Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you're set on pursuing the receiver then a complaint to his governing body (if any) might be a sensible low risk first step. You need to confirm what qualifications he actually has. I don't believe an LPA Receiver necessarily needs to be a licensed insolvency practioner, although he may be. Or he may a chartered surveyor. I note you say "LPA" and "fixed charge" receiver, but aren't those two different appointments with different remits? What relevant powers are given in the mortgage terms and security? Or if that's unclear then how was the appointment described to you? Ducking back to the comment I made earlier, you consulted a solicitor who advised a claim against the receiver. How did he advise that you do so?   Some background reading (accepting it's from 2013 and you may be working off more recent preceded overturning this) .. LPA receivers owe very limited duty to borrowers; a reminder WWW.WRIGHTHASSALL.CO.UK As lenders rely more and more on their powers to appoint an LPA Receiver, a recent case has clarified the Receiver’s obligations, both to the lender and its borrower.  
    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Justice v NatWest


Justice
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6388 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Firstly, thanks to all who have contributed information to this site, to date - it appears full of excellent guidance :) Have been reading through the forums for a fair few weeks.

 

To re-cap on my current situation...

 

I sent my initial, pre-lim letter 14/09/2006

- Received generic response, stating that matter referred to Customer Relations Unit.

- Received computer generated "from" Stuart Higley (seen in other threads), advising that charges are fair and to be sure that Proceedings are served on the London addressed.

 

LBA to be sent shortly, at 14 day deadline...

 

Keep watching!! :D

Forum posts are not legal advice; are for educational and discussion purposes only, and are not a substitute for proper consultation with a qualified financial or legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am preparing to send my LBA...

 

In the template, it states; "very disappointed that you have failed to respond to my letter of the [XXDATEXX]."

 

I have received a letter from both the original receivers (an acknowledgement of receipt) and also the regular letter from Stuart Higley, so the above opening paragraph does not really apply(?).

 

Are there any suggestions as to alterations?

 

Thanks :)

Forum posts are not legal advice; are for educational and discussion purposes only, and are not a substitute for proper consultation with a qualified financial or legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i thanked the bank for replying my letter instead the template opening. at the end of the day, it's only the opening not too important i supposed.

Apple

 

NatWest - MCOL issued 31/07/06; NW acknowledged 03/08/06; NW Defended 31/08/06; Cobbetts offered 60% 27/09/06; NW settled in FULL!!!! 07/10/06

Halifax cc - LBA sent 27/07/06; No Chance

First Direct - Data Protection Act sent 25/07/06; PRELIM sent 07/08/06; Offer received 12/08/06; Refused 18/08/06; 2nd offer rec'd 23/08/06 £1405 without interest (£172) and we accepted:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

i thanked the bank for replying my letter instead the template opening. at the end of the day, it's only the opening not too important i supposed.

 

Thanks for your response, elppa :)

Forum posts are not legal advice; are for educational and discussion purposes only, and are not a substitute for proper consultation with a qualified financial or legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

your welcome

Apple

 

NatWest - MCOL issued 31/07/06; NW acknowledged 03/08/06; NW Defended 31/08/06; Cobbetts offered 60% 27/09/06; NW settled in FULL!!!! 07/10/06

Halifax cc - LBA sent 27/07/06; No Chance

First Direct - Data Protection Act sent 25/07/06; PRELIM sent 07/08/06; Offer received 12/08/06; Refused 18/08/06; 2nd offer rec'd 23/08/06 £1405 without interest (£172) and we accepted:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Received response to LBA today from Sir Higley.

 

Same as others have received; along the lines of "not able to add anything constructive."

 

Not long 'til claim is filed :D

Forum posts are not legal advice; are for educational and discussion purposes only, and are not a substitute for proper consultation with a qualified financial or legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Show Time!!!

  • Confused 1

Apple

 

NatWest - MCOL issued 31/07/06; NW acknowledged 03/08/06; NW Defended 31/08/06; Cobbetts offered 60% 27/09/06; NW settled in FULL!!!! 07/10/06

Halifax cc - LBA sent 27/07/06; No Chance

First Direct - Data Protection Act sent 25/07/06; PRELIM sent 07/08/06; Offer received 12/08/06; Refused 18/08/06; 2nd offer rec'd 23/08/06 £1405 without interest (£172) and we accepted:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Show Time!!!

 

Haha!! It's looking that way! :D

 

Have been drafting the N1 during the last few days in preparation! ;)

 

 

 

EDIT: Also to add, I have just read your thread regarding your own battle with NatWest - made excellent reading and well done on getting your settlement :)

Forum posts are not legal advice; are for educational and discussion purposes only, and are not a substitute for proper consultation with a qualified financial or legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is a template for particular in the FAQs or i have a sample in my thread written and suggested by someone

Apple

 

NatWest - MCOL issued 31/07/06; NW acknowledged 03/08/06; NW Defended 31/08/06; Cobbetts offered 60% 27/09/06; NW settled in FULL!!!! 07/10/06

Halifax cc - LBA sent 27/07/06; No Chance

First Direct - Data Protection Act sent 25/07/06; PRELIM sent 07/08/06; Offer received 12/08/06; Refused 18/08/06; 2nd offer rec'd 23/08/06 £1405 without interest (£172) and we accepted:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am currently drafting the text of my N1 (hard copy)...

 

Could I please ask what others have input to the "Brief details of claim" and "Value" sections on the first page?

 

Any advice appreciated :)

 

J.

 

P.S. I have been reading through the relevant forums and will continue to do so, but due to the sheer size of the info, having trouble nailing the above!

Forum posts are not legal advice; are for educational and discussion purposes only, and are not a substitute for proper consultation with a qualified financial or legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Any responses to my query above, regarding completion of the N1 form??

 

Saw an excellently worded "Brief details of claim" in a thread just before my last post of this threads, but now unable to locate and the Search function is not able to assist...

 

...and also would like some guidance regarding the "Value" section and how much information is needed in there to pacify the court process?

 

Am trying to get this to the court in the next week, so any responses would be grately appreciated!

 

TIA,

 

J.

Forum posts are not legal advice; are for educational and discussion purposes only, and are not a substitute for proper consultation with a qualified financial or legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For brief details of claim see:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/681-4-particulars-claim-n1.html

 

For claim value put in the amount you are claiming plus the interest and attach a copy of your schedule of charges.

 

You need to print off three copies of each. One for yourself and two for the court. The court will then send a copy to Natwest.

 

Hope this helps

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So, I amend the Particulars of Claim, as per your link, into a brief-er version for the first page of the N1...?

 

For claim value put in the amount you are claiming plus the interest and attach a copy of your schedule of charges.

 

Excellent - will do, thanks :)

 

You need to print off three copies of each. One for yourself and two for the court. The court will then send a copy to Natwest.

 

Will do :)

 

Hope this helps

 

It certainly does - Many thanks, Zoot

Forum posts are not legal advice; are for educational and discussion purposes only, and are not a substitute for proper consultation with a qualified financial or legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...