Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you to you all, you guys are amazing!! Yes of course i will be making a donation, i am very grateful to you all. Keep up the good work
    • I'm not quite out of the woods yet. The email they sent me also said that I have £290 of arrears and it has been passed onto their collections department. If anything my account should be £10 in credit.  They haven't taken into account the trainers that were returned back in October. The other items have been credited to my account so it looks like I've still got work to do.  They are not very quick to reply to emails, although I've only sent one trying to find more information, and I have no idea what happens next. Half of me want's to get it sorted properly the other half just wants it over with, if that means a default then so be it. 
    • No. It's a public (council maintained) road with some houses in it.   Some other houses back onto it too and those owners have right of way down the road to access the back of their properties.  Theres a few garages with private osp - so one drives out the garage, over the osp, and onto the public side road and then out on to the public main road.  Irrespective of whether the garages are used - the local businesses parking their cars on the private osp are ostensibly preventing cars from accessing the public roads.
    • is the side street solely for access to your garages? who owns the land and thus the road? dx  
    • A local business has been parking on an off-street parking space in front of my garages (in a side street).  I wasn't using them for a while so didnt bother to do anything.  But now a second local business is also using the osp - taking it in turns with the 1st biz.  This has started to nark me.    The employees choose to drive to work.  There is no private parking in their business's street.  But there are some underground secure garages in their street - which cost apx £2.4k/y to rent - which works out apx £6.60/d. (I believe one of the biz owners already rent one for storage purposes).  If the employee had to park on a meter it would cost them £6.60/h - £66 for 10h and have to move every 4h.  They just don't want to pay for parking. I haven't confronted either of them.  Instead I just put 2 clear "no parking" signs in front of the garages. And a note on one of the cars specifically saying that as they don't live or rent in the street and it's private land could they stop parking.   They ignored that.  And just put notes on their dash with a # to call if one needs the car moved.  There is a sign and they've been told in writing to stop parking. And they are just ignoring it.    I don't what a confrontation.    I don't want to go to the expense of bollards (other than maybe traffic plastic ones - but they'll probs just move them).  Council won't do zilch cos it's private land. And police won't get involved - unless I clamp/ tow the cars and then they'd be after me, not the drivers!    What's the best thing to do?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlord requesting one month in advance NON REFUNDABLE


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4504 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am assisting a friend who is looking to rent a nice apartment.....and would like some advice / comment. I have underlined the worrying part of the email...as I was led to believe according to the OFT website that - http://www.oft.gov.uk/news-and-updates/press/2011/88-11

 

"Where a let does not go ahead through no fault of the tenant, the prospective tenant's holding deposit will be refunded in full and within 10 working days"

 

This is an email from the agent......my friend wants this apartment for him and his girlfriend for 2 years (originally wanted 3 years)

"I have spoken to the Landlord and he is happy to accept £1375 for the first year & £1395 for the 2nd year. He would like the holding deposit to be equivalent of 1 ½ month’s rent, which would be your deposit when you move in, and this would be non-refundable if you decide not to go ahead or fail references.

 

With regards to the references, as long as you have a good Landlord reference, a joint income of £42000 and no adverse credit history you will pass references.

If you are willing to go ahead with this he would like this paid by the end of the week to enable us to take the property off of the market. "

By requesting a non refundable deposit surely they are in breach of the OFT's code ? At the end of the day the landlord could just say you had bad references and pocket the money !!....(and by the way my friend DOES have good references but will not be held hostage he likes the apartment but he will walk away if anything is suspect or unreasonable"

Many thanks in advance....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you on that one, it seems a bit suspicious.....

 

It may be perfectly fine, but if it is not, and the deal falls through for any reason (including the one you suggested could happen), it could take an awful long time and a great deal of stress to get the money back....

 

The age old saying caveat emptor can still apply......

  • Haha 1

I am not a solicitor :!::!:

 

Most of my knowledge came from this site :-D:-D

 

If I have been helpful in any way at all .............. Please click my star..... :-(:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OFT's code said it will be refunded if the let doesn't go through and it isn't the fault of the tenant. If they cancel or fail the credit check, that's their fault surely.

 

I have paid a holding deposit 3 times and in all cases it was non-refundable if I pulled out, but refundable if the landlord did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Referencing should only take a few days, especially if all your ducks are in a row in terms of asking your referees to be quick. So the LL does not lose anything near 1.5 months' rent by going through this process, and the process is there to protect him, not the tenant, so is part of the cost of his business.

 

Suggest to the agent that it is a ridiculous proposition, which it is. One option would be to do the referencing before taking the property off the market - they could get the referencing done "by the end of the week" which seems to be the timescale currently on the table, and it only costs 20 quid or so.

 

Ask for a copy of the contract too - what if the contract had something in it that was unreasonable - once LL has the money he can put whatever he likes in the contract and you are forced either to agree to it or lose your money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they cancel or fail the credit check, that's their fault surely.

 

I would suggest it is not, because the criteria are set by the agent/landlord and not the prospective tenant. Typical credit check agencies just return a number between 1 and 999 and the agent will apply some sort of threshold. But the meaning of the number is only known by the credit check company.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Point taken Earthling1, but potentially there isn't anything stopping a landlord from just saying 'your references were bad'....tough luck the deposit goes in my pocket, and I have another 2 or 3 tenants who I am doing the same with !......I completely agree with losing the deposit if the prospective tenant pulls out.....Thanks Steve, that was what I have advised my friend to do...

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK Update.....email sent to the lettings agent who have changed their tone...now strangely enough when the property was viewed it was explained that at the original (lower rent of £1300) that my friend would get the choice of furnished/partly unfurnished or unfurnished......however this email clearly states below that the landlord NOW wants us to pay additional for furnishing....and it was advertised as being furnished or unfurnished !!!

 

Thank you for your email.

 

If the Landlord decided he did not want to go ahead with the tenancy even if you passed references then the money would be refunded.

We carry out our references through a company called Homelet, to be classed as acceptable you would need to fill the criteria as explained in my previous email. If you were acceptable by Homelet but the Landlord decided he was not happy with the references then you would have the money refunded.

 

If you prefer I can carry out the references before you pay the deposit?

 

With regards to the furnishing’s the property is unfurnished, the Landlord would want a higher rental if you require any furniture.(The flat was originally advertised at £1300 per month with a choice of furnished/part furnished or unfurnished) Apologies if this was not explained at your viewing. (it was explained at the viewing that it was the choice of the tenant)

Link to post
Share on other sites

and this would be non-refundable if you decide not to go ahead or fail references.

 

Load of C**P, i've been through loads of letting agents for friends and family and i've never come up against that one. The only thing you pay for up front is the cost for the credit check and maybe there admin fee but other than that no other money should pass to them untill the day you sign the tenancy and only then do you give your deposit over.

 

1 1/2 months rent as a deposit is not unheard of, quite a few places now are doing the same but even then the ones that are will normally drop to 1 month as a deposit.

 

If it was me, i'd run a mile. Sounds like the agents and the lanlord have just found an easy way to make money out of people...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it's a partial fallback, but passing references could still be a bit of a lottery if something has gone wrong with your credit report - as can be seen in their failure to inform tenant of the deal with the furniture agencies can be very slap-dash with their dealings despite people putting up substantial sums of money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...