Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Anyway, I've asked my Booking.com flat-rent-out-bloke what needs to be done on the Booking.com portal to cancel a reservation. I got a late message "I'll let you know tomorrow".
    • I see that at the start of your thread you said they hadn't sent a Letter of Claim.  And in fact in all the uploaded material there is no LoC.  This is great news.  Even were you to lose - you won't - the judge would chop off a chunk of the money for their non-respect of PAPLOC. However, I'm a bit confused as you've named the file name as a SAR.  Are you sure about this?  Did you send any other letters apart from the one dx advised which was a CPR request (not a SAR) to DCBL (not Group Nexus).  I'm not being pernickety, this will be important for your Witness Statement further down the line.
    • I didn’t say it wouldn’t. That is not the issue here. To continue driving after the licence has expired (under s88), the driver must have submitted a “qualifying application”.  An application disclosing a relevant medical condition (of which sleep apnoea is one) is not a “qualifying application”, This means the driver cannot take advantage of s88 and must wait for the DVLA to make its decision before resuming driving.   The driver’s belief is irrelevant. The fact that a licence was eventually granted may mitigate the offence, but does it does not provide a defence.   But this driver didn’t meet the conditions. I explained why in my earlier post. He only meets the conditions if his application does not declare a relevant medical condition. His did.   As I explained, after his birthday he did not hold a licence that could be revoked.   In my view it doesn’t matter what it says. The offence is committed because his application declared a medical condition. Meanwhile his licence expired and s88 is not available to him. The GP letter would form part of the material the DVLA would use to complete their investigations. But until those enquiries are completed he could not drive.   The offence does not carry points or a disqualification (because a licence could have been held by your father). It only carries a fine and the guideline is half a week’s net income. If he pleads guilty that fine will be reduced by a third. He will also pay a surcharge of 40% of that fine. But the big difference is prosecution costs: a guilty plea will see costs of about £90 ordered whilst being convicted following a trial will see costs in the region of £600.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help - returning faulty items to comet ***Resolved***


jussiep
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4470 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I bought a TVDVD from Comet, its just 20 days old and the DVD has broken. When I returned to Comet I was told that their policy is to send it a way to test before they will repair/replace. They tested in the shop and confirmed that it was faulty but said that they still had to send away to confirm. I asked for a replacement as it was only 20 days old and was told no until it had been tested and then they would contact me to discuss. Surely I have more rights than this? They also said that the policy on returns differs depending on the product purchased, I asked why customers are not told this and they said they were under no obligation to advertise this in the store.

Is this correct, do I have to wait up to 2 weeks (this is what they said) before they tell me what they are prepared to do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Your item is less than 28 days old so you are entitled to a refund or replacement under SOGA

 

Be aware that Comet will try everything to fob you off but keep at them and you will get what is right

 

Have a read of some other Comet threads to get up to speed

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jussiep

 

Welcome to CAG

 

Have a read of 12 and 13 in my signature. Tell them the product needs to be replaced immediately, under the Sale of Goods Act. Tell them if it isn't replaced you will lodge a court claim against them. If they still want to play stupid, get them to ring Bob Darke, Managing Director. Once they get through to him, say that you've explained SOGA to the staff at the store, but they don't seem to understand, can he explain it to them. Explain that the store have tested it, it is 'faulty' and as such needs to be replaced. If they don't replace it, ask for a refund, shop elsewhere.

 

Thread has been moved to the correct forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice. Have spoken to comet and they say they may replace it but only after it has been tested to confirm that it is faulty, this can take up to 2 weeks. Spoke to thier head office and they say the same thing. They have not refused at this stage to replace it but that it has to be tested first. It didnt work in the store as its faulty but when I said that to head office they told me that the store staff arent qualied to make that decision and it still needs to be sent away. I am without a TV while this is happening. is it worth me ringing the MD or am I wasting my time until the results of the tests come back? It seems bad to me that after 20 days I have all this hastle

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jussiep,

 

At this stage would you be happy to get a Refund? If so how did you pay?

 

If you paid by Credit Card or Visa Debt contact your card provider, ask to do a Chargeback.

