Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unmanageable UK CC Debts in NL


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4448 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

Am a Brit, but have been resident in NL since 2008, where have a permanent job and a mortgage. I brought some credit cards with me, and are registered to my home address here in Holland, and have used them over the last three years, mainly for travelling back and forth to the UK where I have family commitments (elderly and ill parents to look after). I owe about 14,000 on three UK cards. (Barclaycard). Alas, owing to the downturn here, from April my job will be be made part time, and which means that I will be barely able to cover my mortgage, never mind the minimum payments on the credit cards. I'm worried about defaulting, but don't really know what my options are. In a worst case scenario could i be bankrupted for the UK debts here in Holland? Is my house and Dutch credit rating now at risk? Any insight would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically they are able to bring a civil action in the NLs but whether they would or not is a different matter. They would more than likely after a period of trying to chase you sell the debts on to a debt collection agency here in the UK and then claim tax relief.

 

Can you give a little more info about these CCs, was there any PPI involved & have they applied unfair charges at any time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say 'civil action', you mean a petition for bankruptcy served up in NL, even though the cards are issued in the UK?

 

The cc's are two Barclaycards (6,000 / 5,000) which I've had for 25 years, and an RBS card (2000). There's never been any payment insurance on them, and no unfair charges, mainly because I've managed the debts. Over the years, the barclaycards have had balances run up and cleared regularly, and in that time I've never missed a payment, which is why the prospect of default in the next few months is so troubling and daunting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say 'civil action', you mean a petition for bankruptcy served up in NL, even though the cards are issued in the UK?]
As you have been a non-UK resident for over three years they cannot bankrupt you here they would have to try in the NL, although this is unlikely. They would be more likely to apply for a CCJ there and then maybe the Dutch equivalent of a 'Charging Order' if they were aware that you had assets.

 

As I said in my previous post it is unlikely that they would pursue legal action in the NLs, although there are cross border agreements it is not the easiest and cheapest of things to do, particularly if they are uncertain of your ability to pay even if they won. They would be more likely to just sell the debts on.

 

The cc's are two Barclaycards (6,000 / 5,000) which I've had for 25 years
I doubt very much that they would be able to provide a copy of your original agreement so would find it just about impossible to pursue through a Dutch Court without one.

 

If you reduced your repayments to a more manageable level there is little they can do, they will probably mark your UK credit file as being in default but that would only affect your UK credit rating, they cannot mark your Dutch file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if you can only afford £1 per month by paying that it shows that you are not ignoring the debts. After huffing and puffing the bank will probably accept it for a few months but be prepared for a barrage of telephone calls. if they do ring refuse to answer their 'security' questions and insist all communications are in writing or via email, they won't like it but it's not up to them. ;)

 

Ideally they will sell the debt on & when they do you will be able to run rings around the DCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...