswirlz.

 

Due to the post on this forum the ladies contract was terminated as the Owner of Sugarswirlz did not like the bad publicity that it "could" cause.

 

The reason for this post is because the owner of Sugarswirlz owes this lady her wages for 5 working days and as yet not paid her.

 

She also owes me 3 weeks wages which I am not expecting her to honor either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if i thought a apology was sufficient towards sugarswirlz i would give one ,

but i dont actually think she deserves one,

 

shes a [problem] artist through and through ,

 

i have enough details on my side which i can reveal that will end her business ,

 

but to throw all my cards in the pile in 1 go would be a foolish move on my part ,

 

so i will wait till the time is right to play my hand :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi this is Sugarswirlz.

 

Straight from the horse's mouth so to speak, this lady did not work for Sugarswirlz, she worked for a franchisee.

 

The franchisee is responsible for this lady as she was empolyed by Lilos Cupcakes.

 

Please do not bring Sugarswirlz name into this at its irrelevant and slanderous.

 

The solicitors don't have just one client to deal with and as someone pointed out we have had bank holidays etc.

We would advise you to refrain from declaring your opinion further on this subject until you have sought legal advice.

 

Badboy09 will be hearing from the solicitors within due course.

 

Just to clarify once again this lady did not work for Sugarswirlz at all it was for Lilos Cupcakes,

Sugarswirlz is not responsible for her pay, her hours of work, her contract or any other employment issues.

 

Please check your facts before posting.

 

It is defermation and slanderous as it is not true.

 

The lady in question only ever signed a confidentiality agreement of which she is in breach of.

 

I will post again when the solicitors have engaged as we are confident on this matter.

 

Thankyou for reading.

.

 

 

Slander - nope.

 

Slander is spoken; defamation in writing is libel.

 

I am very surprised that your solicitor doesn't seem to have pointed this out, since it is fundamental to your case.

 

I can't see anything actionable in what's been posted to date.

 

If you are posting as a company representative you must contact admin to establish your bona fides first, for obvious reasons.

 

Given that you are complaining about someone not following rules,

 

I am surprised that you haven't read CAG's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont u find it somewhat amusing that now 2 people have come forward

because of the owner of sugarswirlz has not payed them their wages that they are owed for working for this joke company ,

 

yet THE owner of sugarswirlz can still afford to supposidly pay for a solicitor to fight this libel slander case which she has no grounds against ,

really is pathetic tbh ,

 

she should be named and shamed and made aware to the public what sort of person she really is !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL! Why don't you two ladies have a go at the County Court route to get this money you are owed? Her word against yours after all - explanations will have to be made if she responded to any summons. Now that's the sort of legal action that doesn't need an empty threat, you just go ahead and do it basically!

 

I hate cupcakes, I don;t know what the fuss is about the horrible things. Sponge is always dry, frostings always disappointing. Can be knocked up in minutes in the kitchen, just as vile, fraction of the cost! Give me a fresh cream (and jam) cake every time please. Ooh I will admit to a particular weakness though - Tesco's designer doughnuts - strawberry and cream - gawd have to stay out of Tesco's right now!

 

Of course I talk here about cupcakes in general, not the ones that have caused such a hoohah on this thread. Never 'eard of 'em. Hope they don't try and slanderise or libelise me for saying cupcakes are vile! Personal opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hahaha thought u were on about her cupcakes lmao rofl , that might be the action that may need to be taken , but i have got a fair idea whats gonna happen in advance lol and i think the owner of sugarswirlz does to lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

this goes far far beyond owing wages theres other details yet to be divulged that will no doubt see her finished lol but all in good time :)

 

if the owner of sugarswirlz is still reading this ,

she can thank one of her female staff beginning with M for all this trouble

( sorry to be cryptic there but that last bit was for sugarswirlz eyes lol)

 

this company only deserves whats coming to them , and all in good time :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont u find it somewhat amusing that now 2 people have come forward because of the owner of sugarswirlz has not payed them their wages that they are owed for working for this joke company , yet THE owner of sugarswirlz can still afford to supposidly pay for a solicitor to fight this libel slander case which she has no grounds against , really is pathetic tbh , she should be named and shamed and made aware to the public what sort of person she really is !!!!

 

Sugarswirlz refrains from comment until further notice. However this is very serious matter and all comments have been handed to the lawyers. Thank you for reading please keep posted as the outcome will be soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

rofl this has got to be seen to be believed ,

considering less than 10 days ago ,

the owners words to my partners friend were

 

" u get a solicitor to take legal action against these AS i cant afford to "

 

hence why my partners friend walked out ,

 

if u wish me to divulge more of that convo then just give me a heads up and i will reveal more :)and sugarswirlz refrains from comments until further notice ...

 

. why is it cos u are backed into a corner and are your on the losing end ,

 

this is all big talk from your end .....

 

infact i dont need to say much more tbh ,

 

because whats in motiion at the moment will end it all in 1 swoop ,

 

cya in court this should be fun lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trying to be polite, I can see that both parties believe that they have a case here, but legal action is expensive, takes a very long time and in this case I don't think it would be all that productive for either party. Wouldn't it be better to try and settle this as amicably as possible?

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trying to be polite, I can see that both parties believe that they have a case here, but legal action is expensive, takes a very long time and in this case I don't think it would be all that productive for either party. Wouldn't it be better to try and settle this as amicably as possible?

 

to far gone for that im afraid lol , but in all fairness i can back my evidence up and i doubt they can , but i really hope it goes to court and up in front of a judge , just to see what we had to deal with lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's pretty unlikely that this will ever get as far as a court if I'm completely honest. That's why it would be better to try to find a way to resolve this quietly so everyone can move on.

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sugarswirlz refrains from comment until further notice. However this is very serious matter and all comments have been handed to the lawyers. Thank you for reading please keep posted as the outcome will be soon.

Two words.....Sheriffs Office.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sugarswirlz refrains from comment until further notice. However this is very serious matter and all comments have been handed to the lawyers. Thank you for reading please keep posted as the outcome will be soon.

 

I do hope this means that you understand the requirement to contact admin to establish that you are who you say you are before posting again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I think that whatever the rights or wrongs of this situation no one should be making threats about putting people out of business,

it all seems to be getting rather silly and I am sure there are rights and wrongs on both sides.

 

If What Sugerswirlz is saying is correct about employment status then no they wouldnt owe the money if this is not true then they do

and I would hope that as an employer they would just pay up,

 

I cannot see that any employer would put up with a load of hassle and badmouthing if they were in the wrong or when a small wages payment would end the matter,

but then again there may be other issues that we dont know about.

 

Either way all this talk of defasmation/solicitors/courts etc seems to be getting a bit OTT in my opinion and nothing constructive seems to be happening.

 

If there is a claim for wages claim in the small claims court, simple strightforward and easy,

 

I assume the OP has already sent a letter giving 14 days to pay the outstanding wages,

if not then he/she should do, stop talking and take some productive action.

 

If Sugarswirlz feels thay have a case against the OP get on with it,

stop threatening as it dosnt do your business any good to get embroiled in a public debate, just sort it.

 

failing that I will come down and bang your heads together as it sounds like children squabbling now.

  • Confused 1

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...