 

http://www.which.co.uk/consumer-rights/sale-of-goods/your-rights-when-paying-by-credit-card/chargeback-on-credit-and-debit-cards/

 

They've got the product back, you get your money back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I bought a TVDVD from Comet, its just 20 days old and the DVD has broken. When I returned to Comet I was told that their policy is to send it a way to test before they will repair/replace. They tested in the shop and confirmed that it was faulty but said that they still had to send away to confirm. I asked for a replacement as it was only 20 days old and was told no until it had been tested and then they would contact me to discuss. Surely I have more rights than this? They also said that the policy on returns differs depending on the product purchased, I asked why customers are not told this and they said they were under no obligation to advertise this in the store.

Is this correct, do I have to wait up to 2 weeks (this is what they said) before they tell me what they are prepared to do?

 

Correct me if i'm wrong, but does the retailer not have the right to have the product tested/ inspected by a qualified engineer for the fault under SOGA before a refund or exchange is handed out???

Link to post
Share on other sites

More gobblygook , the Retail Store CAN confirm that the product is faulty which is not rocket science . (But they do not want to)

 

As for qualified Engineers very soon a thing from the distant past with regards to COMET.

 

The product is twenty days old and has failed the customer is entitled to an exchange or refund with immediate effect even in COMETLAND.

 

Someone please tell them !

Regards

GorgieBoy

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest, 'the retailer' did not test the product when they received the product from 'the manufacturer', so why they would want to test it now, I'm not quite sure.

 

Correct me if i'm wrong, but does the retailer not have the right to have the product tested/ inspected by a qualified engineer for the fault under SOGA before a refund or exchange is handed out???
Link to post
Share on other sites

Comet did test in store and confirmed that it is faulty but still said they need to send it away for testing to confirm, what the point in that is I dont know other than to delay things.

Phoned again and was told that if it is confirmed faulty then they would give me my money back but have to wait for this test. Thats what head office said but will find out what the store says when they come back to us. Head office did say that the store managers decision is final.

thanks everyone for your advice here, its very much appreciated.

Apart from phone calls and letters I am still nowhere so have to wait for the test results and then fight on from there. Will go to bank and put payment into dispute if no money is forthcoming following tests as they now have the product.

Will definatley never shop there again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jussiep ,

 

Follow the advice given by ims and rebel.

 

I am afraid that due to the massive changes going on at COMET just now it seems that ignoring SOGA seems to be top of their list .

 

YES the Retail Store could and should replace or refund but once again it comes down to figures and statistics as the Retail Store takes the hit for replacing your product so therefore any barriers they can put in place they will erect.

 

Not good at all , that is one of the reasons COMET will not be on the go for much longer and their customer service is declining rapidly when many thought it could not get any worse.

Regards

GorgieBoy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Comet did test in store and confirmed that it is faulty but still said they need to send it away for testing to confirm, what the point in that is I dont know other than to delay things.

Phoned again and was told that if it is confirmed faulty then they would give me my money back but have to wait for this test. Thats what head office said but will find out what the store says when they come back to us. Head office did say that the store managers decision is final.

thanks everyone for your advice here, its very much appreciated.

Apart from phone calls and letters I am still nowhere so have to wait for the test results and then fight on from there. Will go to bank and put payment into dispute if no money is forthcoming following tests as they now have the product.

Will definatley never shop there again

 

 

You are letting them take control and letting them tell you what is going to happen.

 

This will drag and drag unless you do something proactive

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was under the impression that there is no right to a replacement just a refund under SOG. That said the goods are not fit for purpose and the customer should get a refund.

 

I would suggest an immediate replacement or refund should be the norm regarding the product in question in this thread , the product is 20 days old and has been confirmed as faulty by the retailer .

 

The retailer does not want to refund or exchange at this moment in time either way they are ignoring SOGA.

 

jussiep bought this product in good faith had a refund been offered in the first instance he either purchases another similar product from COMET or shops elsewhere.

 

It is in the best interest of COMET to replace the product which results in a happy customer so therefore he may return and shop again.

 

Unfortunately at this moment in time neither option is available and as a result another lost customer to be added to the list .

