Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yup, well so far they have lied to me about responding to a CCA,  are threatening me with a default notice that they don't have, produced a knocked up version of my NOA, sent me 29 pages of spew for an agreement. No wonder they pay 5 p in the pound for that crap.
    • Paragraph 2. I think there should be further down and also you should make the point that the payment to was made unilaterally and without the imposition of any conditions. Paragraph 3 – this is unnecessary because you are not claiming as an entitled third-party. This worries me because it makes me feel that you haven't fully read around because this is a paragraph which you would include where you were suing EVRi as a beneficial third party because you had actually made your contract with Packlink or some other broker. I think you need to revisit and do some more reading. I'm afraid I have a sense that you have simply copied this from somebody else's witness statement without understanding that it wasn't necessary. Please can you post the amended draft. Other than the suggestions above, it looks okay – but let's see it again for a further appraisal. In terms of the evidence, parties bundle, I think it might be an idea to start off with the correspondence with EVRi and then go onto the other evidence. You will have to amend the index page accordingly. You could shorten this bit. Take 19 is pretty well blank and you may as well miss it out also, there seems to be some repetition of emails and the email chain. I think will be worth going through and getting rid of duplicates if you can. 49 pages is a bit long and it would be a good idea to try and reduce the number. I have a feeling that 50 pages as the County Court limit anyway. The judge will be happier with you if the bundle is smaller. Maybe you could reduce the size of some of the images or messages et cetera. You have got several messages which straddle onto a second page so that things like sign off information and standard confidentiality information become orphans. A bit of manipulation and they could be joined to their parents I think. Page 31 as an example. So is page 19. You may only be up to shorten the whole thing by 56 pages – but I think it would be a good idea. 56 pages is, after all, 10%. If you can do more then so much the better
    • Investment by Dutch brewing giant will create 1,000 new jobs and reopen dozens of closed pubsView the full article
    • Qantas agrees to pay millions to settle lawsuit accusing it of selling tickets to cancelled flights.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Huppelkutje's mum and Ashbourne Management Services Ltd


huppelkutje
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4564 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys. I came back to the UK to visit my mum and found out that she is being harrassed by AMM. I just happened to see the latest letter from them that had arrived and after enquiring about it she showed me the file FULL of letters that she's received from them since cancelling her gym membership in May. She cancelled after about 6 weeks of joining up when she found out that the program she'd received at the gym had been the cause of her bad back! After doing the exercises as she was told for a few weeks and experiencing back pain, she asked a different trainer how to do them and was told she'd been given the wrong instructions. (Surely a breach of contract, with standards below an acceptable level?) She saw a doctor and was referred to a physio who advised her that she shouldn't continue at the gym as the exercises that she had been given were completely inappropriate for her. The gym said she could cancel with a month's notice but that she'd have to put it in writing. She'd already paid £25 in advance by card and one monthly direct debit (£12) had gone out. She sent a letter stating her reasons for leaving and cancelled the direct debit...

 

Ashbourne wrote to her asking for £22 to cover her arrears and their admin charge. The next day they sent another asking for a letter from the doctor and the payment of money owed to them. She sent a doctor's note and disputed owing any money as she had paid in advance. They then sent more letters asking for £22 to cover her arrears and their admin charge. Somehow they didn't receive the doctor's note, although they admitted receiving the covering letter that accompanied it! She sent another copy of the doctor's letter. They don't respond to any of her letters and just demand increasing amounts of money (the latest figure is £147, as they claim the balance of the minimum term is now due, less an early payment discount!). She is also receiving recorded voice calls from them up to twice a day, 7 days a week between 9am and 7-8pm.

 

The original contract was for a minimum term of 36 months, and it is a standard contract as found on the OFT findings page; Contract 12. As far as I can gather although people who signed Contract 12 are legally bound to pay for 12 months, although this is negated by the fact that her doctor advised her to stop and wrote a letter confirming this. Also, in my mind, the gym were in breach of contract by employing inexperienced staff as trainers. She is still taking prescription painkillers for the back pain.

 

I'm unsure how to proceed from here. Should I write a letter to AMM, reminding them of the court ruling? Report them to the OFT? Just ignore the idiots?! The phone calls and letter are really stressing my mum out.

 

Sorry for the long-winded post!

:whoo:Officially debt free October 2011 after 10 years 11 months :whoo:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Huppelkutje,

 

I've moved your post into your own thread which you can use.

 

A 36 month contract is not enforceable at all and there is no need to pay for the first 12 months.

 

YM should write to AMSL using Recorded Delivery as follows :-

 

Dear sir or madam,

 

36 Month membership at xxxxxxx gym, Town

 

I have taken advice because of the number of demands I have been getting from Ashbourne after I cancelled my Membership with xxxxx gym on xxxdate.

 

After the High Court ruling against AMSL earlier this year, it is clear that you should not be pursuing payment for a 36 month contract.

 

I require your confirmation within 7 days that you will stop seeking any payments from me, whether by phone or in writing with immediate effect.

 

Although you claimed to have not received my doctor's letter (sent twice), this is clearly irrelevant as the High Court has effectively barred you from making any further demands of me.

 

If you fail to confirm, in writing within 7 days, that you will cease making demands of me, I will report this matter to the OFT without further warning.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

:-)

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Slick!! I wondered where my post had gone, really thought I was going mad for a minute or two, ha ha :) Thank you so, so much for the template, I'm going to type it up now & send it Signed For tomorrow morning :-)

:whoo:Officially debt free October 2011 after 10 years 11 months :whoo:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great !!

 

Let us know how they respond.

 

If necessary, we can put you in direct contact with an OFT senior who may want further info from you as part of their ongoing action against AMSL.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would be fine, those creeps have made my blood boil and if I can do anything to help the OFT then I will!!! I will keep you posted. I have just re-read Q&A #7 on the OFT website; I thought it meant that someone who had signed a standard Number 12 contract of 36 months could only be made to pay for the first 12 months. Is it actually the case that all of the number 11-13 contracts with a minimum term of 12 months or over can be terminated at any time?

 

Ashbourne have just sent a text to my mum's mobile, reminding her that her payments are overdue....grrrrrr 10.50pm on a Friday night! :mad2:

Edited by huppelkutje

:whoo:Officially debt free October 2011 after 10 years 11 months :whoo:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Huppelkutje,

 

Please keep that text message in case the OFT want to see how AMSL are prepared to send a text msg at that time of the night demanding payment !!

 

My understanding is that Contract #12 is unfair if it is for over 12 months, unless it allows for cancellation with a months notice and a modest sum for cancellation compensation.

 

From the OFT site:-

 

The Court held:

 

various terms of Ashbourne's standard form agreements are unfair contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. In particular:

 

- Terms in contracts 11 to 13 which tie consumers in for more than 12 months. The judge indicated that if there is a longer period it would be unfair unless the consumer could give 30 days notice to cancel, and pay a modest sum in compensation. The court was willing to accept a 12 month minimum period in contracts 11 to 13 because they contain more circumstances in which the consumer can suspend or terminate their membership for stated reasons.

 

Update us when you get a reply.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

No reply as yet, and the Royal Mail site still shows my letter as "being progressed through our network for delivery". However, there have been no telephone calls or texts, and only 1 standard letter requesting payment which would have been sent before they received my letter (IF they have received it!). Maybe the tracking status just hasn't been updated... I'm keeping my fingers crossed!! :)

:whoo:Officially debt free October 2011 after 10 years 11 months :whoo:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...