Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Probably to do with the Creditor accepting the reduced payments claim as part of the IVA. - Thats my guess anyway.  As for the mount outstanding... 60k is incredible and im pretty sure a DRO wouldnt cover that much even after the new legislation.    For you @Alfy - Please stay headstrong and stop worrying. My viewpoint on debt with debt collectors is simple. You are a figure on a spreadsheet loaded into a database for them to run a collection cycle through.  They dont care about emotions or your situation, they just care about paying off their shareholders and trying to turn a profit.  They use varying tactics to increase the pressure on you to the point where you will break. People then fall for this an either cave in to DCAs before doing their own due diligence on the debts that are purchased or turn to IVAs like you have.    They are better ways to handle this and Im glad you feel better after a good nights sleep - I hope you can keep it up. 
    • Good afternoon,    I am writing in reference to the retail dispute number ****, between myself and Newton Autos concerning the sale of a Toyota Avensis which has been found to have serious mechanical faults.    As explained previously the car was found to be faulty just six days after purchase. The car had numerous fault codes that appeared on the dash board and went into limp mode. This required assistance from the AA and this evidence has already been provided. The car continues to exhibit these faults and has been diagnosed as having faults with the fuel injectors which will require major mechanical investigation and repairs.    Newton Autos did not make me aware of any faults upon purchase of the vehicle and sold it as being in good condition.    Newton Autos have also refused to honour their responsibilities under The Consumer Rights Act 2015 which requires them to refund the customer if the goods are found to be faulty and not fit for purpose within 30 days of purchase.    Newton Autos also refused to accept my rejection of the vehicle and refused to refund the car and accept the return of the vehicle.    It is clear to me that the car is not fit for purpose as these mechanical faults occurred so soon after purchase and have been shown to be present by both the AA and an independent mechanic.   Kind regards
    • Commercial Landlords are legally allowed to sue for early cancellation of the lease. You can only surrender your lease if your landlord agrees to your doing so. They are under no obligation even to consider your request and are entitled to refuse. You cannot use this as an excuse not to pay your rent. Your landlord is most likely to agree to your surrendering the lease if they want the property back in order to redevelop it, or if they wants to rent it to what they regards as a better tenant or at a higher rent. There are two types of surrender: Express surrender in writing. This is a written document which sets out the terms of the surrender. Implied surrender by conduct. (applies to your position) You can move out of the property you leased, simply hand your keys back and the lease will come to an end, but only if the landlord agrees to accept your surrender. Many tenants have thought they can simply post the keys through the landlord's letter box and the lease is ended. This is not true and without a document from the landlord, not only do you not know if the landlord has accepted the surrender, you also do not know on what basis they have accepted and could find they sue you for rent arrears, service charge arrears, damage to the property and compensation for your attempt to leave the property without the landlord's agreement. Unless you are absolutely certain that the landlord is agreeable to your departure, you should not attempt to imply a surrender by relying on your and the landlord's conduct.  
    • I had to deal with these last year worst DCA I have ever dealt with. Just wait for the constant threats of CCJ and how you'll lose in court and how they won't do mediation and they want the judge to question you with a load of "BIG" words to boot with the letter. My case was struck out in the end, stupidity on their part as I admitted to owing the debt in the end going through the court process was just a formality as they wouldn't let it drop despite me admitting the debt regardless. They didn't send the last part of the court paper work in so it ended up being struck out     .
    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Charge for payment of money


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4719 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I have a charge for payment of money that landed on my doorstep whilst I was on holiday and I am now sick to the stomach.

 

Here are the details

 

PURSUER American Express (head office address)

DEFENDER My name (Address I have never lived at)

 

I have never had an American Express account!!!!

 

It says that a decree was granted against me in December 2009 - I never received any details of this. I called the court and they stated the address - it corresponds to the above address of the defender - an address I have never lived at.

 

I have called the solicitors acting on behalf of the pursuer and they are confident that its me because the name and date of birth are the same. I have pleaded with them to investigate this further but they said that everything matches and as far as they are concerned the debt is mine, They are now threatning to arrest my wages or declare me bankrupt as the amount owed is 3 and a half grand.

 

My credit report does not show the decree. I have a perfect report - not a single missed payment for anything, ever! I have 14 days as from the 12th may to pay up or wage arrestment, bankruptcy or god knows what.

 

If they have this charge does that mean that they can go straight to wage arrestment or bankruptcy or can I fight my case in court?

 

Kind Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont know if this matters but the charge for payment of money was delivered through my letterbox but had my neighbours address on it - this is in addition to the mistake already made with the address i never lived at.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will have to recall the decree ASAP. You can download the info and forms from the sheriff courts web site or visit your local cab. A lot of courts will also have an in court advice service and the court will give you their details.

You will get the chance to tell the sheriff your side of the story as the recall sets the case back to a position before the decree was granted and a hearing date will be set. You must attend court on this date.

