Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Disciplinary hearing decision and sick leave - does it suspend the appeal?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4561 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Why did the external stakeholder 'turn' on you? And "frenchness didn't do me any favours" , how?

 

Many on here take employers to the ET with no more knowledge than you at present and the sure knowledge that they have been shafted. As long as you have a genuine grievance people on here will help. I do understand your position in trying to maximise earnings to enable you time and space to find a way out, but as you realise we like genuine cases and sometimes can be quite pointed when people admit to wrong doing and don't want to take the punishment.

 

I sense frustration at the employer (and there clients) and a stitch up. I also sense that your salary is more substantial than most on here. The principles are quite simple though whether low paid or a high flyer.

 

Your personal situation complicates things though as fighting legal battles on both fronts has to be difficult... I know I have been there (several times)!

 

Are you saying you don't want to issue proceedings when you are dismissed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

@ papa

 

i am no banker or fat cat expat, sadly! I am unlikely to issue proceedings once dismissed, on the basis that i will have to progress other options in my life. I wish I had very strong evidences to bring to tribunal and therefore be in a position to compromise with my employer. However they have followed the process by the letter, and to that respect, they cannot be summoned to court.

 

So, yes, it is completely a stitch up, and indeed this leaves with me with a sour taste.

 

Re, other points made by yourself and conciliator, yes - my case is genuine, and my intentions were primarly to extend my employment. However this follows suggestions from other legal personnel and I was to have some other opinions. Not here to bend the rules and wasting your time and energy is definitely not my intention. I am in need of help, I have questions in mind, I want to ensure I do follow law, and to these respects, I have contacted people on this forum to further understand my case and the outcomes to follow

 

again, thank you all for your kind contributions

Link to post
Share on other sites

“Not here to do wrong, but to restore a bit of justice/fairness into my case by abiding to employment law (that line is for you conciliator).”

There are those on here who like nothing better than quoting employment law. There are also those who can quote with the deftness of Supreme Judges from cases that have already been through the tribunals and courts, some may have been similar to your own, from which guidance could have been sought.

They could have provided solutions to your particular issues if asked, but that was not what was asked for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello

 

me again... Out of curiosity, why would an employer really insist on having employment to terminate on a Friday? And how would they manage the handover, if any?

 

Lastly, are they in their rights to pay my notice within 45 days??? I found this really excessive in my compromise agreement!

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello

 

me again... Out of curiosity, why would an employer really insist on having employment to terminate on a Friday? And how would they manage the handover, if any?

 

Lastly, are they in their rights to pay my notice within 45 days??? I found this really excessive in my compromise agreement!

 

cheers

 

Your very first posting:

 

“my company is to issue their disciplinary hearing decision in writting while i am not there (monday). The decision is very likely dismissal. I will have 5 days to appeal.”

....................................

“This is for Monday 31st Oct, so fairly urgent! many thks”

 

Out of curiosity, how can you foretell what termination day your employer is going to insist on and what the notice or notice payment arrangements are going to be two days before the letter advising you of their decision is to be issued to you?

 

Not to mention the fact, according to your own post, that you have five days to appeal, which could delay your dismissal for even more time, and that your own preferred option would be to pursue this matter legitimately, deception being futile.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@ all

 

my company has issued their decision. Awaiting the letter. Still off sick.

 

Will write once i receive the letter (today or tomorrow). And ask for the appeal to start from reception of the letter. I am not working and I am not meant receiving emails etc. I have advised my employer of my illness and incapacity to work.

 

I think I will appeal. They havent even given me a blame. They dismissed me straight away.

 

Such a stitch up. I am fuming! Even though i knew this was to happen.

 

Anyways- anything else i should know / consider? Am I doing the right things, re: appeal, 5 working days etc?

 

tks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...