Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Benefits being stopped and massive bill


caro
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4079 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

the DP or Disability Premium was awarded to an I.S claimaint after fifty two weeks if they had IB, or as now straight away if DLA is awarded, this can be for low rate mob or low rate care or whatever rate is awarded.... If the customer gets Middle Rate Care or higher and live alone the they may be entitled to another premium on top SDP.. This is around £55

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the help. I think I need to spend more time looking at this to get my head round what Mandy's been getting. There certainly hasn't been a car.

 

I can't see anything at all relating to DLA, but from the look of the computer records she's had IB since 1995 and there's also mention of a disability premium. It was Severe Disablement Allowance which wasn't allowed.

 

I thought the DLA form was bad enough, but these records are a thousand times worse to try and understand.:-(

 

I can't understand why there's never been any mention of a learning disability either. I wonder if her family may have had old-fashioned attitudes towards this and tried to keep it quiet.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Severe Disablement Allowance

 

Severe Disablement Allowance (SDA) is a benefit for people who are unable to work as a result of a long term severe illness or disability and who have not paid sufficient National Insurance contributions to qualify for Incapacity Benefit.

From April 2001 the law changed so that no new claims for SDA could be made. However, periodic reassessment of people who are in receipt of SDA may take place.

Medical evidence

 

The medical requirement for entitlement to SDA is that the person must be incapable of work and at least 80 percent disabled. Non-medical decision makers make decisions about entitlement taking all the evidence into account.

At the time of reassessment, people may meet the threshold for benefit on the basis of paper evidence. If this is not possible, they must undergo a face to face assessment. This assessment is carried out by approved Atos Healthcare professionals, who are trained in disability assessment.

 

 

your friend could have beein iro of SDA credits only only wiith I.S paying the benefit. The D.P would have been paid to her from 1996 if she went onto benefits in 1995

If he have computer printouts of her benefit entitlements you will see SDA as type 16..

In other benefits screens. Ifs its not SDA and its IB thats type 61.

 

If she had been in receipt of DLA then you will see these mentioned as type 11 thats DLA MOB and type 44 thats DLA care

 

People who are on SDA now have protected rights

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Mikey. That helps explain a lot. I'll take a better look over the next couple of days and see if I can unravel it, but I don't think she's had SDA.

 

Do you know what a green card meant in the 80's?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Disabled Person’s Register for employment purposes existed until the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 came into force, when it ceased to operate. The register was run by the Employment Service (now the Department for Work and Pensions). It was open to anyone with a disability that would affect them getting or keeping a job. The registration certificate (or Green Card) was issued when someone joined the Register and lasted a number of years depending on the disability of the individual.

 

If someone had a green card then it was supposed to help them find employment..

Will ask IB for more details :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much Mikey. So hopefully that should show a level of disability, but it remains to be seen if it's enough for Mandy to qualify for DLA.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Nyst. I'm just trying to fit the pieces together to understand the bigger picture, so I feel I need to understand everything.

 

Mandy told me that she got the green card after a court case which proved she was disabled, so I thought it might be relevant.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Checked with an old IB bod, The Green Card was given to people who were on the Register to mainly help them get employment.. Before the act was changed companies had to by law employ so many disabled people so if someone had the green card in theory it should help them get a job. They were usually guaranteed an interview with one. There were disability advisors at each job centre who helped the customer to find work..

 

When you sent the SAR did you get records from CIS. Central compute, this will say if DLA was in payment as it holds all benefit interests, maybe not from the date of claim but if DLA was in pymnt it should show

Link to post
Share on other sites

That rings a bell now you say it.

 

I don't think DLA has been paid - or even applied for before. They say they are currently having difficulty in obtaining the Incapacity Benefit computer records, but are continuing their efforts and will issue it asap.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Mandy's had a few letters.

 

1. District Council have re-calculated council tax bills from 2007 and sent bills to the tune of about £5,500. There are separate calculations for each year and they want payment in February. I'm going to ask for an appointment for me and Mandy to get an explanation of how they've arrived at their figures so we can check they're right, and see if we can come up with some reasons for the amount to be reduced.

 

2. Jobcentre have written and said they've decided Mandy wasn't eligible for income support and now have to decide if she has to pay it back.

 

3. DLA application was received on 29th December. As it was due in on 23rd December I rang and they will still pay from 11th November if the claim is accepted because of the delay due to Christmas post.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you need help deciphering DWP abbreviations, give me a shout. I've seen more than my fair share of their SAR responses and as a result, am almost fluent in 'DWP speak'. I must admit though that lately, there appears to be a lot of things appearing on them that looks suspiciously like text speak, or made up abbreviations - I'm not sure which. They will also send you a list of their abbreviations if you request them - though they should have sent this with the SAR itself, they rarely do.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Erika. They did send a list of abbreviations but I checked a couple that weren't on there. Just people's own shorthand I think. I must admit with Christmas and other things I've had going on, I've not given this the time it needs, so need to knuckle down to working through it. I think I might scan a few pages and

 

Sorry if this has been answered before, but what are the criteria for council tax benefit? I've only had a few minutes to look at the new bills, but there is mention of a second person on low income so that seems to count for something. What happens if someone in the household is disabled? I'm sure my mum didn't pay CT because she was disabled, but she was much older and lived alone. Looking at directgov.co.uk, it looks like it's not that simple! http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/DisabledPeople/FinancialSupport/Taxreliefandreductions/DG_10026451

 

Also I don't know all the ins and outs of Mandy's parents circumstances, so I'm' hoping that the District Council may be able to clarify this.