 

Good luck

 

B

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and thank you very much for the response. Will a judge let me recall the decree after all this time? Am I right in saying that the solicitors could just issue another decree? Then I'd be going round in circles

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to have a good reason to recall, but if it's not your debt then you have to do this.

You might be asked why did you not defend the case at the first stages- presumably you didn't get the paperwork?

 

The solicitors can't just issue a decree. It has to go through certain stages. Once it's recalled it goes back to the hearing stages and you can defend on the basis that you don't owe this money.

 

You have to recall ASAP though

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks.

 

Found the forms but not sure how to fill in the part where it says "in this case*"

 

 

 

Minute for recall of decree - service copy

 

Sheriff Court: (place)

 

Court ref. no.:

 

(pursuer) against (defender(s))

 

The *(pursuer/defender) moves the court to recall the decree pronounced on (date) in this case * and in which execution of a charge/arrestment was effected on (date)

 

Reason for failure to appear or be represented:

 

 

 

 

Proposed defence/answer:

 

 

*delete as appropriate

 

 

NOTE: You must return the summons to the sheriff clerk at the court mentioned at the top of this form by (insert date 2 days before the date of the hearing.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so I am going to court tomorrow to recall the decree but i have this question - When a decree is recalled does the judge automatically set another date for the decree to be reconsidered or would the pursuer have to manually set this date themselves after finding out about the recall of decree?

 

One other question - and I don't mean to sound stupid but the only thing I know about court is what I see from the judge and jury dramas/movies! Does the judge have to have absolute proof that this debt is mine or does he have to consider the facts and make an informed decision? The reason I ask this is because I believe that someone used the same name and date of birth as me (coincidence or fraud - it doesn't really matter) to open this account and deliberately avoid paying it. The evidence that the pursuer will show is that someone with my name opened this account - that doesn't prove it was me.

 

I think that some clever person has done a search on my name and date of birth and traced me and thought "it must be him, we'll chase him for it!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming the sheriff agrees to the recall another hearing date will be set.

 

At the hearing you will put forward your defence, and yes the sheriff will have to be satisfied that you owe the debt before he will grant another decree.

 

Please try to find an in court adviser to assist you. You have to listen very carefully to the sheriff as he will almost certainly help guide you but won't be able to tell you outright what to say or ask. If you feel it's going your way ask for the case to be dismissed if the sheriff doesn't actually say this himself.

He may very well continue the case fir more info to be submitted to him.

 

Make sure you are clear and concise in your presentation

 

B

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so I have handed in the forms to recall the decree.

 

A few more questions though..

 

1- Do I have to show up in person to court or can I send a representative?

 

2- If the sheriff decides in favour of american express and the decree is granted again, will I have to pay the original decree amount or do I have to pay the interest that has accrued since the original decree?

 

3- If I wanted to settle this and make amex a full and final offer and they accepted before the court date, would we just inform the sheriff? I'm trying to get a mortgage ASAP and I'm seriously considering just paying this to get rid of it and be happy in a house with my partner!

 

Again thank you to everyone who helps - there may be more questions!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. It's better to be there yourself. Not going suggests indifference.

 

2. I'm not sure about that one

 

3. If you have enough money to settle then maybe you should. If the decree is recalled, then you settle while there is no decree against you, you might fare better with a mortgage application.

You would probably still have to go to the hearing to inform the sheriff of the settlement and make sure Amex don't do anything sneaky

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks bluedogx

 

I will go to the hearing settlement or no settlement.

If Amex have their money do you think they would even bother showing up to the hearing just to tell the judge it was settled? I'm really hoping they don't so I can kindly ask the judge not to reissue the decree, even if satisfied. I could just ask him to bin it altogether (don't know the legal term) after all I would have settled a debt that isn't mine!

 

Please also correct me if i'm wrong but I understand the following to be true -

 

I have recalled the decree so no action can be taken against me until a court date has been set and the judge has decided.

 

If the account is not mine would I still be able to contest the debt on the grounds that it is unenforcable without admitting the debt is actually mine because they might have made a mistake in the paperwork.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK so i'm not going to settle - will just wait on a court date being sent to me from the judge.

 

From what I've read on this forum the next step would be to SAR American Express.

 

When I spoke to Amex's solicitors I asked if there was any photocopies of ID from when the account was setup and they said that no ID was taken when the account was setup. Is that even legal?? Any credit card I've ever opened has always demanded 2 forms of ID. How can they possibly take someone to court on the basis of a signature on an application form and nothing else??

 

Kind Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do go and speak to the in court advisor. They know the system and the Sheriffs and can accompany you on the first calling. These financial institutions could not give a fig as to whether or not the debt is yours. All they want is their money. You'll need to dig out proof of where you were living at the time of the summons being issued and for when you were supposed to have entered the agreement with Am Ex. If you don't have anything you can ask the council for copies of council tax bills or banks for statements etc. Do as much work on this as you can now so that your not rushing about later. You will need to check credit reports from Experian, Equifax and Call Credit to be certain there is nothing in your name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...