Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, You can't make EVRi investigate something. The only thing you could potentially look to do is take EVRi to court for the value of the lost parcel, however with a value of only £25 there will be limited point to doing that.
    • Is the letter headed Letter of Claim/before Claim or similar? If not, it sounds like more of the threatogram chain. If you're not sure, post up an anonymised copy of the letter and we'll check. HB
    • So guess what, we have received a final demand letter for £100. It states if payment is not made by 11/06 they will have no option but to forward the case to their litigation dept with a view to commence County Court Proceedings. So just wondering if anyone has any advice. Do we ignore this? or do we need to take action? Thanks 
    • hi dx, thanks for helping just re-reading everything this morning and I must have missed this one from uncle in his thread "What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. "  are you in disagreement with this based on your last sentence?
    • Thanks for the reply and clarification, that might just explain why in my case contact has pretty much ceased. Though with such companies it doesn't mean they won't ever threaten to return to court as a tool to force one's hand if they feel they are not self informed on their chances etc.  But concerning how last year they tried to use the CCJ to get a charging order and the court granted an intirum order on our mortgage using the CCJ that would have been a good 2-3 months beyond the 6 years, should the court not have checked the age of the CCJ in the first case or would they always grant an interim order simply off the back of a CCJ being produced without even checking the age of it?.  Had I not defended that action at the time they may well have got a default using a CCJ older than 6 years which could be a concern going forwards. At the time when I contacted the court to question the paperwork for a final order application the clerk suggested people don't get informed when companies apply for interim charging orders, they are automatic if a claimant has a CCJ and people only get contacted once a date for a final order application goes through. kind of begs the question if such companies can continue a seemingly backdoor method to attempt default action if un-defended if the initial application doesn't need to check the age of a CCJ?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

And another train penalty issue


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4513 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Will try to keep it brief. Few months ago I travelled from Uni to home for the weekend. Bought normal off peak anytime return (with 16-25 discount card) ticket. Anyhow the line that I needed to travel back home on on the Sunday was having maintainance work and the journey back would have been a nightmare. I decided to travel back early Monday Morning when everything was as it should be. We did check on the website and offpeak tickets were available for the journey I had intended to take on the Monday morning.

 

Travelled from Liverpool St. to Chelmsford on the Monday morning. I had to go through the 'manned' entrance as I had a large suitcase and the ticket collector said my ticket was not valid. Wanted £40. I didn't have it so paid £10 and they said they would write to me regarding the balance and my right to appeal. I went to give my uni address but the guy insisted on my home address.

 

When I next visited home there was a letter there asking for the balance and details of how to appeal. I appealed online and have now received a letter stating that as my appeal was submitted more than 28 days after the fine (because it was sent to my home address) then they could not consider my appeal.

 

I have now just recieved another letter saying that I did not pay it within given time it has gone up to £70.

 

What I did query in my appeal that they would not consider is that the ticket was accepted in London as valid, yet 40 minutes later its not valid. Surely if I wasnt allowed to use it for that journey it should have alerted me prior to boarding the train. Also even now I can go online and purchase the same ticket I had, for the journey at that time on a Monday morning.

 

Any advice as to where I can go to appeal my lack of appeal !! would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Can you remember which train you took and the origin/destination and price of the ticket?

 

Yes I have the tickets here and the receipt I was given for the £10 I paid. Something else I have just noticed is that the receipt says its a penalty for travelling from the stop prior to the one I got off at and not the one that I got on at. Don't know if that is relevant tho.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I have the tickets here and the receipt I was given for the £10 I paid. Something else I have just noticed is that the receipt says its a penalty for travelling from the stop prior to the one I got off at and not the one that I got on at. Don't know if that is relevant tho.

 

Sorry, I don't know what you mean here.

 

Did you have a ticket from and to the right stations please?

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So it would appear that you were issued a penalty fare and only paid £10 towards the £40 fare required, Why did you not appeal the penalty fare at the time? Im unclear as to why they would have told you to wait to hear from them when the info regarding paying and appealing is on the penalty fare notice. If they have turned down your appeal already you really are best just paying what is being asked im affraid, It seems harsh i know but notice can be cancelled and returned to TOC for prosecution.

