Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes - ignore. Because of another MET victim today I looked at all our MET cases back to June 2014 ... yes, 10 years. They have never dared take a motorist to court and argue their case before a judge.  They have started the odd court case, but as a means of trying to intimidate the motorist into coughing up, when the motorist defended and refused to give in it was MET who bottled it and discontinued.
    • Unpaid wages should be pretty straightforward if you did the work. Don't be intimidated. You need only show you were due money, and did not get money.   The risk is that they have no money to pay you (and legal fees) - frankly a solicitor maybe be costing them more than your claim is for and I might have expected them to make a commercial decision to settle before this point regardless of the merits of the case.
    • Thanks so much FTMDave.  This is so much better   I'm still tempted to leave the blue section in is as if I lose it will at least save me a little bit of money.  But I get your point that it's pretty superfluous.   Thinking I'll get this in the post on Monday unless you think it's worth delaying?   
    • Hi All I have now received a Final Reminder, which I have attached. Can you confirm that I should still ignore this letter and take no further action. It does not appear to say "Letter of Claim" anywhere on the document but I just wanted to check with you all. Many thanks FightUnfairParkingTickets Parking Charge Final Reminder issued 29th May 2024.pdf
    • Hello I am a resident of a communal block of flats owned by a Housing Association and since Tuesday 14th May 2024 Matthews and Tannert had put up scaffolding for a job on the roof last week, which was up for the best part of nine days. They had removed the scaffolding on Thursday 23rd May 2024 but my Sky box is still not working because of the satellite dish outside, and I was wondering whether the scaffolders had touched the dish while it was there and as a result had probably knocked the dish and probably made the dish go out of signal or whatever. I needed someone to check this out as well as to see my Sky box to see what could be the problem, and hopefully sort this out. I have had my Sky Digibox for many years and I have got recordings saved on them that I have had a long time - it would break my heart if I had lost them forever.       I contacted Sky but I almost made the mistake of accepting an offer where I would have to pay £31.50 and wait a whole month without television in my front room for it. I am in debt at the moment and I don't want all this on top of everything else - thankfully I have since cancelled it two weeks later when I told the person on the phone that it is the dish which is at fault as well as the fact that I live in a communal Housing Association property, and so that is one of very few weights off my mind. I emailed the Housing Association's Repairs department and they said that they will contact an electrical company to come out and see to the dish outside. I received a telephone call on Friday 24th May from the man to say that he will arrive on Wednesday 29th May 2024 to do the job. He arrived at around 9.40 am on Wednesday as promised; he went into my flat and had a look at the Sky box and saw the blue screen on my front room TV set, indicating no signal. He also looked outside as to where the dish was.  The main problem was that the ladders that he had with him were not enough to reach the dish outside as the dish was towards the top of the building - obviously the Health and Safety aspect of the job didn't allow him to do this. He then mentioned that whether he could do the job as a result of getting onto the roof and doing it like that as the dish is closer to the top. He said that he needed the key to enter the loft part of the building in order to reach this, and he needed to contact the Housing Officer at the Housing Association who had key to this, but lo and behold, he came on the Wednesday to do the job, and guess what? Wednesday was the Housing Officer's day off and so therefore he was unable to contact him for the key so that he could do the job! I just couldn't believe it myself. I am personally annoyed because this has not been sorted, and the man who came to do this is also annoyed because he came all the way to Nottingham from Peterborough, and he said to me that he won't get paid if he cannot do the job, so you see, we are both angry about this for different reasons. We are both in the same boat with regards to frustration, and we both want to see a conclusion to this, once and for all. Sometimes I wish that I didn't live in a flat which is in a communal building and I am thinking of getting a transfer to a one bedroom flat that isn't in that sort of place. I pay around £85 a month in a Direct Debit to Sky to receive their TV services which I cannot use at the moment, and I don't have much money in my bank account as it is due to one thing and another. I also pay nearly £14 a month to TV Licensing so that I can legally watch TV in my front room. I pay for Sky hence the fact that I want the Sky service in my front room and not Freeview. Also, as the General Election is coming up in five weeks' time, I want the satellite TV to be working properly so that I can catch up with what is on the news channels, and I feel rather "cut off" from that at the moment, and I want it working in time for Thursday 4th July 2024 for ovbious reasons . I have Freeview in my bedroom, but that is not the point  - I don't want to be limited to my bedroom every time I want to watch TV. I have tried putting the Freeview in te front room but it doesn't seem compatable for the same uses that I usually have Sky for.  Sunday 9th June 2024 is Day 27 of the satellite TV not working in my flat, and I feel that something needs to be done about this. You can take this message as a complaint if you like, but nevertheless, I want this message to be acknowledged and also something to be done about what has happened. I have enough on my plate with regards to health problems and depression without things like this making things worse. I would appreciate it if something was done.  I don't like naming and shaming but it is Matthews and Tannert's fault that I am in this situation in the first place, and sometimes I wish that I could sue them. In a nutshell, I have had more than enough after being without TV in the my front room for nearly four weeks. Also, at a time like this, I am missing so much of interest on TV what with the General Election comning up in just a few weeks.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wicky Versus the Halifax ***SETTLED IN FULL***


