Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • IMG_2820-IMG_2820-merged.pdfmerged.pdf Case management was this morning. Here is the Sheriff’s order. Moved case forward to 24/05.   He said there was no signed agreement and after a bit of “erm, erm, yeah but, erm” when he asked them, he allowed time for sol to contact claimant.  what is the next step now? thank you UCM  
    • I've had a quick (well, quick for a thread of this length),  read of this thread and to be honest I'm struggling to make heads nor tails of the actual crux of the issue here. You seem awfully convinced that whatever is going on is worth the fight and the odds are in your favour but with how the thread has gone it seems that one trail goes cold so you simply move on to another in an attempt to delay the inevitable. All it does is end up digging holes and confusing others and yourself which means any advice given to you is completely pointless. I note that for the life of this thread there has not been any documentation or correspondence uploaded for people to have a look. Have you got any that you'd be willing to redact and upload for members to assist you? Right now, it seems people are shooting out advice while being in the dark because it's starting to become very difficult for people who weren't here at the start of this (including myself) to follow along. Right now, this whole thread is just hypothetical "He said, she said" and is going nowhere fast. Nothing more than basic advice can be given which, as you've sought out some legal advice, is likely not sufficient to actually come to any sort of conclusion. I, personally, am starting to agree with others that it may be best to consider bankruptcy and put the matter behind you.  
    • Thanks for coming back to us. There are no guarantees - but remember that so far MET have not had the guts to put even a single case before a judge.  Not once. Yours is one of seven court cases. Three ongoing like yours. In two MET bottled it as Witness Statement stage approached. In one the allocating judge decided their Particulars of Claim were rubbish and threw the case in the bin. Just the one victory by MET by default when the motorist stupidly didn't file a defence. So there is every chance that MET will throw in the towel in your case too if you stand firm. Please keep us informed of what is happening. Regarding being abroad, that is no reason for things going wrong, you can request an on-line hearing and we've had several cases where the PPC gave up when the motorist moved abroad. But please keep us in the loop.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DelinquentWoody -v- Ashbourne Management


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4672 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks for this, I will adapt this letter for my own situation with Ashbourne (and my friend's) and pop it in the post recorded tomorrow.

 

I'm wondering, is there any potential to demand a refund of any monies paid due to it being an unenforceable contract? The ruling seems to say that 12 months is an acceptable period but beyond that isn't. So would it be reasonable to request a refund of monies paid beyond the 12 month period, bearing in mind I only used the gym for the first 3 months of the contract? (I have paid 19 months so far on a 36 month contract).

 

Advice appreciated! Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also just another thought, could it be worth putting a point in the letter to ask for written confirmation from them that the membership is cancelled and no more money is owed to them? Just for our peace of mind!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DW,

 

I've moved your posts into your own thread to avoid hijacking.

 

In your case, I think you may have difficulty getting a refund of payments made beyond 12 months. You could certainly try but, if AM refuse, I'm not sure if you could prove such a case in court as the Claimant.

 

It was, after all, your own choice to NOT use the facilities beyond the first 3 months.

 

You would seem to have good cause to stop paying any more and cancel your DD to AM.

 

The Judgement of The Hon Judge Kitchin is here - http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2011/1237.html&query=ashbourne&method=boolean

 

The OFT report is here and this includes the relevant contracts - http://www.oft.gov.uk/OFTwork/consumer-enforcement/consumer-enforcement-current/ashbourne/

 

8-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks slick132 and thanks to Bullitt742 for creating the letter that I have based mine on.

 

This is the letter I'm planning on sending, the main amendment I have made is the addition of the 4th point to ask for the refund. I know it's unlikely I'll get anything but I guess I've got nothing to lose by trying! Feedback before I send the letter of would be appreciated :)

 

Ashbourne Management Services Ltd

Marlborough House

679 Warwick Road

Solihull, West Midlands

B91 3DAR

 

To whom it may concern,

 

Membership Reference

 

I have cancelled my direct debit to Ashbourne Management for the gym membership as I no longer use the facility.I would like to bring to your attention the court case against yourselves regarding the investigation carried out by the OFT (Office of Fair Trading).

 

As the ruling covers every aspect of Ashbourne Management’s Terms & Conditions of contracts I will highlight specifically which points within the Judge’s ruling are specific in my case.