 

When you started your jouney at london did the ticket get rejected?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I have the tickets here and the receipt I was given for the £10 I paid. Something else I have just noticed is that the receipt says its a penalty for travelling from the stop prior to the one I got off at and not the one that I got on at. Don't know if that is relevant tho.

 

Ok, so which train did you take, what ticket did you buy and how much did it cost? I'm trying to establish the validity of the ticket.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will try and answer all questions in one post.

 

The ticket I bought was offpeak anytime return, purchased at Chelmsford station on a Friday for travel to and from Liverpool Street Station. Ticket was £12.35 (before my discount). It is valid for one month from purchase and states that on the ticket. I was travelling back the following Monday.

 

My reason for not appealing it earlier was that I was told I would be contacted. Suppose I should have chased it up sooner myself. What is really puzzling me as I said earlier, I can buy the very same ticket for journey at that time of the day so how can it not be valid. It was accepted in the barrier at Liverpool Street Station when I boarded the train.

 

Also as the only proof of id with my address on it at the time was with my home address and not uni address on it so that was the only address he would accept. Only get home every few weeks. My parents said bring the paperwork home next time and we will look at it. Course by the time I got home the letter was already there with the penalty for not paying within 21 days. Looks like a costly journey for me.

 

Also looking on the receipt it says the journey is from Shenfield to Chelmsford. Shenfield is a stop on the train, but not the one that I got on at.

 

In hindsight I should have questioned it more fully at the time, but rushing not wanting to be late back to uni etc. I will probably end up paying it but it galls me that I still do not know why it was not valid. Guy just kept saying it was the wrong ticket and I can't see how it was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Return part of Off-Peak and Super Off-Peak Return tickets are valid for travel within one calendar month of the outward journey. Travel is allowed until 0230 on the day following the last day of validity. If you are still travelling at 0230 then you may stay on the train to complete that part of the journey but no further break of journey is allowed and all travel must be completed by 1200. Not valid on any train departing London Liverpool Street or London Kings Cross before 0930 and not between 1629 or 1834 inclusive (1900 from London Kings Cross) although travel is permitted on the 1636 from London Liverpool Street to Braintree, for destinations Hatfield Peverel to Braintree inclusive. Hopes this will clarify.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Return part of Off-Peak and Super Off-Peak Return tickets are valid for travel within one calendar month of the outward journey. Travel is allowed until 0230 on the day following the last day of validity. If you are still travelling at 0230 then you may stay on the train to complete that part of the journey but no further break of journey is allowed and all travel must be completed by 1200. Not valid on any train departing London Liverpool Street or London Kings Cross before 0930 and not between 1629 or 1834 inclusive (1900 from London Kings Cross) although travel is permitted on the 1636 from London Liverpool Street to Braintree, for destinations Hatfield Peverel to Braintree inclusive. Hopes this will clarify.

 

Awww that would be it then. Thanks for that. Shame the machine at Liverpool St. didn't spit the ticket back out at me. But at least I now know why. Better raid the penny jar :-(.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you cannot be penalty fared for being on a restricted ticket, it is against the PF rules, just to get the facts straight here, did you have an off-peak ticket and travel in peak time? if so the PF should not have been issued and you should only have been charged the difference between the fare you paid and the ticket required at that time. If you had appealed at the time you would almost certainly have succeeded in your appeal, now that the 21 days has passed you may be on dodgy ground, it may be worth writing to the TOC's customer services and pointing this out to see what they say.

Views expressed in this forum by me are my own personal opinion and you take it on face value! I make any comments to the best of my knowledge but you take my advice at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you cannot be penalty fared for being on a restricted ticket, it is against the PF rules, just to get the facts straight here, did you have an off-peak ticket and travel in peak time? if so the PF should not have been issued and you should only have been charged the difference between the fare you paid and the ticket required at that time. If you had appealed at the time you would almost certainly have succeeded in your appeal, now that the 21 days has passed you may be on dodgy ground, it may be worth writing to the TOC's customer services and pointing this out to see what they say.

 

Yes thats right it was a offpeak return ticket that I was travelling on. And looking at what is posted above I should not have travelled on it before 09.30AM. As you say probably will have to just pay up, but worth a letter if only to have a moan :-).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...