Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Any advice on how to appeal? Car towed in 6 minutes for alleged contravention I dont think occured


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4692 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I was referred here by a user who was helped by users on this forum and filed a successful appeal. Here is my story.

 

I went to the doctors surgery, parked up outside (no lines, no signs, no nothing). When I came out (9 minutes later - I have a letter from the doctors to prove it) my car was gone. I thought it had been stolen, rung up the other half, while on the phone, a passer by described my car and said it had been towed.

 

I started speaking to the passer by and it turns out people get towed from that spot all the time as they claim there is a dropped curb there. The curb is not clear that it is a drop, it doesnt go down flush to the floor and there is no white line across it which is the case with other dropped curbs. There is no entrance near it. I did not see it. During this time I spoke to another 3 passers by who had all had their car towed from the area. This is proof it is not clear you are not meant to park there.... a money making scheme? I think so!

 

I called TRACE and they told me where my car was. I tried to speak to the pound and get my car back without having to pay given that I dont think the dropped curb was clear AND the fact they took my car in 6 minutes (they told me this) but alas the pound (run by a private company) and the council both claimed it was the others responsibility. The council even claimed there was no phone in the parking enforcement office!

 

I want to appeal this for two reasons:

 

1. I dont think it is clear that the curb is a dropped curb and therefore think it is unfair I was issued with a ticket (if I knew it was a dropped curb I wouldnt have parked there!)

2. Taking my car in 6 minutes seems massively unreasonable.

 

I was charged £265 for this by the way! I think they stole my car and then charged me for stealing it! Nice huh? Any help would be gratefully received! That £265 went on the credit card, and I really dont know how I'm going to pay it off!!

 

Thanks

 

purplesuzie :)

Edited by purplesuzie
typos
Link to post
Share on other sites

First off, get on to your credit card firm and inform them it was a payment that was made under duress, and you wish to do a chargeback. Do this ASAP, if your credit card firm is open 24/7, do it literally right now. If not, as soon as they open.

 

You can appeal to the firm that towed your car, but I can pretty much tell you for a fact you'll be told to go whistle.

 

If its a public road, then like it or not the council DO have at least some, if not all responsiblity. Thats exactly why you pay road/council tax etc.

 

You didnt specify if there was any signage or anything to inform you of the penalties of parking, am I to assume there wasnt any?

 

But like I said, youre best bet is to get a chargeback done on your card, pronto.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the street view spot is of when the buildings were beeing built so you can see it. I have a photo though, so I could post that? And no there were no signs or lines.

 

This happened on 28th June and I went on holiday, and have gotten back now so can I still call the credit card company?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have attached pictures of the dropped curb.... it doesnt go flush to the floor and I didnt notice it. There is a similar dropped part further up the road which is just a mistake but looks similar.

 

There is an opposite dropped curb....

 

I also attached a picture of other dropped curbs in the area and they are clear.

 

My issue however is also the way in which it was towed. Dont they have to wait half an hour to tow?

How_a_dropped_curb_should_look.jpg

Dropped_curb_I_allegedly_parked_on_Not_flush_to_the_road.jpg

Opposite_dropped_curb_which_is_flush_with_the_road.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not sure tbh. The credit card firm may indeed question the timescale, and I think there is a timelimit on doing a charge back, maybe it needs to be put in motion before the payment clears.Im not a finance expert by any means, so I would suggest you contact them and ask, and also get advice from the CAB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not sure tbh. The credit card firm may indeed question the timescale, and I think there is a timelimit on doing a charge back,.

 

Its usually 90 days, but legally you can do a chargeback within 6 years.

Professional property investor and conveyancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

purplesuzie

 

If your chargeback is not successful, the way I see this is you have to appeal against the towing, and if that appeal is rejected then appeal to NPAS

 

If the council wont let you appeal because you have already paid the fine (towing) then you will have to recover the money in the small claims track.

Professional property investor and conveyancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

The (primary) purpose of a dropped kerb is to allow easy access from the pavement to the road for wheelchairs and pushchairs. I fail to see how the council could claim this is an official dropped kerb access point when there is a rainwater drain directly in front of the dropped kerb!

Edited by crem
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks your comments have been helpful. I was parked over this dropped curb, but as I said, I dont think its clear. I think I will claim based on the fact they took the car in 6 minutes which seems unreasonable.

 

Does anyone know if you can tick more than one box on why you think you have grounds to appeal?

 

I found this statement: If the ticket was issued because either there was no pay-and-display ticket displayed, or an expired pay-and-display ticket, the council must wait 30 minutes after serving the Penalty Charge Notice before clamping or towing you away. This is reduced to 15 minutes for anyone with three or more outstanding parking tickets.

 

I wonder whether that is only when tickets should be displayed or towing in general? Does anyone know? If it is towing in general, then I think I definitely have a case as they didnt wait 30 minutes.

 

Thanks.

 

purplesuzie

Link to post
Share on other sites

The actual level of the dropped kerb in respect to the level of the road is uneven. I do agree looking at the picture it does not look clear. However it looks like its marked by a double width kerb stone, this maybe their arguing point!

 

As for the tow away, others may correct me if I am wrong but as the vehicle is causing an obstruction, I believe they can tow as soon as they place the PCN on it.

 

As far as the £265 is concerned I assume this included the PCN and the tow? The card issuer would tell you to appeal, I don't think you would stand an earthly with a charge back.

 

Others may advise otherwise but it seems your only appeal would be that the dropped kerb was not clear, but the double kerb stone and the kerb opposite, may make it unlikely to be accepted!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with the above. The state of the dropped kerb seems a more reasonable line of appeal than the 6 minutes, which I expect would fail. They can tow after 6 minutes if they see fit. However the visibility of the kerb is more a matter of judgement, and just might offer a slim chance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks .esmerobbo...

 

Does anyone know if there is a way of accessing records about how many people have been ticketed/towed from a certain spot. The reason being that I know a lot of people have been towed from there and all of them also missed that it was a dropped curb, so I think that could be my arguing point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In any appeal I suggest including all the text below.

 

I bring to the council's attention the matter of procedural impropriety. The council has incorrectly applied those charges specified under section 101A of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 in regard to the collection of my vehicle when the correct charges to apply are those under section 102(2A). Paragraph 1(1)(b) within Schedule 9 of the Traffic Management Act 2004 confirms this assertion and further indication is evident under paragraph 1(b) contained in the Schedule to the Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (Guidelines on Levels of Charges) (England) Order 2007.

 

As such the council had no lawful right to insist the penalty charge be paid when I collected my vehicle nor did the council have any right to administer the appeal process specified under regulation 11 of the Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (England) Representations and Appeals Regulations 2007. This regulation only applies where the applicable charges are those under section 101A of the RTRA 1984. Section 101A is made further to section 101 and therefore it only concerns the recovery of those vehicles that had the appearance of being abandoned. Appearing so either at the time of removal or sometime after.

 

Before my vehicle was removed the council served a regulation 9 PCN. The council has not only denied me the opportunity to pay the PCN within the statutory 28 day period but they have also denied me the opportunity to make an informal challenge and the right to receive and respond to an NtO. The PCN clearly bestows these rights upon me. If the council are advocating that these rights are not applicable then in essence the council is suggesting the PCN is a nullity. If the PCN is a nullity then there can be no penalty charge and thus no lawful removal. I expect a full refund shortly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the £265 included a cost of the PCN as well as the tow, then I think it has been suggested previously in CAG that you can appeal the PCN on the basis of council impropriately in that by having to pay the PCN at the same time as recovering your car, you lost your right to appeal against the PCN in the first place,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...