Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Like
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Charge for payment (Council Tax)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4492 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We have received a charge for payment, delivered by Sheriff Officers. I emailed the Sheriff Officers with a payment proposal. They eventually replied stating

 

Whilst no payments are refused, we are unable to set a payment plan on your account at the rate of £xx.xx per month due to the fact we hold no information on your current financial circumstances.

 

..

..

 

Are you both currently working, and if so who are your current employers?

 

What is your net pay and how often are you paid?

 

Are you in receipt of any benefits?

 

Who do you currently hold a bank account with?

 

Do you own or rent your property, and how much do you pay?

 

Please note that failure to arrange suitable repayments may result in further Legal action being taken for recovery, the costs of any such action will be due by you.

 

 

First question: Do I have to provide the requested information?

 

Looking at the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) (Scotland) Regulations 1992, I don't think I do. To me it suggests that I have a duty toprovide the information to the Local Authority.

 

Duty of debtor to supply information

 

31.—(1) Where, under Schedule 8 to the Act, a summary warrant or a decree in an action for payment has been granted, the debtor against whom it was granted shall, during such time as the amount in respect of which the warrant or decree was granted remains wholly or partly unpaid, be under a duty to supply, in accordance with paragraph (5), relevant information to the levying authority on whose application the warrant or decree was granted.

 

(2) Relevant information is such information as fulfils the following conditions:—

 

(a)it is in the debtor’s possession or control;

(b)the levying authority request him by notice to supply it; and

©it falls within paragraph (3).

(3) Information falls within this paragraph if it is specified in the notice mentioned in sub-paragraph (b) of paragraph (2) and is information as to—

 

(a)the name of any employer of the debtor;

(b)the address of the employer’s premises at or from which the debtor works;

©where there are in Scotland no such premises, the address of any one place of business of the employer within Scotland;

(d)the national insurance number of the debtor;

(e)the name of any bank having a place of business in Great Britain with which the debtor maintains an account (either in his own name or in the names of himself and another person or persons);

(f)the address of the office at which any such account is maintained and, if that office is outside Scotland, the address of the principal office in Scotland, or (if none) in Great Britain, of the bank in question;

(g)the number of any such account:

(h)the name and address of any other person or persons who are jointly and severally liable with the debtor to make payment of the whole or any part of the amount in respect of which the warrant or decree was granted.

(4) In paragraph (3), “bank” means any institution authorised under the Banking Act 1987(1), the National Savings Bank or a building society incorporated (or deemed to be incorporated) under the Building Societies Act 1986(2).

 

(5) Information must be supplied in writing within 14 days of the day on which the request is made by the levying authority.

 

 

Second question: Who are Sheriff Officers to decide if a payment level is acceptable based on my financial circumstances?

 

Third question: At a push I could make double the payment originally offered. Should I apply for a time to pay order now, or wait to see if the Sheriff Officers accept my revised offer?

Edited by craigers
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes afraid so but i would alos completed the time to pay order and return it to the court as the SO'd will still proceed with the charge for payment allowing a bank arrestment etc

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?185249-Have-you-received-a-charge-for-payment-arrestment-summary-warrant

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. If you make an application for time to pay it wouldn't be a Sheriff Officer that determines the rate of payment, it would be the court:

 

http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/scotland/factsheet.php?page=06_time_to_pay_directions_and_orders

 

Applying for time to pay can prevent dilliegence action being brought against you.

 

As an alternative, and if you have other debts, you could also consider a Debt Arrangement Scheme:

 

http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/scotland/factsheet.php?page=22_debt_arrangement_scheme

 

If you would like further information the Scotland section of our website can be found here:

 

http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/scotland/index.php

 

Best wishes,

 

National Debtline

  • Haha 1

For Free, Confidential and Independent advice: 0808 808 4000

Monday - Friday 9am to 9pm // Saturday 9.30am to 1pm // 24-hour voicemail. Please leave a message to request an information pack. http://www.nationaldebtline.org // http://www.mymoneysteps.org

Link to post
Share on other sites

I contacted the Sheriff Officers with a new offer, twice the previous offer. I also asked what authority they have to decide on a suitable repayment level and to ask for income/employment/etc details. They replied with an admission they have no authority to decide what is a suitable repayment level. They then go on to say that they do not have to accept any payment arrangement offered.. the info requested is to help them in their final decision to whether they accept an arrangement. quite how my employer/bank details/national insurance number helps that i do not know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry i did not make my post clear - when a charge for payment has been passed by a court and if no arrangement is made then you would need to provide the details as then it becomes a part of the court process.

 

Most of them will not accept a payment arrangement if they think they can get more out of you. Any i did over the phone they never agreed with but when i stopped calling and made it written they accepted it every time. Also they prefer wages arrestments as this is a guaranteed payment so i would not offer them any more than it would be through a wages arrestment - saying that they has been a few caggers who have opted to go for a wages arrestment just so then it was paid etc.

 

Have you got the time to pay order back to the court yet?

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I gave the Sheriff Officers a quick breakdown of our income and expenditure, but that seemed to go over the girl's head. I notice that the dsa2 only asks for financial details, not employer details etc. A case of the Sheriff Officers overstepping the mark?

 

Haven't submitted the dsa2 yet. Do my partner and I have to complete a dsa2 each? How does it work with regards to council tax due over several years? Do I put it all on one dsa2, or have to do it individually for each financial year?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi It depends on what the charge for payment is statingt - they normally lump all your council tax accounts together to give you the total figure, if the cahrge for payment is in joint names then you just complete one DSA 2 with joint details - what i would also advised is not to use the income and expenditure on this as it not detailed enough - i would advise to print your own - there is help with this in the templates on CAG - and on the dsa2 score over and write please see attached details i and e

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...