Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Orange Default


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4518 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

Last year I opened a contract with Orange but a few months in to it my life got tipped upside down. I have been dragged through a police investigation for a year and a bit and it went to trial and my step dad was found guilty of sexually abusing me and my female cousin.

 

I got signed off work because my depression levels rocketed and I was sent to the mental health unit at my local hospital for an assessment, I was put on some medicines to help me deal with the problems and I am still on them and struggling with life.

 

I could no longer afford the contract so I phoned orange and me and an agent agreed to pay off what I can when I can, he said he will put on my credit file “ Agreement to pay “ and the agreement was not broken but after checking my credit file tonight, there is black D' for months with it and they said they would not do it. I am only 21 and it's burning my credit report. I have accounts with Littlewoods & Jacamo and they are all up to date. I have emailed the CEO office for Orange to ask them to change it to what we agreed. Now I know they have helped me and have been very understandable with my problems but they need to understand from my side that it's not doing any good for my file.

 

I only owe £130 but its taking time to clear off as I am having problems trying to deal with things on my own. I have a councillor now and a tenancy support officer and they said they will help me.

 

Can any thing be done about this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Unfortunately lenders are entitled to report on a debtors payment history. That said lenders are under a duty to treat people with mental health problems with care and consideration but you could argue they have done that with allowing the repayments under arrangement. I think your best chance may be getting your councillor to write and set out the details of your illness but I suspect in the end it wont make a difference I'm afraid.

 

S.

 

Edit: Whilst it may seem harsh to be defaulted, it may help in the end, if you are under an Arrangement to Pay, its reported for 6 years from the last payment made, if defaulted the default falls off after 6 years no matter what.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No letters regarding my credit file, no warnings etc.

 

It was a verbal agreement and it is marked on my file yet they have not done anything about it. I do have copies some where I just need to pull them out or ask them to resend them. Hopefully they will be able to do something about it but I wont hold my breath.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mobile phone providers don't need to send default notices, they are happy to use the best parts for them of the consumer credit agreement but don't use the bits that support the customer - truly disgusting people

 

whilst they dont need a formal default notice, they should as best practice notifiy you prior to marking your credit file with a default. Check out the ICO guidelines.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should but there is no requirement to do this, as somebody who had 2 defaults filed in 2005 from Vodafone (both due for removal this month - yay) and complained to the ICO on the above grounds the ICO response was that mobile phone operators have no obligation to inform you of this as the original contract makes you aware that all info will be shared with reference agencies and does not carry the responsibilities of a regulated CCA

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hello everyone,

 

In July 2010 I was having severe financial problems and I was having problems paying my Orange contract and I ignored it for about 8 weeks and I eventually got a debt collection letter from Orange and there was a number on the letter so instead of calling the agency I called Orange directly instead and I explained everything to them and they were very understanding and they said that I could pay so much a week and for a few months I paid it but then things go even worse for me (Mental Health Wise) and I phoned them again and explained and they said to me that they will pull the file away from the DCA and let me pay off as much as I can and when it's paid off they will close my account.

 

Orange have been brilliant and a year later I managed to get it all paid off and they told me that they will take the default off my credit account and replace all the late payment markers etc to either a Q or another letter so that it did not have an adverse affect on my credit score.

 

Now this is where the problems start, in October of 2011 I received a letter from CapQuest demanding the £137 that was outstanding even though it was cleared off in the summer so I emailed Orange again and they said it was their fault it happened and that they are going to call it back but after checking my credit report today with " Check My File " they have put a default on my report and they shouldn't of done it, it's only on Call Quest, not Experian, Equifax etc

 

This is what it says " The account has been satisfied. The payment status has been reported as in default. "

 

What can I do, I have emailed the Orange credit department telling them of this, I have also emailed CapQuest but I doubt they will reply.

 

Where do I stand legally with this?

 

Any help or advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion it is on that particular

CRA because it uses ''2nd hand'' data

this file is unlikely to be seen by potential

lenders.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...