Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • See what you think of the attached. I have to do some proofreading of an English grammar book for an Italian publisher this weekend - for money! - so I'm afraid corrections and suggestions will come in dribs & drabs.  I've totally knackered the layout, the numbering and the order of your Exhibits but there will be several versions done so don't worry about that ATM. Your arguments are superb. What is less superb is the way you jump from one to the other and back again, so I haven't changed your words, but I have moved the paragraphs around and given each section a heading. New bits are shown in red. Crossed out crossed out in black is something you've quoted from the government Code of Practice, but that has since been withdrawn so unfortunately that argument has to go. Your paras 7 & 8 don't harm your case but to me are waffle and can go.  Keeping the arguments clear & concise will always impress a judge. IMPORTANT - did you ever send Simple Simon a CPR request? Defendant's WS - version 2.pdf
    • Björn Ulvaeus appeared on stage in East Yorkshire at a conference held at the Bridlington Spa.View the full article
    • Hi Schipoo and thanks for the update. This is a brilliant result as rergards your fight with HMRC. If you can manage a Donation to the site, it would be greatly appreciated. Let us know how it goes as regards the fees being sought by Independant Tax.
    • A never ending torrent of **it Outrage as ‘tidal wave’ of sewage floods historic market town’s unique chalk river WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: Water firm pumps sewage into river Misbourne, Amersham on 21 ‘dry days’ during nearly five month period  
    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrow Global (dept I don't owe, they claim I do)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4720 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

Arrow Global wrote to me at my address of 5 years in October last year, saying I owed them £104 for an old orange contract I had. I stupidly called them to protest that the contract was closed and paid up to date. They said that would look into it? (That was 6 months ago) It prompted me to check my credit report and I discovered that they have registered a default at my old address. I recently wrote to them to dispute the outstanding balance and to ask for the true signed copy of the default notice. 10 days later I received a reply asking for "proof of my new address" they are asking for 2 forms of identification from a long list. They say this is due to the data protection act 1998. I assume, although not stated on the letter they need this before responding to my request? It's seems odd that they require this info as they contacted me at my address of 5 years. I'm just wondering how to reply? Do I supply the identification or apply more pressure to get the defaults removed?

In fairness the default comes of in January but feel this is matter of principle.

Any advice before I bang another letter would be appreciated.

Thanks

Tom

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

Arrow Global wrote to me at my address of 5 years in October last year, saying I owed them £104 for an old orange contract I had. I stupidly called them to protest that the contract was closed and paid up to date. They said that would look into it? (That was 6 months ago) It prompted me to check my credit report and I discovered that they have registered a default at my old address. I recently wrote to them to dispute the outstanding balance and to ask for the true signed copy of the default notice. 10 days later I received a reply asking for "proof of my new address" they are asking for 2 forms of identification from a long list. They say this is due to the data protection act 1998. I assume, although not stated on the letter they need this before responding to my request? It's seems odd that they require this info as they contacted me at my address of 5 years. I'm just wondering how to reply? Do I supply the identification or apply more pressure to get the defaults removed?

In fairness the default comes of in January but feel this is matter of principle.

Any advice before I bang another letter would be appreciated.

Thanks

Tom

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have already written to you current address then they need no more proof.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This my suspicious mind makes me think that their records are out of date or incomplete and they are on a phising trip:fish2:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspected the same thing tbh, I think I'm going to reply saying they have all ready wrote to me at my current address, so won't be supplying the info and insist that they supply the data request or remove the default.

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

?? are there 2 threads running on this

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks cerbs I thought I was seeing double and i have only tee martoonies:!:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All, Just a quick update, I ended up sending these fools proof of my address to get closure and a removal of the default. The accompaning letter was a hybrid between the Prove It letter and and a request for supporting documentation for the orginal issued "default notice". They have responded to say they have no obligation to supply the DN with no mention of proof of the alledged debt. The closing paragraph basically demands payment or else kinda thing, can these idiots read?

 

I have sent one final letter to request proof to the debt in question if they cannot provide this within 7 Days I have demanded that the default be removed from my credit report. I've got a feeling that they are going to reply with a load more c**p, so I think I'll be contacting the ICO. Is there anyone else I can complain to?

 

thanks

 

Tom

Link to post
Share on other sites

OFT and formal complaints to the other parties

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

Just thought I'd update anyone that is interested. On the advise of OFT I sent one final letter to the Arrow Global tewrps, see below:

 

"Dear Sirs

Thank you for your letter dated 21st June 2011.

I now understand that this “Service Agreement” is not regulated under the CCA 1974 so will not be pursuing with my request for a signed copy of the original credit agreement.

However you have failed yet again to provide proof of the alleged debt of £104.00 with Orange (Account Number: ) I will say again, this matter is fully disputed. I will also draw your attention to the CPUTR 2008 and the Office of Fair Trading's Guidance on debt collection(As quoted in previous correspondence), which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question. Judging from the last paragraph in your recent correspondence, it would seem that your company believes it does not need to comply with the CPUTR 2008 guidelines. Any further demands for payment as per your previous letter will be reported to the Office of Fair Trading.

I will ask one final time that you provide proof this debt is still outstanding, if you cannot within the next 7 days could you please remove the default marker logged by Arrow Global with the credit reference agency as is unsubstantiated. If you could be so kind to write and confirm this matter is now closed and that my request has been carried out"

Response received is attached, as you can see these people are totally unprepared to deal with me. Complete utter t***sers. I have now sent a complaint to Tom Alexander Orange CEO/OFT and the ICO. I also BCC Arrow global on the e-mail I sent to Tom at Orange and backed it up with an e-mail to them saying what I'd done and who else I'm going to report them to. No response upto now:wink: Sit and wait I suppose.

Tom

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...