Wicky
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6220 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Great site I have been perusing different bits of it and seeing how other people are doing it. Using the spreadsheet was a breeze, especially as I had my Bank statements from the last 2.5 years when I joined the Halifax. Only took me half an hour to tot up the charges:)

As I have finally got around to adding up the charges from the bank, I know I should have done it sooner as it adds up to £785 of my money that they have. With the 8% that I can add on the court forms(see I have read the FAQ) it comes to £867.84:eek:.

Now that I see how easy that was I think I will use the advanced spreadsheet and change the interest to contractual/reciprocal interest.

19/09/2006 Halifax Prelim Letter Sent

10/11/2006 Paid into my Account £1086.84

19/02/2007 Settled remaining Contractual Interest £243.72

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I'm sending off the prelim letter today, and see how it goes. Just one thing I am concerned about though is that I know there will be some more charges before the end of the month and also cunningly they charge for the unauthorised overdraft at the end of next month. I suppose I can add these later.:razz:

19/09/2006 Halifax Prelim Letter Sent

10/11/2006 Paid into my Account £1086.84

19/02/2007 Settled remaining Contractual Interest £243.72

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has Anyone else received this, I got a letter from my branch saying that the letter has been forwarded to the Customer Relations Department. Do I still wait the 14 days from the original date of the letter? And do I now deal with the "Customer Relations" Department or my branch?

Any help would be much appreciated, as I can't seem to find this information, but I may have missed it.

19/09/2006 Halifax Prelim Letter Sent

10/11/2006 Paid into my Account £1086.84

19/02/2007 Settled remaining Contractual Interest £243.72

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recieved a standard letter and leflet from customer relations saying were sorry your unhappy blah blah complaint will be dealt with blah blah. The prelim states youll only respond to "sincere dialogue" and wont respond to standard mail.

Data Protection Request 30.06.2006

No Comply Letter 06.09.2006

Preliminary Approach 11.09.2006

Letter Before Action 25.09.2006

Halifax Offer recieved for £330.00 27.09.2006

Reply to halifax 28.09.2006

Money Claim Online Filled In 14.10.2006

Notification That Halifax Intend To Defend 24.10.2006

 

Total Claim Amount £1837.00 + Court Fees £120.00 = £1957.00

 

£1957.00 Paid in full, In your Face Hafilax

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah yes I get that, but as they seem to have passed it onto their "Customer Relations"(hah) Department, do I now send letters to them or still to my Branch?

19/09/2006 Halifax Prelim Letter Sent

10/11/2006 Paid into my Account £1086.84

19/02/2007 Settled remaining Contractual Interest £243.72

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive started corresponding with Customer relations as i had a name and reference to use.

Data Protection Request 30.06.2006

No Comply Letter 06.09.2006

Preliminary Approach 11.09.2006

Letter Before Action 25.09.2006

Halifax Offer recieved for £330.00 27.09.2006

Reply to halifax 28.09.2006

Money Claim Online Filled In 14.10.2006

Notification That Halifax Intend To Defend 24.10.2006

 

Total Claim Amount £1837.00 + Court Fees £120.00 = £1957.00

 

£1957.00 Paid in full, In your Face Hafilax

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooh got a letter today to say that they are willing to offer me £561(where do they get their amounts from?) of the charges in full and final settlement(nice of them) and the usual blah blah. I also got an unpaid DD letter again(well I must add them to claim)

Should I send usual thanks but only in partial payment letter?

And can I include any new charges, up until I make the court claim?

