Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

I am starting a mission against Shop Direct all customers please read


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3407 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Madcap,

 

As you predicted Littlewoods have failed to fully comply with my SAR and gone over the 40 day limit. I have sent the first letter, giving them a further 7 days and am now in the process of sending the LBA.

 

Do you know, and could you advise, whether it is better to use either "the part 7 procedure" or the "part 8 procedure" of the small claims procedure, as the template letter used implies part 7, but I feel part 8 should be used.

 

From the ICO site.

 

Part 7 procedure is used when the case is likely to be more complicated because for example there is a dispute about the facts.

 

Part 8 The shorter procedure is called a Part 8 procedure. This procedure will only be used where the claimant is asking the court to make a decision about a question which is unlikely to involve a very great dispute about the facts. An example might be where you have properly made a subject access request, enclosing the correct fee and more than 40 days have passed and you have not received any response. You are, therefore, making an application to court for an order that the data controller answer your subject access request.

 

Regards….Turnaround

 

Part 7 is the preferred route, you would be claiming damages in addition to enforcing disclosure. Part 8 would incur additional filing/service fees and can leave you open to excessive costs if you get it wrong.

 

Gez

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

What are the correct details for the POC regarding Littlewoods catalogue, are they

  • Shop Direct Home Shopping Ltd (Trading As Littlewoods Direct)
  • Shop Direct Finance Company Ltd (Trading As Littlewoods Direct)

 

Regarding the non disclosure of data, the ICO suggest that you name the data controller or the company secretary when sending the LBA – which is it or doesn’t it really matter.

 

Regards…Turnaround

 

Our claim was v SDFCL, no response in our case so we opted for a default judgement as it was worth just over £400.00. Followed it up with a charges reclaim plus restitutional interest. They defended that one but lost :-)

 

Gez

Link to post
Share on other sites

I make it £40.87, primarily because they average 13 compound rest periods annually....... Shop Direct calculate averages at 28 days for accounting rather than monthly so the figures tend to round slightly higher.

 

Gez

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...