Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with stopping the enforcement of a £800 CCJ


Kelly1972
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4458 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi.

 

I am an Australian Citizen who married a UK national last year. I currently reside in the UK and have a CCJ out against me by an ex-friend who says I owe him £800 for an unpaid phone bill from 2008. He bullied me into signing the court form back in 2009 & I started making repayments as he told me that having a CCJ could effect my visa status (and I was naive enough to believe him). I returned to Australia for a while in 2010/2011, and now I am back in the UK as I returned to marry my partner. The creditor (my ex-friend) has now re-established contact and it threatening me with enforcing the CCJ. Due to the terms of my visa, I am NOT allowed to work or receive any government funds while I am here in the UK. I have no assets at all as all of my belongings (apart from clothes) are back home in Australia. My husband is supporting me while we make our plans to emigrate to Australia. He is self employed and is on working tax credits as his work has been in serious decline over the last 12 months. I have no way of paying the debt back and would like to know what I can do to stop the creditor enforcing the CCJ. Can I fill out a N244 form and explain my circumstances? Can the creditor come after my husband and try and get the money from him?

 

Please help :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not clear what "court" form you signed, was it an agreement to repay and was there a County Court Claim?

You could apply to have the CCJ set aside if you were not aware of the claim which would give you the opportunity to dispute the debt. If you accept the debt you could apply for a variation but with no income you have nothing to offer. Both of these are covered by N244.

You could apply for a Debt Relief Order but I am not sure how your immigration status would be affected.

Your ex-friend will spend a lot of money attempting to enforce the judgement and most methods would fail:

You are not employed so an attachment of earnings order can't be made.

You have no money in a bank account to be claimed.

You have no possessions for a bailiff to seize.

When are you returning to Australia?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot for your help thus far. I signed the agreement to pay form (I think it was an N9A?), without lodging a defence and started making small, regular payments (just under £200) until I returned back to Australia.

 

I have tried reasoning with him, but he won't accept the fact that I am in a difficult position at the moment and have absolutely no way of paying the debt. Not to mention, now that I am more savvy to my rights in the UK, I now know that having this dispute with this person cannot, in any way, affect my visa status.

 

Yesterday, I received a form from the Northampton County Court which was a 'Notice of Transfer of Proceedings' and simply said: 'This claim has been transfered to the Northampton County Court for enforcement'. This may sound naive; but what does that letter mean? If he does not have a CCJ against me (as I initially signed the N9A form, although gave no defence), what should my next step be? As I said, I have tried to reason with the person, however he does not want to know, and has sent me a few rather threatening emails in the process, so I would prefer to keep my contact with him to a minimum.

 

Thanks again in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you returned the Admission form you will now have a CCJ against you.

 

The file being transferred for enforcement means that he is going to apply to send the bailiffs etc round to enforce the CCJ.

 

Not sure about that, if so..then what are the forthcoming proceedings about ? It is possible when you have a CCJ to ask the court to 'call in' the debtor to answer financial info. about themselves but dont think thats the case here.

 

We really need to see/know about the original forms and what excatly is going on, its not clear there is a CCJ or not or whether there was some sort of consent order/agreement to pay, but has since been broken... or even if it was as pointed out what excatly any enforcement would achieve if you have no job, no possessions and no property.

 

Perhaps apply to Equifax/Experian to get credit report and seem if any CCJ. ?

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, thanks for the reply. I guess I need to act pretty quickly to prevent baliffs appearing at the house, as this seems quite daunting and something I do not want to have to go through! As I mentioned previously, all I own in this country are some clothes & shoes in my wardrobe! I do not have any assets, jewellery etc. The house and all of the assets in it are owned by my husband and were all here before I moved in and we got married. As part of my visa limitations, I am unable to work and have no recourse to public funds, so I could not even be able to pay for the debt out of any possible benefits or gain employment to do so. It seems like a bit of a stalemate situation. Will I receive notification prior to any enforcement being carried out? ie: being sent a letter advising me that baliffs have been instructed?

 

What should I do next? Should I go ahead and fill out an N244 form? Someone has advised me that I must use an N245 form as he already has a judgement against me, so I am a little confused as to what to do. I will probably try and get an appointment at my local Advice Bureau to get help with filling out and filing the form correctly.

