Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025 | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM The EHang EH216-S autonomous flying taxi is the first eVTOL ready for mass production and could lead the way for flying cars around...  
    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
    • hahah except I can't locate the courier to frighten them with it hahaha   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Gross Misconduct?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4700 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just been told I am being disciplined for gross misconduct. I work in a warehouse and was caught on camera using a pump/pallet truck as a scooter. I had to move pallets from one side of the warehouse to the other and on the way back to get a pallet I used the truck as a scooter. I know this is stupid but can it really be classed as gross misconduct? What do you think my next step should be, any advice?

 

I have worked for the company for a long time and hope this will help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, and welcome to the CAG...

 

a) How long have you been working there?

b) Do you have in your possession your contract/statement of employment particulars and your handbook of employment?

 

If your answer to (b) is 'yes', then under the clause related to 'disciplinary and grievance' you may find a chapter dedicated to 'gross misconduct'... Do check if anywhere you may find your misconduct under that head...

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thank you for the reply.

 

Close to 7 years and I dont have the handbook to hand, but it does mention breaking health and safety in the gross misconduct section

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to get that handbook, as it would precisely state what they understand as constituting 'gross misconduct'...

 

What did that letter (if you received any) state in terms of disciplinary?...

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How are your past records in terms of disciplinary?

 

You really need that handbook now! :-)

 

[...and Hi, Lady Rachel!...]

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As BRB said, get a copy of the company handbook/disciplinary procedure.

Are you in a union?

You need to arrange for a representative (either a union rep or a work colleague) to accompany you. Then you need to prepare a statement to present to the hearing.

Is this practice widespread? Do you feel you're being singled out for some reason?

Link to post
Share on other sites

And would you be so kind as to reproduce that letter on the forum, ommitting names, and company, please?

 

Thank you!

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Suspension from work

 

As a result of the serious incident/allegations made against you on xx/xx/xx you are suspended from work on full pay to allow us the opportunity to investigate the circumstances. Please do not attend work until xx/xx/xx when you are required to be present at a disciplinary hearing at xx:xx. General managers office.

 

In summary, the allegation is at xx:xx pm on (day) xx/xx/xx you breached the company health and safety policy and procedure, as you misused a pump truck in the warehouse as you were using the pump truck as a skateboard.

 

Any relevent documents arising from our investigation will be provided to you in advanced of this hearing

 

In accordance with paragraph 4 of the disciplinary procedure in the staff handbook you have the right to bring to this meeting a work colleague or a union representitive of your choice. It is your responsibilty to ensure that your chosen representitive is available at the above time.

 

You are advised that the allegations being considered are serious and that they could result in your dismissal for gross misconduct, so it is very important that you prepare carefully for this hearing.

 

-----------------------------------------

 

CCTV was checked to find evidence for a serious incident, they spotted 2 of us using the pump truck this way and we are both being called up for disciplinary.

 

I will get a staff handbook.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks...

 

a) Are there been other instances where such a vehicle has been used in this way?... If yes, do you remember if the member of staff has been dealt with in he same way?

b) Have you been issued with warnings and/or awards in the past, and if yes, have they lapsed or are there any still live?

c) In your honest opinion, did you use that vehicle in a dangerous manner which could have put any of your colleagues, in your vicinity at the time, or yourself at risk? (You may reply to this one in a PM to those interested by the answer, so as to not to admit to anything)

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the handbook. The only thing that this can be covered under is "Gross negligence leading to a loss of company property, injury or similar"

 

a) The opinion of most in the company is that ever body uses the pump trucks like that, I dont think anyone has been dealt with though. This isn't something I can prove.

b) I have had issues in the past with absence/punctuality. But at present nothing is active, its been a couple of years since.

c) There was no one in this section of the warehouse, except me and the other person who is in trouble. So I don't think I put anyone in danger.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the challenge you face is to show that there is inconsistant treatment here. You need to show that this practice is commonplace, yet usually no action is taken- highlighting perhaps that there is some ulterior motive for their taking action against you.

I think though that you've little else in the way of a defence than to be very remorseful and hope that they let you off with a warning.

Larking around on a pallet truck could quite reasonably be seen to be a breach of H&S, and certainly if they were to dismiss you I think an ET would consider that dismissal is within the range of reasonable responses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...