Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Child tax credit, don't think it's entirely my fault


melandra_x
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4609 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I became redundant Nov 2009 and I informed tax credit, I trained and became a registered child minder in April 2010 again I told tax credits, at no point did I tell them that I required child tax credits, however they started paying me £105 per week. I received my tax credit summary and like most years I did not look at it. I had no idea that I was receiving this payment at all, I received a letter from the tax credits just doing a spot check asking me for details of my childcare provider, if you knew me you would understand what am I like. Also one of parents of the children I was caring for told me her voucher payment to me didn't go through to me, me being me didn't even notice, she asked me to check bank statement and that's when I noticed the amount being paid to me!! I rang the tax credit office and told them that I didn't ask for childcare benefit. I rang again and they said that a decision will be made in due course. I followed it up with a letter as the payments were still coming. I think they've stopped as I checked my balance of my account and it was a lot less than I thought I had. I am about to receive a letter stating that I have had a year of tax credits which I was not entitled to and I will have to pay it back, I told them to check back at the recording of my conversation and they will see that I never asked for child tax credit. Paying back this money will be highly impossible as I have not got any savings what so ever and to top that I have lost one of the children I was caring for and have just one child now! Do you think I will have to pay back the full amount??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not an expert on tax credits, just someone who receives them myself, but yes as a layperson I would expect you would have to pay them back. It clearly states that it is the responsibility of the claimant to check all info is correct on the award claim and that you will incur an overpayment if info is incorrect. I scrutinise mine with a magnifying glass! On another note I cant understand how you ended up getting childcare tax credit without providing an EY number and address of a registered minder (I am a registered minder myself so know how that bit works!)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for responding.

I previously used a registered child minder, tax credits people assumed I was using them again when I started back at work, however they should not have had this assumption! When you renew by phone or advise of change of circumstances, surely the questions should be asked. Paying back a year's child tax credit will financially finish me! I rang them and told them that I believe that I was getting too much money and they confirmed that they have this conversation on record, I was told it was correct without them asking me my circumstances. I think this is their fault, I notified them before they contacted me! :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Melandra, wow that sounds tricky! I assume then that they have continued paying you childcare tax credit since you were made redundant if they are still using yr old minders details? If they have yr conversation on record I guess it will prove you didnt initially request childcare when you became self employed as a minder but I fear they will still say you are liable to repay as it will have been stated on your revised award notice - which you will have received when you advised of change of circs - that you had been awarded childcare tax credit? As I said I know for sure that it is the responsibility of the claimant to check their award notice and this is clearly stated on all docs, however I also know from my clients' experiences that it is too easy to be landed with an overpayment of childcare tax credit as the systems dont appear to be set up to flag potential genuine errors on the part of the claimant. As I say to all my clients check, check and check again when any award notice comes through! I am no expert though so hopefully someone will come along who has more insight from a professional perspective. Good luck x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...