Jump to content


Littlewoods advice regarding claiming back charges


Ryan88
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4459 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am contemplating whether to send a SAR to Littlewoods because I'm not sure whether it is worth it?

 

I know for a fact I have been hit by their £12 charges on several occasions for late minimum payment, but I've also read that some people have had £12 charges just for recieving letters and attempted phone calls etc?

(not sure if the latter charges have been applied to my account)

 

I need all the money I can get at the moment, so sending £10 and paying recorded delivery just to get the SAR doesn't seem worth it unless I have a decent chance of claiming some of the charges back?

 

Are the £12 late payment fees ever able to be reclaimed?

 

Any advice gladly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

yes they are

 

see a few of the other threds here in this forum.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your post. I've been reading a few threads regarding Littlewoods on here but can't seem to find one that offers 100% clarity regarding the issue.

 

On what grounds am I eligble to claim back the £12 fees for either

a. late minimum payment

b. insufficent minimum payment

Link to post
Share on other sites

“Default charges are not 'core terms'

3.4 'Core terms' relate to the definition of the main subject matter of the

contract or to the adequacy of the price or remuneration as against the

services supplied in exchange. They are subject to the UTCCRs, but are

outside the scope of the test of fairness by virtue of Regulation 6(2). We

do not consider that terms providing for default/penalty charges are core terms.

(In this context the breaches of contract which may lead to a default

charge typically arise where a customer exceeds a credit limit, fails to

pay or fails to honour a payment date.) Consumers do not generally enter into

such contracts expecting to incur these charges. We consider that the

charges are not the substance of the bargain but are simply an incidental

charge that is applied if some of the main obligations are not complied

with. Furthermore these charges can only reflect the true loss to the company

and administration costs.

 

Basically for all they say it is in their terms and conditions for it to stand up in court they have to prove that it costs them £12 to send a letter or make a phone call, which they have never done in writing as they know it doesn't

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...