Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon,    I am writing in reference to the retail dispute number ****, between myself and Newton Autos concerning the sale of a Toyota Avensis which has been found to have serious mechanical faults.    As explained previously the car was found to be faulty just six days after purchase. The car had numerous fault codes that appeared on the dash board and went into limp mode. This required assistance from the AA and this evidence has already been provided. The car continues to exhibit these faults and has been diagnosed as having faults with the fuel injectors which will require major mechanical investigation and repairs.    Newton Autos did not make me aware of any faults upon purchase of the vehicle and sold it as being in good condition.    Newton Autos have also refused to honour their responsibilities under The Consumer Rights Act 2015 which requires them to refund the customer if the goods are found to be faulty and not fit for purpose within 30 days of purchase.    Newton Autos also refused to accept my rejection of the vehicle and refused to refund the car and accept the return of the vehicle.    It is clear to me that the car is not fit for purpose as these mechanical faults occurred so soon after purchase and have been shown to be present by both the AA and an independent mechanic.   Kind regards
    • Commercial Landlords are legally allowed to sue for early cancellation of the lease. You can only surrender your lease if your landlord agrees to your doing so. They are under no obligation even to consider your request and are entitled to refuse. You cannot use this as an excuse not to pay your rent. Your landlord is most likely to agree to your surrendering the lease if they want the property back in order to redevelop it, or if they wants to rent it to what they regards as a better tenant or at a higher rent. There are two types of surrender: Express surrender in writing. This is a written document which sets out the terms of the surrender. Implied surrender by conduct. (applies to your position) You can move out of the property you leased, simply hand your keys back and the lease will come to an end, but only if the landlord agrees to accept your surrender. Many tenants have thought they can simply post the keys through the landlord's letter box and the lease is ended. This is not true and without a document from the landlord, not only do you not know if the landlord has accepted the surrender, you also do not know on what basis they have accepted and could find they sue you for rent arrears, service charge arrears, damage to the property and compensation for your attempt to leave the property without the landlord's agreement. Unless you are absolutely certain that the landlord is agreeable to your departure, you should not attempt to imply a surrender by relying on your and the landlord's conduct.  
    • I had to deal with these last year worst DCA I have ever dealt with. Just wait for the constant threats of CCJ and how you'll lose in court and how they won't do mediation and they want the judge to question you with a load of "BIG" words to boot with the letter. My case was struck out in the end, stupidity on their part as I admitted to owing the debt in the end going through the court process was just a formality as they wouldn't let it drop despite me admitting the debt regardless. They didn't send the last part of the court paper work in so it ended up being struck out     .
    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

2nd phase reply received


Dammam
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1886 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear Mr Smith

Re: Account Charges for Overdraft Excesses and Returned Items

 

Thank you for taking the time to contact us about your account.

 

Your concern

 

I think it would be helpful if I set out my understanding of your concern:

 

· You feel that the charges you have incurred as contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulation 1999.

 

You are unhappy with that amount of charges you have incurred as a result of being overdrawn and from returned items.

You have requested that all charges incurred should be refunded for the past 6 years.

 

What's happened?

 

When you become a customer, we give you details of any charges for the day to day running of your account. Details of our charges are also available from our branch staff, telephone helpline or available on our website. While banking with us can be completely free, we only apply charges if a customer does not have enough money in their account to meet payments they have requested us to make.

 

Why has this happened?

 

You incurred charges because you did not ensure funds were available in your account to cover the payments set up by you. It is your responsibility to operate your account within any agreed limits. If your expenditure exceeds your income, you need to consider cancelling or reducing your monthly commitments.

 

As a business we are entitled to set charges to cover additional work, as is any other business. These charges are not hidden and are notified in the guide to banking charges leaflet we produce. We do not hide these charges and advise our customers to ensure cleared funds are available in their accounts to meet payments due. You will also note that in the front of each cheque book we request that funds are available before cheques are issued.

 

You accepted these terms when you opened your account and when you agreed your overdraft. We did not agree to pay your account in excess of the amount agreed without charges being made.

 

I must advise that we will expect your account to be run in line with the terms and conditions of its operation. This means that you must ensure that cleared funds are deposited into the account the working day before any payments are due. If you do not feel you will be able to run your account in accordance with the terms and condition, we may have to consider withdrawing certain facilities, such as any debit cards, overdrafts and chequebooks. Alternatively, you may wish to consider alternative banking arrangements.

 

Regarding your request for details of charges on your account for the past six years, I can advise that I am prepared to accept your request under the Data Protection Act. However I should point out that there is normally a £10 fee for information requested under Data Protection, although I am prepared to waive this on this occasion. In addition, I can also advise that some statement records we hold are on microfiche and, as such, fall outside the requirements of the Data Protection Act. Although this is the case, I can advise you that I have asked for copy statements to be produced for the period in question, which will highlight the charges you have referred to and I will send these to you within the next three weeks, which I trust will be acceptable. Our usual charge of £5.00 per copy statement has been waived on this occasion.