19/09/2006 Halifax Prelim Letter Sent

10/11/2006 Paid into my Account £1086.84

19/02/2007 Settled remaining Contractual Interest £243.72

Link to post
Share on other sites

I phoned them and the guy i spoke to said that my offer was based on six months worth of charges. I figured it would be a percentage but apparently not

Data Protection Request 30.06.2006

No Comply Letter 06.09.2006

Preliminary Approach 11.09.2006

Letter Before Action 25.09.2006

Halifax Offer recieved for £330.00 27.09.2006

Reply to halifax 28.09.2006

Money Claim Online Filled In 14.10.2006

Notification That Halifax Intend To Defend 24.10.2006

 

Total Claim Amount £1837.00 + Court Fees £120.00 = £1957.00

 

£1957.00 Paid in full, In your Face Hafilax

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tyrell, the £5 fee is normal in a request for any information and is allowable under the data protection act.

They are still adding bank charges onto my account should I send them a letter or phone them and say I am currently in dispute with them over the said bank charges?

Also I have added bank charges that have applied up to the date of the LBA but after the prelim. I understand this is okay up until I take them to court, am I correct?

19/09/2006 Halifax Prelim Letter Sent

10/11/2006 Paid into my Account £1086.84

19/02/2007 Settled remaining Contractual Interest £243.72

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have already asked but should I send a letter asking them to stop adding bank charges to my account? If not I can still add them onto the claim up until the court date can I not?

19/09/2006 Halifax Prelim Letter Sent

10/11/2006 Paid into my Account £1086.84

19/02/2007 Settled remaining Contractual Interest £243.72

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well now the court papers have been sent I guess I just wait and see what happens. What is the usual turn around on these? I have read anywhere from a couple of days to a couple of weeks, but still confused.

19/09/2006 Halifax Prelim Letter Sent

10/11/2006 Paid into my Account £1086.84

19/02/2007 Settled remaining Contractual Interest £243.72

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Wicky, I'm at the same stage as you, the court summons went in Tuesday morning. No idea what happens next, from what I've heard they say they're going to defend but then pay up anyway. Good luck, hope you get some news soon.

-------------------------------------

Action againt Halifax:

01.08.2006 Sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

25.08.06 Statements received

Calculated - they owe me £797.50 :eek:

15.09.06 Sent preliminary letter

26.09.06 received "sorry you're not happy" letter

29.09.06 LBA posted

14.10.06 Halifax offer me £439

16.10.06 Moneyclaim action filed

22.10.06 Claim acknowledged - Halifax to defend

02.11.06 SETTLED IN FULL!!!

 

Action against CapitalOne:

15.09.06 Sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

26.09.06 Received letter acknowledging S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

20.10.06 Statements received

Calculated - they owe me £392 :lol:

25.10.06 Sent preliminary letter

9.11.06 Sent LBA

--------------------------------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I still haven't heard anything should I check with the court that the claim has been processed? I will phone them tomorrow and ask if I haven't heard by the end of the day. I suppose this is the right procedure as other people who put their claim in after me have heard back.

19/09/2006 Halifax Prelim Letter Sent

10/11/2006 Paid into my Account £1086.84

19/02/2007 Settled remaining Contractual Interest £243.72

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I phoned the court yesterday and was told that Halifax would be defending the claim. I then got a letter this morning where the Halifax is offering me £945 + £100 interest. The only bit they are defending is the £248 interest on top which I have charged under reciprocity.

 

I would like to know peoples opinion as to whether I should accept this, I think I understand the priniciples behind reciprocity but it is quite a lot of money they have offered and including the interest is about the same as I would have got had I not added the 29.8% interest as per their contract

19/09/2006 Halifax Prelim Letter Sent

10/11/2006 Paid into my Account £1086.84

19/02/2007 Settled remaining Contractual Interest £243.72

Link to post
Share on other sites

The basis of not accepting would leave you in a position where, should you have to go to court, you would still very likely be awarded the charges and court costs even if the Judge agreed with the bank about the interest rate.... i.e. you don't lose the whole case simply because you lose that one part.

 

Be prepared for a little battle though and make sure you read as much as you can regarding the issue of contractual interest so that you can argue the case in court.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks I feel more comfortable now, I thought it might be the case and am trying to read as much as possible on contractual interest.

19/09/2006 Halifax Prelim Letter Sent

10/11/2006 Paid into my Account £1086.84

19/02/2007 Settled remaining Contractual Interest £243.72

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am now thoroughly confused. I replied to their letter saying I would accept it as part payment. They immediately paid this into my bank. But they still haven't responded to my letter or put in a proper defence apart from to say they will be disputing the entire claim.

I phoned court and they think it most odd that they have paid some when they say they are disputing the entire amount, and said wait on their defence papers when they come in.

I will wait to see what happens, meanwhile here is some music to listen to "twingly, twing twing twang twingly......"

