Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the and the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Council Tax and Bailiff bit of Advice needed please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4489 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I wonder if someone can give me a bit of advice.

 

We have struggled to pay the council tax this year and ended up in arrears and a liability order. I havent heard anything from the council since the liability order until today a bailiff came knocking at the door. he said i had to pay 10% then the rest can be paid on a payment plan. I told him there is nothing I can do at this moment as i dont have a penny. Thankfully he accepted that and told me to ring them handing me a letter which presumably he would have just pushed through the letter box had i not been in. (think it helpped that my baby was screaming his head off coz his lunch had just been interupted)

 

thankfully after some panicked phone calls to family I have managed to get the money together and aim to pay them tomorrow but a couple of questions for one the bailiff gave me a figure owed that is over £100 more than what the letter he handed me says so i am presuming i pay what the letter says rather than what he says. maybe he wanted to pocket the extra for himself?

 

Also I have read numerous times that i should pay the council not the bailiff so am i guessing i can pay the amount on the letter over the internet through the councils website which is how I always used to pay it (when I could) and once i have paid it should i contact the bailiff to say i have paid or just leave it and if they contact me show them the recipt that i have paid?

 

Any advice would be much appreciated and thank you in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

right pay the council direct, but use online system (they will turn you away if you go to pay in cash) there was no need to panic over this. Is there a list of charges and if so what charges did he put? Are you paying the 10% or the full amount?

  • Confused 1

I know my rights Mr DCA I'm with the CAG......hello hello where you gone Mr DCA8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankfully the full amount. there is a bit that says todays visit fee which is £24.50 then total outstanding further down there is a list with second visit fee:£18, levy fee£28 + £59, walking possession £12 x2, administration fee in accordance with section H:£24.50 if applicable x2

 

Im guessing these are what they will charge me for future things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So should I pay the amount thats on the letter and after payment should i contact the bailiff and tell them i've paid?

 

Thank you so much for the advice Padja.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cant charge 2 wp on same visit

section H - cant charge that

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it they can only charge the 24.50 which it states todays visit fee which is the first contact I have had from them and all he really did was hand me the letter after telling me what i owed then promptly left.

 

Do you think this would have been added on the outstanding amount or is this on top as the total outstanding has been hand written in.

 

thanks dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

You only owe the first visit fee, ask the council what is on the LO, and pay that in plus £24.50 for the first visit fee, he hasn't levied any goods yet, so cannot charge a head h fee to redeem the goods on a non existent levy, neither are any of the other fees applicable. Others will bealong, but there is no law that says you have to deal with the bailiff so pay off the outstanding plus the £24.50 to the council, and ignore the bailiff he is a lying duplicitous cheat.

Edited by brassnecked
  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will the council tell me though or just say i have to ask the bailiff? Mind you trying to get hold of our council is virtually impossible.

I cant understand the extra £100 difference between what he said and what the letter said just doesnt add up.

 

Thanks brassnecked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

right pay the council direct, but use online system (they will turn you away if you go to pay in cash) - if you do pay in cash at the Council they are obliged to take it, any refusal and you politely ask for the name & position of the person refusing as it will form the basis of a complaint against the Council - there was no need to panic over this. Is there a list of charges and if so what charges did he put? Are you paying the 10% or the full amount?

 

PT

  • Confused 1

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will the council tell me though or just say i have to ask the bailiff? Mind you trying to get hold of our council is virtually impossible.

I cant understand the extra £100 difference between what he said and what the letter said just doesnt add up.

 

Thanks brassnecked.

 

Of the the extra £100, the bailiff has added, £75.50 of it is invalid imho, you only owe the first visit fee on top. you can pay it direct into the council using the online system. If you tender the payment and the council refuse it ask the person refusing the payment, to sign a note to that effect and the reason why they refuse it, and send a Formal complaint to head of revenues, and the CEO, elected leader and MP, stating that a lawful payment was refused you think to garner extra fees for a bailiff.

 

Others should be along soon to help you also.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will the council tell me though or just say i have to ask the bailiff? Mind you trying to get hold of our council is virtually impossible.

I cant understand the extra £100 difference between what he said and what the letter said just doesnt add up.

 

Thanks brassnecked.

 

It sounds as if you may have found one of the genuine Bailiffs and he has put this on to make you aware of the extra charges you could be charged. Secondly there may be a clue in your original post when you said "(think it helpped that my baby was screaming his head off coz his lunch had just been interupted)" which should have set an alarm off for him telling him that you are probably classed as "vulnerable" according to the National Standards for Enforcement Agents.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds as if you may have found one of the genuine Bailiffs and he has put this on to make you aware of the extra charges you could be charged. Secondly there may be a clue in your original post when you said "(think it helpped that my baby was screaming his head off coz his lunch had just been interupted)" which should have set an alarm off for him telling him that you are probably classed as "vulnerable" according to the National Standards for Enforcement Agents.

 

PT

Let's hope you are right PT, as not all bailiffs are rotters

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks brassnecked and PT think I will forget about the figure he told me and just go by what the letter says cant remember the exact amount anyhow.

I thought the baby may have helpped as he seemed to back away a bit as soon as he heard him and seemed a little eager to get it over with and leave. Will have to remember that one :-)

 

Will sort this out first thing in the morning and pay it over the internet so it is out the way and one less thing to worry about. But do I need to contact the bailiff to say I have paid?

 

You have all be so helpful Thank you. x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will sort this out first thing in the morning and pay it over the internet so it is out the way and one less thing to worry about. But do I need to contact the bailiff to say I have paid? Only you can decide this but if you do pay the Council will inform the Bailiff anyway, make sure you print a receipt off. If it were me I would just ignore him as a minor irritation after all there is no law that says you have to speak to or deal with a Bailiff.

You have all be so helpful Thank you. x

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...