Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Loan sold on to Apex


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4743 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good afternoon all!

 

Quick question for you. I'm a bit of a newbie to all of this so please forgive me if the answer is elsewhere. There's so much information in these forums!!

 

I took out a loan way back in 2002 (I think) with Egg. This went on for a few years and I ended up borrowing about 13.5k. In 2007 I was in a particularly sticky domestic situation and was advised to default on my loan for one month by a debt 'management' company, who I got to manage my debt as I couldn't face reality. Didn't think anything of it, kept paying them, had no correspondence from Egg. Unfortunately in 2007 through circumstances I lost a lot of paperwork I had in the house and I do not have any of the official credit agreement information from Egg. Fast forward to 2009, and I was in a much more secure life/financial position so I started managing my own debts again. I contacted Egg to let them know this and set up a direct standing order, as previously payments had been made via the debt management company.

 

No contact from Egg except annual statements, continued paying at the £130 monthly payment agreed by the debt management company, they stopped any interest on the account. Cool beans. In November last year I moved house and forgot to update Egg, I had so little contact with them it wasn't top of my list, I wasn't worried as long as they were getting paid. As luck would have it, 9 days after my moving house they sold my loan on to Apex. I didn't find out until February when one of the tenants in the new house forwarded me a letter. Apex had apparently sent 7 letters previously - I'm not convinced, but that's not the point. The letter said they had verified my old address as my current address and that if I didn't sort out my "arrears" then they would send a field agent round.

 

Apex inform me they now own my debt and that I should pay them, fine. Started doing that, no problem, seemed ok when I spoke to them in a panic when I got the first letter! However, last week they have started calling me. Not excessively, but leaving me messages saying 'you need to call us today' which got me worried. Turns out they're just trying to get more money out of me. The person I spoke to asked if I could release equity on my house (I rent!) or if I could borrow money from elsewhere or somehow get some extra cash to "improve" my credit rating. Robbing Peter to Pay Paul does not strike me as a good idea. He also said that I have to submit a financial statement so that they can judge whether I can pay more or not.

 

What they haven't done is informed me of the process of what happens when they "judge" me to see if I can pay more every month and what happens if we disagree on this matter. They haven't informed me how they will use this information and there is no detail on their website.

 

Whilst I am not skint, I have a comfy lifestyle but I live within my means. I do have a stash of savings put to one side, but this is for the new car I am obliged to buy for work use as they pay me a monthly 'car allowance' etc. I can't not buy the car else I'll lose the allowance, which I currently use to live on. I don't want to declare this to the company as I have no doubt they will attempt to take it all from me and then I would be £400 a month worse off as I would lose the car allowance as I wouldn't be able to afford to buy another car within the specification.

 

Anyway, I have been reading some threads on here and I can see that the debt might not be enforceable if they can't produce a credit agreement and wonder if I might be able to use that in my situation? Their most recent letter said my original agreement date was 01/01/2006 so I can't help feeling they might not have the paperwork... Pretty sure I did it all online.

 

Morally I'm not sure if I agree with trying to get a debt written off, after all I took the money and I spent it, but equally I was earning £13.5k a year and they lent me £13.5k, probably not the best decision on their part.

 

I have always always paid the loan except for the one month when I was advised not to by the debt management people. This default is showing on my credit rating and hasn't been updated since 2007, there is no reflection of the payments I have made since on there and I'm not sure if this is because I've paid, but not the amount they want.

 

Anyway, wondering if there's a way out of this, I owe them just under £6k so I'm getting there. Also wondering if they can demand a financial statement (I guess so?) and what they can do with it if they think I've got more money to give them?! Apex's attitude on the phone is less than helpful, every person I have spoken to so far has treated me like I've just run over their cat, so I don't hold much hope for friendly negotiations.

 

All help will be greatly appreciated, sorry to waffle on, and thank you! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Firstly, stay off the phone! DCAs use the phone as their tool of choice to 'encourage' you to pay more and more at the expense of other debts.

 

You could CCA them. If they cannot supply, you may withhold payment until they do supply but this doesn't mean it is unenforceable. what it does do is to put you in a strong position to offer a Full and Final settlement at a greatly reduced amount.

 

What you could also do is fill out a financial statement for yourself and then tell them (in writing) that you have worked out that XX is what you have decided you can pay. they have no absolute right to demand an income and expenditure form from you but they can also become stuffy if you don't.

 

Do you know if you had any late payment charges or PPI on this account? If so, you could try a reclaim, reducing the debt even more.

 

You know what annoys me. You are paying them £130 per month yet still they want more. that's just greedy.

 

I would send the original creditor a SAR (in library-top left) to see what they have added

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

And of course, an absolute NO NO is for them to be suggesting that you release equity in your home (I know you rent) or borrow the money from friends or family to pay the dca.

 

They cannot demand a financial statement. Income and Expenditure etc....only a Judge can request that.

 

The main thing here is to remember that you are in control of your finances....not them. You tell them what they are going to get, not the other way round.

 

Chances are that Apex bought this debt from Egg for a snip and are now tryng it on. I would guess that the debt may be made up of a lot of charges and/or ppi which you can claim back.

 

Start investigating this area.

 

And remember...only pay them what you can realistically afford...but get a sar off (unless you have all the statements) and cca Apex.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...