 

As a final point I regret that I am unable to advise you how our charges are calculated. We do review our charging structure on a regular basis and any changes are communicated to our customers in line with the Banking Code.

 

What happens next?

 

I hope that you feel I have made a fair decision on your complaint, but if you wish to talk about any of this, please call me on 0121 600 3243, or write to me at the above address.

 

You can ask the Financial Ombudsman Service to independently review my decision. You can contact them at The Financial Ombudsman Service, South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London, E14 9SR. Telephone: 0845 080 1800. Website: http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk. If you do want them to look at your complaint, they need you to get in touch with them within 6 months of the date of this letter.

 

Thank you once again for taking the time to raise your concerns with us.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

David Just

Assistant Manager

 

 

 

 

 

Bog standard reply that everyone is getting, except for this bit:-

 

"As a final point I regret that I am unable to advise you how our charges are calculated. We do review our charging structure on a regular basis and any changes are communicated to our customers in line with the Banking Code."

 

This was in answer to the question I posed elsewhere here and in my letter, namely why are we not seeing a reduction in charges considering the reduction in operating costs achieved by outsourcing much of the customer services functions to the sub-continent. And of course, how are the figures for these penalties arrived at.

Shouldn't things like this be a little more transparent? If it DOES cost £10+ for Lloyds to send a letter, then they can subcontract that part of the business to me and I'll do it for a fiver!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm being a bit of a gobshite today, so I sent this reply to the above letter to pass a bit of time.

 

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 

Dear Mr Just,

 

Thank you very much for your prompt reply. However, I need to clarify a few points which may not have been immediately apparent in my first email.

 

1. I have NOT at this stage requested repayment of charges over the last 6 years, but I HAVE requested repayment of charges Since July 1st 2002, a little over 3 and a half years. I did however request data going back 6 years if my request was not acted upon, which I assume is the case. Thank you very much for the waiving of the fees for these items.

 

2. "Why has this happened?" - I fully appreciate you point of view on this matter, and accept the premise of a charge which covers the cost of work

involved in certain processes above & beyond the boundaries of normal day to day banking. However, my argument is that the charges are not cost covering but punative in nature and thus in breach of the Office of Fair Trading findings which I mentioned in my first email.

 

3. My other concern is that following LloydsTSBs move into outsourcing customer services to the sub-continent, these punitive charges have remained artificially high. Given that the sole reason for industries to move parts of their operation to these countries is cost cutting, should the benefits not be passed on to the customers? After all, it is we that have to put up with the kind of sub-standard service that these changes appear to have brought (my one experience of your Indian call centre led me to complain about the unprofessional standard of the staff there, for which I received a standard response).

 

Finally, I have to say that I have always found Lloyds staff to be polite, helpful and efficient and the one time I needed to speak to the manager at the Brecon Branch several years ago on a matter that was neither my or, as it transpired, the banks fault, I found the service excellent. I wouldn't wish my request to be in any way construed as a complaint against the day to day work of the staff at my branch.

 

Once again, I thank you for your response which is appreciated even though I don't feel it addresses my request or concerns. I must advise you that I will now be starting procedings to recover the disputed sum of money through the County Court system. I am fortunate that my local newspaper has indicated a willingness to support my case so any fears I had of possibly losing my own small costs for the case have now been alleviated.

 

 

 

Got this reply in under an hour:-

 

 

Thanks for your e-mail.

 

I have passed this on to David Just as requested.

 

Regards

 

Keith Boden

Lloyds TSB

Service Recovery

Birmingham

 

 

I've tried to come over as non-agressive and it's true that I've always found my Branch Staff to be excellent, so credit where it's due and a little flattery gets you everywhere, so they say :-)

 

Just out of interest, what does the job 'Service Recovery' entail?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got this this afternoon:-

 

Our Ref : xxxxxxxx

 

Dear Mr Smith

 

Thank you for your E-mail dated

I recognise that you had not asked for a refund over a six-year period and I accept that my previous response should have reflected this.

 

Regarding your other comments I regret that I am unable to add any further information to my previous response, although I respect your opinion on the matter. I can assure you that we do welcome feedback and your comments have been noted.

 

As a final point, I can also assure you that we recognise your complaint is not about staff members at your local branch and your comments about the service you have received there are welcome.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

 

David Just

Assistant Manager

 

 

Ah well, at least he still respects me :-)

But seriously, the staff have always been very good - just that they're having to follow a terrible set of rules.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just go to Moneyclaim and issue the Good News. :twisted:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just go to Moneyclaim and issue the Good News. :twisted:

 

I can't yet, as I presume they are now sending me 6 years of charges - I want to check those out first before claiming as I gave them the chance to settle immediately for 3.5 years or to fight their case and defend 6 years of charges. It'll be interesting to see how much extra they're willing to risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

My wife just called me at work, have apparently been offered a settlement - however, not sure how much I can tell you right now as I don't know if it includes any shutup clauses or anything. They have asked me to attend a banking review and change my "3 way" cards for "2 way" ones, whatever that means.

 

 

 

Thanks all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/05/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support their.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1886 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...