Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Is this sufficiant for a letter of claim  ? Letter Of Claim       Reference: Techzone Mobile Phones Samsung A71 Mobile Phone £140 Purchase date 29. 5. 24     I the claimant purchased a 2nd hand Samsung A71 mobile from Techzone Mobile Phone unit 10 of the indoor market at the Potteries shopping centre. Initially the phone worked well until I used the camera and found debris in the camera lens spoiling pictures making it not fit for purpose. I contacted the seller who offered a replacement which I initially accepted but later rejected and wanted a refund in full which the seller refused saying they Do Not give refund is unlawful and goes against the Consumer rights act 2015. Therefore I intend to issue proceedings against you in a county court without further notice unless you reimburse me the above amount in Full within 7 days from the date of this Letter     ------------------------------------------    I think its best if i hand him the letter as posting it might not get through so can claim expenses traveling up there ?   or would it be best to just post and get 'Signed for'  ?   Should i also put in the letter of claim interest added or leave that till the Particulars letter ?
    • Ok thanks, I really need help with my mental health over this I’ve called 111 Hi sorry just one more thing can they contact my workplace?
    • Sorry to shatter your leftie dreams 🤣😂🤣😂     Donald Trump gets a SIX-POINT bump in approval after being found guilty on 34 counts according to snap Daily Mail poll: 'I think it was a waste of taxpayer money' WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK Teflon Don rides again, according to an exclusive poll for DailyMail.com which found that the guilty verdict in Manhattan... James Johnson, who conducted the poll, said Trump might be waking up as convicted felon but he was winning over the voters who matter.   Our snap poll of a representative sample of likely voters shows that for most Americans the trial has not changed their deep-set views of Trump,' he said.  'But amongst those who are open to changing their mind, people feel more positive by a margin of 6 points. That is outside of the margin of the error of the poll and we are saying that is significant. 'It extends to Independent voters too. Look at the explanations and it is clear why: people feel it was a politically motivated trial and view Trump as a "fighter" against what they see as injustice.     
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ?  Civil National Business Centre Northampton NN1 2LH Name of the Claimant ?  PRA Group UK Portfolios LTD   How many defendant's  joint or self ?  Just my self Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.    24th May 2024   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total   Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total)  if your defence filing date falls on a W/End, you must file by friday @4PM     Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  The claimant claims the sum of £22,000 for an outstanding debt owed. On 30/1/18 the defendant entered into n agreement with Lloyds Bank Plc for a bank loan under the reference 10017#######. On 4/1/19 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £22,000. On 30/11/22 the debt of £22,000 assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited, who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group UK Portfolios Ltd on 30/12/23. Notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with S136 Law of property act 1925. The claimant has instructed PRA Group (UK) Limited to act on its behalf in the recovery of the outstanding debt and to pursue litigation on its behalf. AND the claimant claims 1. The sum of £22,000. What is the total value of the claim?  £23,500 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?  Yes Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?  No - N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?  Bank loan When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  No Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ?  I believe it was done online on their app Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  Yes Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  Debt was with halifax, whom passed the debt to PRA Group. Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Yes Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  I'm not completely sure at it was nearly 6 years ago, I have done a CCA request and they have sent a screenshot of their system showing it was sent. Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  Yes Why did you cease payments?  Couldn't afford to make payments. What was the date of your last payment?  August 2018 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?  No
    • It’s all with current lenders and no missed payment to date. so with any reduced payment to them it’s likely to be going to debt collectors at some stage. we jointly own a property together me and my partner 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4701 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

......and now a solicitors letter has arrived asking to pay MBNA £15,000 and I don't know what to do as I'm not in a position to repay this. I could offer minimal repayments but as of yet I havent communicated with them at all.

 

A little back story, my IVA failed as I was made redundant in 2008 and was unable to maintain payments. I've been back in work for almost 9 months and everything is going well. During the time I was unemployed I accrued a large amount of mortgage arrears (balance is approximately £3,800 at the moment) which I am slowly but steadily paying off, this will take approximately another 18 months to clear completely.

 

I work in a profession where bankruptcy would result in not being able to practice so I'm keen to avoid this, however, I'm scared witless that a judge could see that I'm insolvent should the solicitors go for the jugular.

 

The amount owed to all creditors when the IVA failed is in the region of £50k so I may not have many options but keeping my profession and a roof over my head would be preferable.

 

If anyone has any advice on:-

 

1) The best course of action regarding the solicitors letter on behalf of MBNA.

2) My overall situation.

 

I'd be extremely grateful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello again.

 

You have three options:

 

a) complete a personal budget and start to make informal offers to your creditors (usually via pro-rata payments, take a read of my blog)

b) a debt management plan (via one of the free providers, if possible)

c) another IVA

 

at the same time you could also consider seeing if you can reclaim penalty charges, PPI etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was considering another IVA, my worry is that the creditors wouldn't go for it as I failed the last one.

 

I know its another 5 years of my life but at least its 'managed' and I can keep all debts everything in one place.