 

1) I would like to highlight Section 1, paragraphs 1, 2 & 3 of the Judge's ruling;“Various terms of Ashbourne's standard form agreements are unfair contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. In particular:-

 

Terms in contracts 1 to 10 which required consumers to pay in full for the remainder of the minimum membership period if they wished to cancel during this period. This was both because the minimum term operated as a "trap"; for consumers who overestimate the use they are likely to make of the gym, and also because the contracts unfairly gave Ashbourne the right to demand too much in payment. -

 

Terms in contracts 6, 8, 9 & 10, which require the consumer to give cancellation notices to Ashbourne, rather than the gym. In fact the contracts were between the gym and the consumer, and so the consumer should be able to deal directly with the gym.”

 

2) Further to this, your conduct regarding communications to me are in breach of the Consumer Protection From Unfair Trading Regulation 2008. I would like to highlight Section 4 paragraphs 1, 2 & 4 of the Judge's ruling;

 

“Ashbourne has engaged in unfair commercial practices contrary to the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008. In particular:- Including contract terms that do not properly set out the consumer's rights -for example because they are unfair or otherwise poorly drafted.- Reporting or threatening to report sums to credit references agencies where the sum owed was unfair, merely a claim for damages, otherwise not due or was disputed by the consumer.”

 

3) I would like to acknowledge that Ashbourne Management’s conduct within the communications to myself contradict the instructions given to Ashbourne Management by the OFT. I would like to highlight Section 5 of the Judge's ruling;“The Judge also noted that Ashbourne had already undertaken to the OFT not to:-

 

exaggerate the significance or consequences of reporting sums to Credit Reference Agencies;-

 

threaten to report consumers to credit reference agencies without also informing them of their rights to access and correct their records;-

 

send letters from a "litigation department" that does not exist, or otherwise threaten legal proceedings when it has no intention to issue such proceedings.”

 

With points I have raised and including the Judge’s ruling regarding Ashboune Management’s working practises and illegal conduct, I conclude that I do not owe Ashbourne Management any further payments and consider this matter closed.

 

Any further communications by Ashbourne Management or ARC Europe Ltd will be forwarded to my solicitor for legal action.

 

4) In addition I would also like to raise the point from the Judge's ruling: "The judge.. ruled that the minimum terms in ten of the contracts [including my contract] were completely unfair.. if they tie the consumer in for more than 12 months."

 

As the Judge's ruling says that gym memberships over 12 months are illegal (unfair to the consumer), I have paid my membership beyond these months unnecesarily as I have previously tried to cancel the membership in the 12th month but was incorrectly told by yourselves I was not allowed to as I was tied into a 3 year contract which is now deemed illegal and unenforcable as the contract duration is longer than 12 months.

 

Now this has come to light I am demanding a refund of all monies paid beyond twelve months. I have not used the gym since month 12 as I did not wish my membership to continue beyond this time as I informed you at the time.Along with my refund I also ask you to send written confirmation that this contract has now ceased and upon refunding of my excess membership fees paid that no further payments by either party will be required.

 

A copy of this letter, which has been sent to yourselves by recorded mail, has been forwarded to my solicitor.

 

Regards,

Edited by slick132
Edited into para, to format better.
Link to post
Share on other sites

HI DW,

 

I've formatted the above post so it's legible. :-)

 

Let us know what response you get.

 

I expect it may take a while as they are likely to be rather busy.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Have just had a reply from them nearly 6 weeks later - and guess what, it's the bog standard letter to say I haven't paid the membership. This is what it says.

 

Dear Member

 

We handle the monthly payment collections for the above, and according to our records the most recent instalment of your membership has not been paid. Now that this has happened, please cancel your existing arrangement with your bank and complete and return to us the new Direct Debit mandate overleaf. Please organise immediate payment of £22.20 to cover your arrears and our administration charge.

 

There are four ways in which you can bring your payments up to date [etc etc]

 

Please organise payment and the setting up of the Direct Debit IMMEDIATELY as your membership is now in arrears. If you require any assistance please contact our Customer Services Team.

 

Your Faithfully,

 

Collections Dept.

 

So, it sounds like they have ignored my letter which I sent recorded delivery! What should I do now for the best? I have already advised them my membership is cancelled and have cancelled the direct debit and I do not owe any more money.

 

Help!

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reply to them saying :-

 

You have obviously chosen to ignore my letter dated xxxx.

 

Accordingly, this matter is now in clear dispute and you must stop making any demands until you properly address my previous letter.

 

Any further demands will be a clear breach of the OFT Debt Collection Guidelines and will be reported to the FOS accordingly.

 

Also, as the High Court made it very clear that Ashbourne's 3 year contracts were unenforceable, I will complain about the contempt you show for the High Court's ruling.

 

If you register any adverse credit data about me, I will take court action against you to have it removed and to seek damages.

 

I now require your written confirmation within 7 days, that you will cease all collection activity.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...