Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Social Housing law question


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4687 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello!

 

Mother, stepfather and brothers live in a 3 floor council house, an old building.

 

Heating for the entire property is basically, 1 small gas fire in the living room.

 

Someone suggested that its actually against the law for a council/housing assoc property to not have central heating, is this true?

 

The mother is on ESA, and the house has serious damp problems, which still have not yet been fixed.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone suggested that its actually against the law for a council/housing assoc property to not have central heating, is this true?

 

We have been in "social housing" for more than 30 years and follow this sort of thing fairly closely, the rights and duties of the tenants and the council or housing association but this is the first that I have heard of that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try the environmental health people if the house is damp but whats to stop your Family actually putting their hands in their pockets and buy more gas fires or portable electric fires and I dont know about it being against the law for housing association/council houses NOT to have central heating but I hope not after all 1000s of private renters home owners do not have CH I didnt have CH until I bought my last place and would really have liked the tax payer to fork out for it but no chance of that

 

Sorry but this is another post showing peoples sense of entitlement and inability to take some responsibility for their own environment.

 

If yiour family dont like where they are living then they can rent through the private sector and choose a property with CH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Short answer is no. Longer answer is that the Decent Homes Standard (which is a minimum standard that all HAs and LAs are expected to adhere to) requires a good degree of "thermal comfort" in the property. This standard is not enforced for breaches in it (it is more of a general target, than specifically on a tenant by tenant requirement), and obviously "thermal comfort" does not in and of itself require GCH.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try the environmental health people if the house is damp but whats to stop your Family actually putting their hands in their pockets and buy more gas fires or portable electric fires and I dont know about it being against the law for housing association/council houses NOT to have central heating but I hope not after all 1000s of private renters home owners do not have CH I didnt have CH until I bought my last place and would really have liked the tax payer to fork out for it but no chance of that

 

Sorry but this is another post showing peoples sense of entitlement and inability to take some responsibility for their own environment.

 

If yiour family dont like where they are living then they can rent through the private sector and choose a property with CH

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

There is absolutely nothing suggesting a sense of entitlement in my post, thank you very much, maybe you should learn to become more literate, at least past an "spot chased the ball" level, if you do so, then you are welcome to return and explain where this sense of entitlement appears.

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Edited by caledfwlch

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Short answer is no. Longer answer is that the Decent Homes Standard (which is a minimum standard that all HAs and LAs are expected to adhere to) requires a good degree of "thermal comfort" in the property. This standard is not enforced for breaches in it (it is more of a general target, than specifically on a tenant by tenant requirement), and obviously "thermal comfort" does not in and of itself require GCH.

 

Thankyou, just what I thought, the Shelter advisor was getting confused, unless the Welsh Senate is bringing something in.

 

She needs to focus on the damp issues at the moment anyway.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you brought the damp issues up via the formal complaints process? Could you name the HA please? (simply as I cannot advise anything that directly involves my employer). And - you are welcome.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you brought the damp issues up via the formal complaints process? Could you name the HA please? (simply as I cannot advise anything that directly involves my employer). And - you are welcome.

 

Tai Ceredigion is the HA.

 

They have been informed, many, many times. The Shelter advisor is now on the case, and is writing to them giving them a week or two, or Environmental Health will be involved. I believe the many, many phonecalls and meetings held regarding the damp is fair warning, and that Environmental Health should be contacted first.

 

It is serious enough, that a private Landlord would be prosecuted without a doubt, don't know what would happen with a HA though.

 

The walls in the kichen and hall are collapsing and cracking due to the damp, the walls are near black, the kitchen units are soggy, and wont remain clean, the sink unit has become completely detached from the wall. The double glazing windows which were fitted in the kitchen and leak are probably not helping either. Its not the best environment for the mother with her respiratory illnesses like COPD and my brothers Asthma.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Outrageous. Easy throw away comment for me to make, but I would be shocked if that happened in my HA. I would suggest escalating this to the TSA/Housing Ombudsman: http://www.tenantservicesauthority.org/server/show/ConWebDoc.16267

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Outrageous. Easy throw away comment for me to make, but I would be shocked if that happened in my HA. I would suggest escalating this to the TSA/Housing Ombudsman: http://www.tenantservicesauthority.org/server/show/ConWebDoc.16267

 

I have been telling her, and telling her to go right to the top on this, its beyond a joke. The HA has already been embarressed recently by some of its shortcomings, and unless they are poked with sharp pointy sticks they wont do anything.

 

I do not believe the Shelter advisor's letter will make any difference, only a phonecall from Environmental Health will make them jump. I believe that the damage is so severe, that it will take so long to fix, that they are going to have to be put up somewhere else, and have their meals paid for whilst repairs are made!

 

But then, thats my mum, how dare she feel a sense of entitlement in wanting a house thats not extremely dangerous and toxic to her health....

 

I think, if a judge were shown pictures of the kitchen, a HA officer could well find himself facing prosecution.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

MPs tend to be interested in this level of disrepair from a HA/LA as well by the way...

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

this is shocking and i would make sure you have photographic evidence of all the problems

 

Personally i wouldnt wait to get Enviromental Health involved i would be contacting them myself and requesting that they come out and inspect the property and you are given a copy of there findings.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

There is absolutely nothing suggesting a sense of entitlement in my post, thank you very much, maybe you should learn to become more literate, at least past an "spot chased the ball" level, if you do so, then you are welcome to return and explain where this sense of entitlement appears.

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Secondly you do have a sense of entitlement , you seem to expect there should be laws to give you the central heating just because you are in social housing when people who rent through the private sector have no legal right to central heating and people who buy often cant afford to install it.

 

However you have given more information about the problems in other posts and I would agree with others that the situation is deplorable, however the question still remains that if I gas fire is not enough to heat the house why your family have not bought electric fires or some other means of heating the house.

 

 

 

I take it you have approached

Link to post
Share on other sites

Secondly you do have a sense of entitlement , you seem to expect there should be laws to give you the central heating just because you are in social housing when people who rent through the private sector have no legal right to central heating and people who buy often cant afford to install it.

 

:roll:

 

Ceredigion Housing Association is a private sector company.

 

The County Council's housing stock was privatised in 2009.

 

Central heating provided by the Association would have to be funded by a private loan, not by the government and guess what: This was already supposed to have happened.

 

I therefore surmise that caledfwlch is looking for a way to force them to stick to their promise, a pathetically naive ambition if I may be so bold as to say so.

 

:horn:

 

P.S.

 

Tenants vote to divorce themselves from the councils, because a good deal of time and money is spent to convince them that these sort of benefits are not available from the public sector, not because the public sector is perceived to be a soft touch.

Edited by perplexity
PS
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...