 

Has anyone experience of a second IVA after the first one failed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen a few go through OK. You're correct that the creditors may be more reluctant to agree this time around but it's not impossible.

 

As far as the solicitor's firm is concerned, they actually have no further powers to do anything than the original creditor had.

 

Is there much equity in the property?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your nominee for the IVA values the property on a forced-sale basis, with what you mention re possible negative equity, an IVA would give a better result to creditors rather than bankruptcy, and a well constructed information pack to be sent to the creditors for the MOC to consider the proposal would illustrate this clearly and 'sell' the idea to the creditors.

 

If there is negative or very little equity in the property, by the time this was sold and the trustee in bankruptcy / OR fees were paid out from any estate, the amount to be paid in a dividend would probably be far lower than that of an IVA. In the reasoning behind the IVA, it should clearly be noted that the first IVA failed due to redundancy and not just not paying

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

You have three options:

 

a) complete a personal budget and start to make informal offers to your creditors (usually via pro-rata payments, take a read of my blog)

b) a debt management plan (via one of the free providers, if possible)

c) another IVA

 

at the same time you could also consider seeing if you can reclaim penalty charges, PPI etc?

 

Hi sequenci, Wouldnt it be a option to check on if solicitors have a agreement for this debt (CCA) as another option?

 

Wouldn't it also be worth Jopea checking when last payments where made to this debt either directly or from the Insolvency Practioner as Jopea may not have made enough payments that left anything over to pay creditors once IP took there payment?

 

Not challenging anything you said mate just running a few ideas that may help :wink:

Advice & opinions given by Stinkyfeet are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not challenging anything you said mate just running a few ideas that may help :wink:

 

No worries! The CCA route is another option, I guess it's down to the OP and whether they would like a potentially long and drawn out battle via the courts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries! The CCA route is another option, I guess it's down to the OP and whether they would like a potentially long and drawn out battle via the courts.

 

Was more thinking about the CCA route as being a delay to them while OP checks when they received last payment on this debt as could be a case that it not got long left if for example no payment been received by them in say 5 years.

 

Many thanks matey

Advice & opinions given by Stinkyfeet are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was more thinking about the CCA route as being a delay to them while OP checks when they received last payment on this debt as could be a case that it not got long left if for example no payment been received by them in say 5 years.

 

Many thanks matey

 

v.good point :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all for the recent replies.

 

I think I will go down the CCA route as well whilst I collect my thoughts on everything. I'd love it to all go away instead of another 5 years at £360 a month but I can't risk losing the house.

 

I've some serious thinking to do, its definitely playing on my mind a lot at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see two problems here,

 

1. the last pament would have been 2008 since the OP was paying an IVA

 

2. The OP has accepted in a court document when entering the IVA that the debts were valid, in those circumstance im not certain that they would even need the original agreements

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see two problems here,

 

1. the last pament would have been 2008 since the OP was paying an IVA

 

2. The OP has accepted in a court document when entering the IVA that the debts were valid, in those circumstance im not certain that they would even need the original agreements

 

Know what you saying mate but my sister was in exactly the same boat as OP, I advised her that since she had been in a IVA in theory the debts would have been accepted, her thoughts where what did she have to lose.

 

It proved me wrong as the 4 of the 9 creditors who did make contact, never ever said anything about the IVA etc etc and either ignored the CCA request and one said they hadn't got agreement and mentioned nothing further.

 

As the OP is trying to avoid the Bankrupt route because of his job, therefore I posted as believe that it is a option for him / her to pursue, and as they say, nothing ventured nothing gained. He or she may hit a wall, but surely its worth burning this bridge.

 

As you stated, the OP was paying into a IVA, but so was my sister, but as the Insolvency Practioner running the IVA's fee came first and payments she had made into the IVA arrangement merely covered that, the creditors got ziltch. Therefore, a check on last payment definatly worth looking into.

 

Obvously, this wouldn't apply to all, if someone had been in a IVA for 3 years and made 3 years of payments, then there definately a high chance that the creditors did get a payment. A quick check on the credit files would confirm this.

Advice & opinions given by Stinkyfeet are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original credit agreements werre signed between 2001 & 2004. The IVA was set up in 2005 and there were no payments after Jan 2008.

 

I was wondering about the need for the originals with the IVA, it sorta supercedes it.

 

Just noticed your reply about IVA payments and well pointed by Debtinfo.

 

I still think I would try this avenue, honestly, it could come to a dead end, however, it may not.

 

Did you actually go to court on IVA date or did IP deal with this?

Advice & opinions given by Stinkyfeet are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never went to court, was all dealt with by my IVA provider.

 

Thanks for the update. Can you get a copy of credit reports to see when last payment was made?

Advice & opinions given by Stinkyfeet are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask why the Supervisor of your failed IVA after two years did not petition for your Bankruptcy. Is this the standard condition in an IVA........

 

You can ask but I don't have any answers. I just received a letter stating that the IVA failed and a statement of payments and deductions.

 

Anyway, I received another letter from the Solicitors today with more threats so I think I'll send a CCA request tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...