Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

today i was sacked! I need to fight it!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4548 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All

 

I may have posted before, but I had to change my user name: I could really use some good advice,

 

I am awaiting a decision from my employer regarding which I suspect will result in dismissal not to go into detail,

it would take a whole day to explain how we got to this point!

And to note I am not guilty of wrong doing!

 

my question is, can I go to my employer and ask for a Compromise Agreement or/and an off record conversation in order to put closer to the current situation?

 

Before they come back to me with a decision?

I will be taking them to a tribunal for unfair dismissal should I need too,

but I don’t want to, I just want to end it and move on so can I do this or do I have to sit and wait for the decision?

 

Hopefully it will make sense, I’ve got a feeling they are waiting for me to make a move.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that you put a grievance in, that is usually the first route - but of course you must phone ACAS as explain the entire situation to them.

 

You will probably end up going down the route of a tribunal should your employer not follow the ACAS Code, then they will probably present you with a Compromise Agreement to avoid the Courts.

 

You must have a solicitor to certificate the agreement. Do call ACAS who will explain all the best routes for you - they are excellent! good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I am in a state of shock: If I give to much detail the employer will know who I am etc it is so specific, I have not done anything wrong and have worked hard and been a top employee for a number of years, never had any issues or problems before and i am so mad i had successfully gained new employement but of course the reference will advise of this so that will fall over, great christmas !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

Of course it's your choice how much information you give, but if you don't give us much to go on it will restrict how much advice is forthcoming. Only you know how specific your case is.

 

Have you spoken to ACAS as advised? And have you looked on the Tribunals Service website? I believe they're very helpful and you can also ring them.

 

Hopefully the guys will have more advice for you.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know! in my letter they have made a point on what they are putting or will put on any future references which i thought was odd where do i stand with references does it depend on what the new employer asks or what have you? i just was so happy yesterday getting a new job and now that wont happen either, but that aside i need to fight this i did not do any wrong doing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

If disciplinary proceedings have been instigated then you can approach them to request a compromise agreement. Do they have an incentive to enter into it, though? Usually employers use a compromise agreement to bypass grievance or disciplinary proceedings and avoid management time and expense. If you think they have a legal liability to you though, they may agree, if only on a commercial basis.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you haven't done anything wrong then you must calm down and be methodical in your approach to what you want to achieve out of this mess.

 

It would be beneficial for you to start the grievance procedure with your current employer. Sending a copy to HR department by Recorded Delivery and keeping a copy for your records. You should highlight the positive points which you have contributed to the department (where applicable) and what you feel you have provided within your area of expertise and why you feel you now find yourself in the position you are at the moment. You do not feel that the current conduct being received from your line manager is appropriate.

 

There is nothing stopping you from starting the new job even if they do want a reference, that will come later.

 

Telephone ACAS and explain all the details to them for specific guidance and you must do that sooner rather than later. You will feel so much better for it once you have.

 

ACAS are brilliant at being mediators in these type of situations and will handle the point of employment reference if that is what you require.

 

Even if your new employer says that the job is subject to references received, if it is a large organisation the reference can sometimes just be red tape and fall by the wayside once they see what you can do in the position you have been employed for.

 

Stay strong and be confident. You will get through this.

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning All,

 

I have been thinking about my current situation,

 

Yesterday I was dismissed which I am trying to deal with and will continue to work through as best I can

 

But moving forward I was offered a new job at the beginning of the week (Before I was dismissed)

and I dont know what to do for the best,

 

I got the job via a recruitment agency so havent apart from the interviews had any direct dealings with the new employer

- Do I go to them, best honest, explain the situation in the hope they accept this and continue to take me on?

Or do I continue with the process and cross the bridge of references once they get them back.

I.E dismissal gross miscounduct which I do beleive my ex employer will make a point of stating this they have made a point of saying they will do on my dissmissal letter!

 

So I am not sure what to do for the best, of course I dont want to start of with a new employer and then get sacked from them due to bad references etc but at the same time I dont want to have that conversation before hand either!