 

Thanks again in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy. I believe the form that I signed was an agreement to pay the debtor, rather than having the courts decide and enforce me to pay. The last forms I received (back in 2008, although I have obviously been in and out of the country since then and changed addresses), were blue forms from the Northampton courts, giving me 3 options; a) agree to the full amount and arrange to make payment in installments, or b) dispute the amount and agree to pay what you believe to be the amount owed, or c) refute the claim all together.

 

I signed the N9a form, an agreement was made to pay in installments and I proceeded to make direct payments to the debtor's bank account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well..yes you should be informed that firstly you have a CCJ against you and that you must pay Mr X £x amount.

 

N244 is just generic court application form and can be used for anything, not sure of its relevance now..you could of for example request that a judgement be overturned becuase you didnt receive paperwork at the time, but not sure if thats the case here.

 

N245 is to list your finicial situation, which it apperars you could almost put at zero, this is to be used after judgement and I assume a CCJ has been granted, but we are not 100% sure on this and even if at this late stage it can be used, have you a local court ?..whilst they cant give legal advice they are ogften very helpful on court procedures, etc..Im visiting my local one on Monday with a barrage of questions :)

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I found confusing is that, when I called to speak to a debt advice company about the matter, they told me that my only option was to use the N245 form and request for an adjustment to the amount I can pay (in installments), and would still have to agree to make repayments, even if it was a £1 a month. How can I possibly be expected to make repayments with no forms of income available to me? I can, of course, borrow £1 a month of my husband to make such a repayment, however wouldn't this just seem farcical to a County Court judge who would probably think I am just wasting his/her's time?! I certainly don't want to turn this whole thing into a circus!

 

ugh, I am so confused and just want to get some sort of resolution to this matter :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy. I believe the form that I signed was an agreement to pay the debtor, rather than having the courts decide and enforce me to pay. The last forms I received (back in 2008, although I have obviously been in and out of the country since then and changed addresses), were blue forms from the Northampton courts, giving me 3 options; a) agree to the full amount and arrange to make payment in installments, or b) dispute the amount and agree to pay what you believe to be the amount owed, or c) refute the claim all together.

 

I signed the N9a form, an agreement was made to pay in installments and I proceeded to make direct payments to the debtor's bank account.

 

HHmm..Then I'd guess a CCJ was not granted, but the claimant could apply for one, or apply for judgement/and/or enforcement should the agreement be broken, maybe we are at that stage now. I'd guess a N244 is too late unless you have a valid reason why the agreement should be re-visited...

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy. I believe the form that I signed was an agreement to pay the debtor, rather than having the courts decide and enforce me to pay. The last forms I received (back in 2008, although I have obviously been in and out of the country since then and changed addresses), were blue forms from the Northampton courts, giving me 3 options; a) agree to the full amount and arrange to make payment in installments, or b) dispute the amount and agree to pay what you believe to be the amount owed, or c) refute the claim all together.

 

I signed the N9a form, an agreement was made to pay in installments and I proceeded to make direct payments to the debtor's bank account.

 

 

By returning the N9A you are admitting to the debt and making an offer to pay.

 

There is a CCJ as you can't transfer a file for enforcement if there is no CCJ to enforce!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I found confusing is that, when I called to speak to a debt advice company about the matter, they told me that my only option was to use the N245 form and request for an adjustment to the amount I can pay (in installments), and would still have to agree to make repayments, even if it was a £1 a month. How can I possibly be expected to make repayments with no forms of income available to me? I can, of course, borrow £1 a month of my husband to make such a repayment, however wouldn't this just seem farcical to a County Court judge who would probably think I am just wasting his/her's time?! I certainly don't want to turn this whole thing into a circus!

 

ugh, I am so confused and just want to get some sort of resolution to this matter :(

 

Well..you have admitted the civil claim so in reality you cant escape from it..many years back we'd lock people up for debts..or ship 'em to Australia :).

 

I'd guess N245 would be best option, if you put £1 a month you'll soon be buggering off anyway. I'm paying various credit cards at only £1 a month so some accept it.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, thanks again everyone. I will get on with a N245 form. Does the person HAVE TO accept my offer of payment (once all of my circumstances are explained) or is it decided by a judge?

 

 

Payments are set by the Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...