Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlord requesting one month in advance NON REFUNDABLE


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4505 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am assisting a friend who is looking to rent a nice apartment.....and would like some advice / comment. I have underlined the worrying part of the email...as I was led to believe according to the OFT website that - http://www.oft.gov.uk/news-and-updates/press/2011/88-11

 

"Where a let does not go ahead through no fault of the tenant, the prospective tenant's holding deposit will be refunded in full and within 10 working days"

 

This is an email from the agent......my friend wants this apartment for him and his girlfriend for 2 years (originally wanted 3 years)

"I have spoken to the Landlord and he is happy to accept £1375 for the first year & £1395 for the 2nd year. He would like the holding deposit to be equivalent of 1 ½ month’s rent, which would be your deposit when you move in, and this would be non-refundable if you decide not to go ahead or fail references.

 

With regards to the references, as long as you have a good Landlord reference, a joint income of £42000 and no adverse credit history you will pass references.

If you are willing to go ahead with this he would like this paid by the end of the week to enable us to take the property off of the market. "

By requesting a non refundable deposit surely they are in breach of the OFT's code ? At the end of the day the landlord could just say you had bad references and pocket the money !!....(and by the way my friend DOES have good references but will not be held hostage he likes the apartment but he will walk away if anything is suspect or unreasonable"

Many thanks in advance....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you on that one, it seems a bit suspicious.....

 

It may be perfectly fine, but if it is not, and the deal falls through for any reason (including the one you suggested could happen), it could take an awful long time and a great deal of stress to get the money back....

 

The age old saying caveat emptor can still apply......

  • Haha 1

I am not a solicitor :!::!:

 

Most of my knowledge came from this site :-D:-D

 

If I have been helpful in any way at all .............. Please click my star..... :-(:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OFT's code said it will be refunded if the let doesn't go through and it isn't the fault of the tenant. If they cancel or fail the credit check, that's their fault surely.

 

I have paid a holding deposit 3 times and in all cases it was non-refundable if I pulled out, but refundable if the landlord did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Referencing should only take a few days, especially if all your ducks are in a row in terms of asking your referees to be quick. So the LL does not lose anything near 1.5 months' rent by going through this process, and the process is there to protect him, not the tenant, so is part of the cost of his business.

 

Suggest to the agent that it is a ridiculous proposition, which it is. One option would be to do the referencing before taking the property off the market - they could get the referencing done "by the end of the week" which seems to be the timescale currently on the table, and it only costs 20 quid or so.

 

Ask for a copy of the contract too - what if the contract had something in it that was unreasonable - once LL has the money he can put whatever he likes in the contract and you are forced either to agree to it or lose your money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they cancel or fail the credit check, that's their fault surely.

 

I would suggest it is not, because the criteria are set by the agent/landlord and not the prospective tenant. Typical credit check agencies just return a number between 1 and 999 and the agent will apply some sort of threshold. But the meaning of the number is only known by the credit check company.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Point taken Earthling1, but potentially there isn't anything stopping a landlord from just saying 'your references were bad'....tough luck the deposit goes in my pocket, and I have another 2 or 3 tenants who I am doing the same with !......I completely agree with losing the deposit if the prospective tenant pulls out.....Thanks Steve, that was what I have advised my friend to do...

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK Update.....email sent to the lettings agent who have changed their tone...now strangely enough when the property was viewed it was explained that at the original (lower rent of £1300) that my friend would get the choice of furnished/partly unfurnished or unfurnished......however this email clearly states below that the landlord NOW wants us to pay additional for furnishing....and it was advertised as being furnished or unfurnished !!!

 

Thank you for your email.

 

If the Landlord decided he did not want to go ahead with the tenancy even if you passed references then the money would be refunded.

We carry out our references through a company called Homelet, to be classed as acceptable you would need to fill the criteria as explained in my previous email. If you were acceptable by Homelet but the Landlord decided he was not happy with the references then you would have the money refunded.

 

If you prefer I can carry out the references before you pay the deposit?

 

With regards to the furnishing’s the property is unfurnished, the Landlord would want a higher rental if you require any furniture.(The flat was originally advertised at £1300 per month with a choice of furnished/part furnished or unfurnished) Apologies if this was not explained at your viewing. (it was explained at the viewing that it was the choice of the tenant)

Link to post
Share on other sites

and this would be non-refundable if you decide not to go ahead or fail references.

 

Load of C**P, i've been through loads of letting agents for friends and family and i've never come up against that one. The only thing you pay for up front is the cost for the credit check and maybe there admin fee but other than that no other money should pass to them untill the day you sign the tenancy and only then do you give your deposit over.

 

1 1/2 months rent as a deposit is not unheard of, quite a few places now are doing the same but even then the ones that are will normally drop to 1 month as a deposit.

 

If it was me, i'd run a mile. Sounds like the agents and the lanlord have just found an easy way to make money out of people...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it's a partial fallback, but passing references could still be a bit of a lottery if something has gone wrong with your credit report - as can be seen in their failure to inform tenant of the deal with the furniture agencies can be very slap-dash with their dealings despite people putting up substantial sums of money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...