Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Time off with Depression, employer requesting medical records after 5 weeks of certified sickness - help please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4420 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everybody,

 

I have been at my job since July 2011. It was initially a 6 month contract which then got extended to May of this year, with the possibility of being made permanent after this time.

 

I have suffered with depression on and off since my mid teens (I am now 22). I had a long period of feeling ok, and then during January I started to feel very ill again. I had had a long period of feeling "bullied" by my manager, and raised a grievance which was dealt with in the correct fashion by my employer.

 

After this, I have been very unwell with depression and anxiety and have been signed off work. I am in the 5th week now and have been on a weekly review with my doctor, sending in weekly sickness certificates to my employer, and keeping them updated with my condition.

 

On Tuesday my doctor told me that she is going to refer me for psychiatric treatment, and has signed me off until April 12th. I contacted my employer and let them know this, and sent my doctor's certificate off to them as usual.

 

I have this morning received a letter requesting my consent to obtain a medical report from my GP or specialist, and saying that they will be making decision on whether or not to terminate my employment based on the findings of the report (ie if the report doesn't give a date in the "reasonably near future" of my returning to work).

 

I have only been off for 5 weeks and been certified from the start. I feel like they are trying to get rid of me, don't believe me and I am not being treated fairly. If someone had a broken leg, they would be off for longer than this and not know exactly when they will be back, and there's no way that they would be treated like this.

 

Can you help? I'd just like to know my rights, and if they terminate my employment does it count as unfair dismissal? I am so stressed and unwell at the moment and this is like the final nail in the coffin - losing my job will make me even more ill.

 

Thanks so much, Bekah

Link to post
Share on other sites

You really dont have any employment rights until you have been employed for a year, employers can sack you on a number of grounds but I would say that in this case they could be looking at competancy, in that due to the time of and nature of your illness you may not be able to cope with your job in the long term.

However they must follow correct procedures to dismiss you.

Obviously you are worried but as you have already after less than a year had to raise a grievence for bullying do you think that this is a company you could be happy contiuing to work for. It is good that your grievence was dealt with correctly which could suggest that your employers do adhere to correct procedures in which case they would hopefully follow these if they decide to part company with you.

 

If your job is causing you problems with your mental health then you need to look after yourself, there is no point in contiuing to try and work in an environment that is not right for you if all that happens is that you end up having to go off sick.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depression is classed as a disability under the Equality Act and your employer should try and make reasonable adjustments. Their may be a capability issue here but your employer has to look at all avenues and treat your fairly. The one rule issue probably would not effect you as you are classed as disabled and exempt from it. You can raise a claim to ET but watch your timescale as its very strict 3 months - 1 day. from last issue of alleged discrimination under DDA legislation.

 

5 weeks to decide if you are capable or doing your job is silly. I would raise a further grievance and find out if anyone has been off longer and what the action was.

 

YOU have rights here, do not resign and exercise your right. Allow them to get a doctors report but ensure its not released to your work until you discuss and see it before you send to your work.

 

Good luck, and best wishes

Edited by johnvernon74
further info
Link to post
Share on other sites

i could be incorrect here but they hold no grounds to gain your medical records. they could request you attend a medical examination, which is likely part of the company as thats normal when somebody is off sick for a larg period of time. but even with myself that didnt happen untill i think 2 years into my illness.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i could be incorrect here but they hold no grounds to gain your medical records. they could request you attend a medical examination, which is likely part of the company as thats normal when somebody is off sick for a larg period of time. but even with myself that didnt happen untill i think 2 years into my illness.

 

Hello there.

 

I've been through this. They can write to your GP to ask about your state of health, but as I understand it, only in relation to your current problem. They're not allowed to trawl back through your records.

 

As johnvernon said, you can see the letter before it goes to your employer to make sure you're happy with it.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing to be aware of here is that if you refuse to allow them to get a medical report, they may well be entitled to dismiss you, without it being disability discrimination, as you have obstructed their attempts to get medical evidence in relation to your health. Without that information, they could fairly dismiss you as they have attempted to gather all evidence relating to your disability and future fitness to work. I'd say therefore that its in your interests to allow the information to go back to your employer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing to be aware of here is that if you refuse to allow them to get a medical report, they may well be entitled to dismiss you, without it being disability discrimination, as you have obstructed their attempts to get medical evidence in relation to your health. Without that information, they could fairly dismiss you as they have attempted to gather all evidence relating to your disability and future fitness to work. I'd say therefore that its in your interests to allow the information to go back to your employer.

 

I agree with you becky2585 but clearly in this case the OP would only be looking at the record before going to her employer. From experience - and very recently - The Equality Act certainly is on the side of the employee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Thanks for your responses. I did not think for one second of witholding my medical report from my employer, I just feel that they are putting a large amount of pressure on me to just "get better", which isn't possible, or fair.

 

By "raising a claim to the ET" - what do you mean by that? Sorry I don't know the abbreviations.

 

Many thanks,

 

Bekah

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you refuse to release your medical records, then they are entitled to make a decision without your evidence, I'd be very careful here, I was off with depression and Anxiety and after about 2 months my employer asked for my medical records. They are entitled to ask for your current illness records but nothing else, also they really should write a questionnaire to your GP or Consultant. Your main problem is that you have not been employed for over 12 mths and therefore and employment tribunal will take that into account in deciding your case.

I am not a legal professional or adviser, I am however a Law Student and very well versed areas of Employment Law. Anything I write here is purely from my own experiences! If I help, then click the star to add to my reputation :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have very limited rights within 12 mths, you are covered by disability discrimination etc and if they are making decisions based solely on their opinion of your disability then that is wrong.

But you have to have a disability within the Equality Act 2010, which states that it must have a long term and adverse affect on normal day-today activities.

 

If you do not give them access to your medical status then how are they to make a decision that is fair?

I am not a legal professional or adviser, I am however a Law Student and very well versed areas of Employment Law. Anything I write here is purely from my own experiences! If I help, then click the star to add to my reputation :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would say give them access to your records for your current illness, and more importantly concentrate on getting better :)

I am not a legal professional or adviser, I am however a Law Student and very well versed areas of Employment Law. Anything I write here is purely from my own experiences! If I help, then click the star to add to my reputation :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...