Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • @jk2054 retailer said they'd speak to dpd on Tuesday. I don't want to screw the retailer because they were doing me a favour by fixing it for free so I hope dpd will refund them so they don't lose out.   Will keep you guys posted. 
    • Well, we live on the same road so it should be the same postcode. When I spoke to dpd and asked why were my neighbours' address not on the list and she said maybe they're not of the same postcode and I checked and they definitely were. Not to mention, delivery instructions are supposed to override actual customer's address which is why they asked for instructions I thought.
    • again a quick google search states Appeal a DVLA fine - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) i would not be appealing mind. it's only a summary charge which they rarely do court on and pass out the powerless DCA's whom are not bailiffs they have 6mts. see where they go. as you've sorn'd it will probably be nulled. dx  
    • There are a number of reasons why you may not have been issued a notice in the post within 14 days. If you were stopped by the police it may have been given verbally. In the case of speeding offences, the police may issue you with a conditional offer of a fixed penalty of 3 points and £100.00 fine by post or an offer of a speed awareness course. If the offence is considered too serious for a speed awareness course or fixed penalty you may be charged with an offence which normally occurs by way of the issue of a Single Justice Procedure Notice. If the vehicle within which the alleged offence took place was registered to another person or company there is technically no need for a notice to be issued to the driver. After the police have obtained details of the nominated the driver, they will normally send the notice to them, although there are no time limits within which they must do so (provided that the notice was received within 14 days by the registered keeper of the vehicle). In such circumstances, a person may receive a notice several months after the alleged offence too place but still be prosecuted. A Guide to a Notice of Intended Prosecution | Motoring Offence Lawyers the above copy n paste link has purely been copy n pasted here to inform you of the regs, which you could have done yourself by, as this is, a google search......... we do not ever recommend using such offered webservices! dont dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help, dementia sufferer sent back home


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4664 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The doctor has told my mother in law that my father in law must go into care, as she is now looking unwell, on top of all this my sister in law is currently undergoing chemotherapy, so even more stress for her.

 

Earlier this week, I think it was respite, they left my father in law in a care home that has special care for dementia sufferers, a little sigh of relief for my mother in law and my sister in law to have a little breathing space.

Later that day, I think, they sent my father in law back home in handcuffs by the police!! Saying he was getting very agitated.

 

Why have a care home for dementia sufferers, then send him home as not being able to cope with him.

 

All this has really upset everyone, doesn't anyone care anymore?*

 

Where do we go now?

 

Terry

Link to post
Share on other sites

In handcuffs! Wow thats disgraceful, I guess the home was for dementia sufferers but unable to give drugs to alleviate the condition. If thats what he needed rather than someone who is capable at dealing with such people. I am sure someone will advice shortly, be patient for them to help.

My father in law wento into a home for 2 weeks respite but escaped and ended up in hospital drugged up, went from able to walk 25 miles with me to steptoe in a day!

My own dad was getting difficult at home so went into a home and although not all the staff were experienced enough to help him without getting abuse, the top nurse there was very good with him although he had to be mildly sedated on a daily basis. The respite place my F-in-Law went into really wasnt suited for dementia AT ALL and could give drugs etc. He shouldn`t have gone there.

 

Its a very tough time for you I know. Good luck in the mean time. Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have any answers to questions yet?

 

Get back to the GP and, if they were involved, Social Services.

 

Also, maybe contact your local Patient Liaison Service to see if your mother in law/ your wife have any recourse to complaint and what can be put right.

 

Maybe also contact the police to find out exactly why it was considered necessary to handcuff your father in law because that could have caused more than distress for the family, but could have knocked him back considerably.

 

Remember it's not just now that the problem has occurred but that over time, this incident may well come back to haunt him and cause a worsening of his condition.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi guys, sorry it's been awhile, and thanks for your words of support.

Now for an update, the handcuffs were not used, mother-in-law trying to to make us smile, although he was brought home in a police car, but the police were ok, as they had done this type of work before!

Father-in-law back in hospital having assessments as to what drugs will help, and what type of care he will need. In all probability, he will need to go into a nursing home as my mother-in-law says she cannot cope. She had carers coming in twice a day, but he has defo got worse. On top of this some of his clothes have gone missing at the hospital where he is!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...