Edited by GorgieBoy

Regards

GorgieBoy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was under the impression that there is no right to a replacement just a refund under SOG. That said the goods are not fit for purpose and the customer should get a refund.

 

The additional rights for buyers in the SOGA state that the buyer has the right to request a repair or replacement, if this is not possible then the buyer has the right to rescind the contract. It just depends whether the OP is going to claim under s13 or s48

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest, 'the retailer' did not test the product when they received the product from 'the manufacturer', so why they would want to test it now, I'm not quite sure.

 

Thats because the retailer will accept that the manufacturer has tested the item before shipping it to them. Comet may be a little over the top by sending it to an engineer for an inspection of the fault, but legally they have every right to do so (even under SOGA). They are not refusing a refund and the OP will probably get their refund however i'm sure they recieve lots of customers who make up faults with their products and try returning them hence why they have this strict process in place. Im not suggesting that this is the case in this instance though and im sure Comet could use some discretion in the matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the 'Retailer' hasn't tested the product before selling it to a consumer?

 

Thats because the retailer will accept that the manufacturer has tested the item before shipping it to them. Comet may be a little over the top by sending it to an engineer for an inspection of the fault, but legally they have every right to do so (even under SOGA). They are not refusing a refund and the OP will probably get their refund however i'm sure they recieve lots of customers who make up faults with their products and try returning them hence why they have this strict process in place. Im not suggesting that this is the case in this instance though and im sure Comet could use some discretion in the matter.
Link to post
Share on other sites

So the 'Retailer' hasn't tested the product before selling it to a consumer?

 

Most probably not, as the manufacturer of the item has tested it before shipping it to them. They probably do random spot checks on their products but they don't test each and every item.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to this particular thread COMET the retailer HAVE inspected this product and have confirmed the product is faulty !!

 

This though it would seem is still not enough for them to give an immediate refund or exchange in COMETLAND

 

The product is 20 days old and jussiep is still getting the runaround .

 

As I have stated earlier follow the advice given by ims and rebel or we will be here for ever .

 

And please no one say it must be inspected and confirmed faulty by a " Qualified Comet Engineer" before any further action can be carried out .

Edited by GorgieBoy

Regards

GorgieBoy

Link to post
Share on other sites

.

 

As I have stated earlier follow the advice given by ims and rebel or we will be here for ever . :pound:

 

And please no one say it must be inspected and confirmed faulty by a " Qualified Comet Engineer" before any further action can be carried out .

 

Oh and it must be inspected and confirmed by a Quali.......:tape2::bolt:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I'd make sure the product was in full working order before I sold it, random checks just doesn't work for me. It wouldn't stand up in court.

 

Most probably not, as the manufacturer of the item has tested it before shipping it to them. They probably do random spot checks on their products but they don't test each and every item.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Being Realistic i wouldnt expect a store to check every item before selling it, if you are concerned you can always ask them to check it before you leave the store. Anyway how would they check things like washing machines? Its a sad fact that sometimes stores dont always respond in the way we would like but we dont always go in with a clear picture of what we want, If this customer had stood her ground and asked for a refund they may have agreed just to avoid a confrontation in the store in front of other customers. i am sure the situation will be resolved eventually but a letter stating that the delay/action taken was unacepptable shoule be sent to the head office as without knowing what customers experience they cant rectify their systems.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, what your saying is that we the consumer, should buy products from the retailer on 'trust', it's surprising that when the consumer says, 'the product doesn't work', the stores tests it, it doesn't work, it has to go away to be tested, where's the 'trust'?

Being Realistic i wouldnt expect a store to check every item before selling it, if you are concerned you can always ask them to check it before you leave the store. Anyway how would they check things like washing machines? Its a sad fact that sometimes stores dont always respond in the way we would like but we dont always go in with a clear picture of what we want, If this customer had stood her ground and asked for a refund they may have agreed just to avoid a confrontation in the store in front of other customers. i am sure the situation will be resolved eventually but a letter stating that the delay/action taken was unacepptable shoule be sent to the head office as without knowing what customers experience they cant rectify their systems.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...