19/09/2006 Halifax Prelim Letter Sent

10/11/2006 Paid into my Account £1086.84

19/02/2007 Settled remaining Contractual Interest £243.72

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Aha,

They have filed their defence and I now need to put in a response. They are arguing that I am not entitled to the contractual interest and they have already paid me 8%. I will put the full defence they have given a bit later. I now need to think of a suitable response.

19/09/2006 Halifax Prelim Letter Sent

10/11/2006 Paid into my Account £1086.84

19/02/2007 Settled remaining Contractual Interest £243.72

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right so their defence is

1. The Defendant is a bank. The claimant has a current account with the Defendant having a roll number D/########-#("The Current Account")

2. The Claimant appears to be claiming for bank charges applied to the current account in the last 6 years(wrong it is only 4 years)

3. The Claimant has provided particulars stating that his claim relates to bank charges incurred on his Current Account but the Particulars fail to specify how much the claimant is the Claimant is claiming in respect of actual charges.(I sent a list of charges from the spreadsheet with the claim) However, these charges were debited to the Current Account in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Current Account ("The Account Conditions"). which the claimant agreed to accept (having no choice in the matter) and by which he is bound (not if it an unfair contract). Under the Account Conditions, the Defendant is entitled to apply charges to the Current Account, inter alia and so far is relevant to the claim for:

(a) each calendar month, when a debit balance on the Current Account exceed any authorised overdraft limit;

(b) refusing to honour payment instructions issued by the Claimant where there are insufficient funds available for withdrawal from the Current Account (after taking into consideration any authorised overdraft limit);

and

© honouring payment instructions issued by the Claimant where the overdraft limit has already been exceeded, or is exceeded as a result of honouring the payment instruction.

4. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Defendant has, without admission of liability refunded £1086.84 to the Claimant. The sum represents all the bank charges the Claimant has incurred in the 6 years (I only had the bank account 4 years)prior to the issue of proceedings, being £986, together with interest of £100.44.

5. The remainder of the claim £243.72 relates to interest claimed at 29.8%. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to claim interest at this rate.(Why not you do. How do I argue this again)

6. On the basis of matters pleaded above, the Defendant denies that it is liable to the Claimant of £243.72 in respect of the balance of the claim or for any other sum.

 

So what I want to know is do I need to argue point 2,3 and 4 in respect of they obviously don't know what they are doing in getting how long I had the account for? In claiming the extra £243.72 as reciprocal, do I just quote the relevant passages for the statutes? I will put a preliminary response up here in the next couple of days, if someone could look it over that would be great.

19/09/2006 Halifax Prelim Letter Sent

10/11/2006 Paid into my Account £1086.84

19/02/2007 Settled remaining Contractual Interest £243.72

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if any one is interested:confused: I have filled in the allocation questionaire thusly.

The Defendant has paid back the amount of £1086.84. This is erroneously specified as the bank charges in the last 6 years whereas I have only been with the Bank for just over 3 years. The £986 specified is the amount they have charged me in fees. They have also paid £100.44 at I assume 8% interest over that period.

They also claim that I have not specified how much I am claiming in actual charges which is clearly erroneous as I included a Schedule of Claim for Charges when entering my claim form to the court, and has also sent them copies of it prior to entering proceedings.

I am still claiming the £243.72 which is the amount remaining; if they charged me interest for an unauthorised overdraft fee this would be how much more they would charge if not more. Due to the terms of the contract I believe that this is justified under the principle of mutuality and reciprocity and is based on their unauthorised borrowing rate of 29.8%.

I am also claiming at a rate of £0.75031 per day from the day I claimed at the same percentage.

As you can see I think I have applied the principle of mutuality/reciprocity correctly if not can anyone help me argue it correctly if it gets to court, just give me a few pointer I'm sure I can pick up the rest.

19/09/2006 Halifax Prelim Letter Sent

10/11/2006 Paid into my Account £1086.84

19/02/2007 Settled remaining Contractual Interest £243.72

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

To be fair, this sounds like a reply to their defense - is that right? I tnink you might be best to simply put in the amount in dispute (section D?) and also make sure you read this http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html so that include the section where we ask for disclosure. If you want to make further reference to the amount outstanding, then put that on a separate note and make reference to "additional information" that you have supplied.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I kept forgetting to update it as they had paid the amount of charges but were still arguing over the contractual interest. They have now paid on full. So I just need to tell the court.

19/09/2006 Halifax Prelim Letter Sent

10/11/2006 Paid into my Account £1086.84

19/02/2007 Settled remaining Contractual Interest £243.72

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations..................!!!!!!!:D :d :D

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...