Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • An update - Still receiving emails and letters - but have been getting text messages too. nothing aggressive just asking me to get in touch.    the text makes it look like it from the bank on first glance - it reads -   'the banks name' would like to dicuss our recent communication...etc... then lists IDR phone number and email FYI - reporting them as spam
    • Hello, After seeing all of the posts about BMW on here I really wish I hadn't even considered them! I bought a used car from them over the weekend, one specifically which had a reversing camera and cruise control in the advert. I was foolish at the time of purchase and didn't check to see these functions work on the test drive (totally my fault). Now that the car is home I've checked and checked and neither of these functions are available. I even checked on Parkers and it seems that no Skoda Kamiq '21 models come with any parking cameras at all. When buying the car, I was told all that was needed was 'Four signatures and £500' to secure it. I was never shown any of the documents, and instead the sales rep opened a box on his iPad and asked me to sign. He had been complaining about the length of time some customers take these days all throughout my time with him. (Again) foolishly I signed. In my email inbox I now have four attachments from BMW, one of which is my signature under a letter which basically says that the cars don't need to match the advertisements online, or have any of the features that a sales rep talks about. I realise that I've made mistakes in not doing my due diligence here, but thought I might as well ask the experts here if I have any rights left to claim that the car was miss-advertised, or if I unknowingly signed them away? Thanks in advance
    • where was this PCN:? please complete: pers i cant see the point in an sar yet await/if they ever send a letter of claim. as long as you've not moved since 2022 you are OK to totally ignore . dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard : Endless BC Saga- Reply help please..


otisan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4759 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is the latest letter I received from BC. It's a new one that I haven't received so far.

However, debt companies have ALL stopped contacting me. After I ask for my CCA request from them, they all stop harassing and pass me on to the next DCA. I don't think there's any left which is why BC have suddenly gotten themselves involved again.

Any ideas what I can reply to this??

 

img340.jpg

 

img341.jpg

 

img342.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter dated 1 Feb as stated in previous letter is:

(There's 2 pages missing, but it's the standard conditions that I've received from them a million times before... Still, nothing with a signature.)

This has been going on for so long now and I have no response to this, any templates left that I might not have used? Or is there a way I can put an end to this a little quicker, because, whilst I was quite confident with what i was doing in the beginning, this has now become such an outdrawn process and I'm am losing confidence/will to carry on with this somewhat..

 

img343.jpg

img344.jpg

img346.jpg

img347.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Otisan,

 

Have a read of the last link in my signature below. It's the OFT Guide on how banks can reply to a CCA request.

 

Recent court decisions mean it is now far harder to dispute a Credit Card debt on the basis of documentation.

 

8-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick132, My wife received exactly the same letter as Otisan received (T&C and without signature / signature box)after 3 months of requesting the True Copy of CCA. On the first post of this thread showing the 1st page of BC statement which states

 

2) There may be omitted from any such copy -

 

(b) Any signature box, signature or date of signature ...

 

Does it mean if the BC have fullfilled their obligation under 1974 cca? even by sending "reconstituted copy" WITHOUT SIGNATURES ?

 

My wife received the same letter T&C from BC in Oct.10 bearing her name and the address (abroad address, NOT the UK address) and my wife again sent a letter to BC asking to send CCA with her Signature. After that never received a letter from BC and then in Jan.11 we were bombarded with calls on mobile and landline from Mercers. My wife never gave her name or dob to them and kept asking to write a letter instead of calls and then hang up phone. Mercers never wrote any letters. From now around 3 weeks calls stopped from Mercers and today received a call from SRJ management and again my wife did not give any info and passed the phone to me, I told the guy he is not paying the bill for my landline and we never gave him the permission to call our landline and in future write a letter instead of phone calls.

 

Would you please explain and enlighten the BC statement i mentioned above. Can the BC and / or debt recovery (SRJ) can take my wife to court or take out CCJ on my wife even without the signatures on the CCA. How can one (debtor) be sure of the True copy of CCA sent without signatures is the same at the time of opening up the account ? Thanks a lot in advance.

Edited by asteroid
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Asteroid,

 

Read the OFT Guide on how a bank should respond to a CCA request at Link No4 in my signature.

 

If they have responded adequately, the a/c is no longer in dispute and they can continue to seek payment.

 

If they want to take court action to collect, then they should produce the original signed credit agreement. If they cannot do this, it's up to the court to decide if the bank has proved their case and done enough to get a CCJ against you.

 

If you want to discuss this further, please use your own thread and I'll get a note to say you've posted there.

 

8-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So would you say they have fulfilled my request?

If so, what would I do next? They have added a lot of interest etc. to the account whilst i thought the account was in dispute but they didn't so it would be a shame to just give up after so long and start paying up, especially with all these added costs.

If legislations have now changed how come every single DCA have abandoned this debt as soon as I send in a letter? The only people left pushing this debt is Barclaycard themselves, after it has been passed several rounds of their DCA's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Otisan,

 

I think they've replied adequately to your CCA Request.

 

I don't see that you can effectively argue about the interest added to the a/c, when it was not in a recognised dispute.

 

A DCA needs paperwork to prove they're entitled to chase the debt. If they don't have the credit agreement, they may choose not to chase again so they can move onto a case that may bring them easier results.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...