 

Sorry for going on....

Link to post
Share on other sites

im in the same situation...but ive always worked two jobs so can hide this particular employment....do you need them for a reference? when was ur last position? can you use that job? or academic references? an employer is only allowed to give a factual reference, but this can include the dismissal and reason for it....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All, it looks like the new jon I found will be withdrawn due to the reference in which was supplied. Can I ask my ex-employer exactly what information they would put on a reference I guess it changes depending on the questions asked? They are not wanting to enter into a compromise agreement at this stage so I wont be able to go down that road. Its not fair, they sack me but also stop me from getting a new role!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you saying that your old employer has provided a bad reference or that the agency would not be able to put you forward because of the situation with the reference?

 

Have you approached ACAS yet about this situation?

 

A relative of mine was in a similar position few months ago and we discussed it with ACAS because their employer wouldn't compromise but once ACAS were involved it was a different story. They compromised immediately and the reference was agreed with both parties. It's worth a try.

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

The employer gave a factual reference, dates to and from, job title, and reason for leaving: I.e. Dismissal gross misconduct (I am mad at this as I’ve not yet had my appeal, and also I have in writing they have said they don’t have proof either way, so they have based their decision on assumptions and hearsay, not the facts in black and white) although the case is much more in depth then just that! So my new employer who I got the job with before I was dismissed have now withdrawn due to the above.

 

I have called ACAS, and to be honest they were not that helpful, they said I could ask for an off record conversation to determine if I was able to organise a compromise agreement, which I did, however my ex employer did not respond, not even to say no, the next day I was dismissed.

 

So I don’t know if to ask for a compromise agreement again now before the appeal or wait now until the appeal, and see what happens it’s too late in any case for my new job.

I am seeing my solicitor on Wednesday about organising a employment tribunal case and he may send a letter to my ex employer regarding the reference.

I am cross I had found a new job, ready to start in the new year, new start, etc etc but not only has my ex employer sanctioned me way too harshly they have also stopped future employment, I just don’t think this is fair based on the fact they were unable to prove any wrong doing!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again. I've unapproved a duplicate post that you did just now. It's a bit of a problem at the moment :).

 

It might be worth ringing ACAS again, because it does depend who you speak to these days. But if you see your lawyer, that could change things.

 

I wonder if it would have been different with the new job if you'd had the opportunity to show them the letter and explain a bit more?

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have rang ACAS again and spoke with them about this, their advice was to wait to hear back regarding the appeal before they get involved, so far enough thats what I shall do, this I guess will be after the holidays - but again to little to late for the new role! :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

 

just to add yet another twist, the new employer wants to see all my paperwork regarding the situation and dismissal etc from my ex employer, I have given them a higlevel summary of accounts but I do not want to go into full on detail it would take a long time! and plus I am of course defending myself against the evidence etc I dont think this is a good idea, I am going to ET and I think it could be used agaisnt me! I appriciate they want to make a judgement and see if they can continue but what is the point? I mean if they accept my version of events, and accept I am taking them (ex employer) to an ET for unfair dismissal, why can they not base thier decision to continue with employment on that, does that make sense/?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it wouldnt give too much away, may i ask what type of employment you are in?

 

I am sorry you have had this experience with both ACAS and agencies because I have had the exact opposite with both. You must remain positive and not give up.

 

IMHO, I wouldnt give the new employer too much information because I would rather they considered my application on my experience and even if they were to take you on a 3 month trial, there's nothing to say they would have to keep you on if they later found out that your ET may not have gone as expected. More positively, if they felt you were a good suitable applicant for the post and you were working well within the team/department for them, they might ignore the other ongoing actions, if that makes sense?

 

Your solicitor should be able to give you a better indication as to your chances with the ET. But in the meantime will you need to sign on at the local Job Centre? How will this case affect your entitlement to your benefits? Will it have an impact on any major finances - bring this to the attention of your solicitor - utilise them as much as possible.

 

Keep posting updates but stay strong.

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...