 

I wonder if they'd provide the info they've used to make their calculations, which presumably should have info about Mandy's parents circumstances. Not sure ......

 

:|

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Council tax benefit can be 'passported' - when an individual receives an income related benefit, they automatically qualify for council tax benefit if they are a council tax payer. Alternatively, if a person does not receive income related benefits, the counil tax benefit will be assessed on what income and capital that person and their partner have. If their income and capital is low enough, they will get the benefit. If it is too high then they will not be eligible.

 

If someone receives CTB and there is another adult living their who is not their dependant, a 'non dependant deduction' will be applied - basically they reduce the council tax benefit because of the other adult in the home. How much depends on how much the non dependant earns and it can change once a year (in April).

 

Council tax benefit and a council tax reduction (also referred to as a discount) are not the same thing. Some people can also be exempt from paying council tax - again, this is not the same as a reduction or benefit. What would happen with a disabled person in regard to council tax, would very much depend upon their circumstances. There is no 'blanket' for all disabled people, as such - as you've discovered!

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it would seem her parents had over £16k, but Mandy was on a low income. If she has to repay the IS then she'll have been on NO income for all those years!!

 

I was wondering if Mandy could be held responsible for her parents debts since they'd died, but I guess it should have been settled out of the estate?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It should have been, yes. If the estate was distributed before the debts were settled, it's the executor who becomes liable. That is the only time where someone else can be pursued for debt of a deceased person. Unless of course, the executor put a notice in the London Gazette (or Edinburgh Gazette in Scotland) about the death and the creditors did not come forward within the time limit.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mandy tells me that she had the will and that she and her relative dealt with it.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Made some progress today.

 

1. The last of the computerised records regarding benefits arrived, which showed incapacity benefit was paid from 1994 to 1998, and income support from 2006 until it was stopped in November. There was a number to ring if there were any questions and I spoke to a very helpful lady who deals with Data Protection requests. I couldn't work out what, if anything was paid between 1998 and 2006 and she explained that some records would have been destroyed in line with the DPA when finished with.

 

I asked if there was any mention at any time of Mandy having learning disabilities. :-o She checked and rang me back to say no and gave me the name and address of someone I should advise of this with something from her doctor confirming this and how it affects her. I have got something from him already which might be sufficient, but could be worth contacting him to provide something more substantial. I recognised the name provided as the lady who conducted the IUC, and this was confirmed, and I was told this was significant additional information. Let's hope she's right! :-)

 

2. I had a good look at the info from the council about CT and how it's been calculated including benefits, but it wasn't at all clear so I rang and asked for an appointment to see someone with Mandy to better understand it. It seems no CT was paid at all for the period claimed so I want to understand why, and maybe find out if this was their mistake. Could be they just weren't told about Mandy's mums money, but we'll see.

 

3. I've printed off the form GL24 to appeal the decision that Mandy has been overpaid benefits, and typed a list of about 14 or 15 points for them to consider. I daresay some will be irrelevant but maybe some will work. :wink: I'll post them up over the weekend.

 

Meanwhile Mandy is worrying herself witless about this. :-(

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Nys. :-)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Done a lot of thinking about this but need to take some action now.

 

The appeal against the DWP decision that Mandy wasn't entitled to IS is a no-brainer. Will appeal that and I've got my head round that (I think).

 

One question on this though - how often is it reviewed or need to be re-applied for?

 

The Council Tax is not so straightforward.

 

I'm thinking that from the date Mandy's mum died there's no question that those bills should be paid - although I don't really understand why Mandy didn't get these earlier. Are the council under any obligation to make sure bills are sent out in good time? How come she didn't get a bill before - even if only to say nothing was owing due to benefits?

 

They have allowed 25% discount for the entire period in question because Mandy's mum was on pension credits. Now it seems to me that she shouldn't have been because of her money so I feel that this needs to be addressed with the council, otherwise it's like admitting that Mandy was the one in the wrong, when none of this was really down to her. IMO the pension credits are more questionable. Now if those had to be repaid, would it cost less than repaying the IS (if DWP decide money should be repaid)?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"one a lot of thinking about this but need to take some action now.

 

The appeal against the DWP decision that Mandy wasn't entitled to IS is a no-brainer. Will appeal that and I've got my head round that (I think).

 

One question on this though - how often is it reviewed or need to be re-applied for?""

 

 

we set a case control in our Dialogue 92 to send out a review form A2 every couple of years but this is not always adhered to.

GMS matches might throw up a match and the claim may be reviewed through this, like wise compliance may do a routine check,

but if a customer has a condition to I.S and

its continuos then I.S doesnt have to be applied for again and the claim can run for years

and mabe not looked at, unless of course there is a COC change of circumstances.

 

then of course its up to that customer to notify the COC.

then we review the case

 

I have seen cases on from the 90s, with their notepad clean, heart sinks when I find them, but usually they are ok

still entitiled and everything is fine as far as we are aware

 

 

And looking at it from this angle, a joint bank account with 28k, would she not be entitled to half of this untill her mother died 14k, then she would have been entitled to benefits with a 16k limit an op yes but still some entitlement maybe :)

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites

Good point about the joint account Mike. Thanks.

 

Also for the info on IS. I'm really surprised it can run for years, but I guess it cuts back on admin costs.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...