Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Welcome to the National Consumer Service Buying any goods or any services??? A used car? - Paying by cash or bank transfer??? - BIG Fail!Share the love – Tell a friend about the Consumer Action Group - your National Consumer ServiceAre you buying a used car...? Protect yourself – read our used car guideESSENTIAL:: Read our Customer Services Guide!!!Twitter - Why you should open a Twitter account ESSENTIAL:: Read our Customer Services Guide!!!Have we helped you today...? Please help the CAG Had a car accident? Been offered a courtesy car?Follow @Real_CAG Parcel Delivery Insurance is Unlawful - The TimesWhy don't you change your profile picture?? Problem with utilities company or phone/broadband? Begin by sending a statutory request for your personal data. It’s free    Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.× Financial Legal Issues Complete My Profile Dismiss Next Step: Profile Photo (Profile Photo and Cover Photo) Your profile is 0% complete! Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why… The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini' Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.  You have received a Court Claim ISSUED IN ENGLAND & WALES What you need to do Rate this topic By citizenB March 4, 2014 in Financial Legal Issues style="text-align: center;">     Thread Locked because no one has posted on it for the last 3638 days. If you need to add something to this thread then   Please click the "Report " link   at the bottom of one of the posts.   If you want to post a new story then Please Start your own new thread That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help    Thanks   citizenB Posted March 4, 2014 #1   The questionnaires below provide important information which will allow us to help you. In order to use them, you will have to copy them into your own post and then give us the answers – preferably in red below each question. You can start by overwriting the prompt: "Give answer here" below each question – and your responses should automatically appear in red   Thank you +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++   You have received a claim form.   firstly - read all the posts in this thread FIRST...   then copy this first msg to your thread - and put your answer after each question   In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us]     Which Court have you received the claim from ? Name County Court   MCOL Northampton N1 ? Manual Claim CCMCC (Salford) ? New beta WWW.MONEYCLAIMS.SERVICE.GOV.UK ?   If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. (not the response page or AOS)     Name of the Claimant ? Give answer here   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Give answer here   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. Give answer here   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total   Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total)  if your defence filing date falls on a W/End, you must file by friday @4PM     Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please type out their particulars of claim in full (verbatim) less any identifiable data and round the amounts up/down. state how many digits the account number has.. Give answer here   What is the total value of the claim? Give answer here   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Give answer here   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? Give answer here   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? Give answer here Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Give answer here   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? Give answer here   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Give answer here   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Give answer here   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Give answer here   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Give answer here   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Give answer here   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Give answer here   Why did you cease payments? Give answer here   What was the date of your last payment? Give answer here   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Give answer here   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Give answer here   What you need to do now.   Answer the questions above   If you have not already done so – send a CCA request to the claimant for a copy of your agreement (If Applicable) (except for Overdraft/ Mobile/Telephone accounts)   Send a CPR31.14 request to the solicitor named on the claim form for copies of documents mentioned/implied within the claim form. There are two different versions - one for Loans/Credit cards the other for Current accounts   Request 1 - Loans/Credit Cards     Request 2 - Current Accounts     You may use a CPR part 18 request for any other information (not request documents) that you might require in order to defend yourself. Please note that CPR 18 is specifically for Fast Track claims and although technically the claim has yet to be allocated to a track the claimant may refuse to comply for this reason.   If you require CPR Part 18 - this will need to be drafted specifically.   If you are not planning on defending for one reason or another – then you will need to complete an Income and Expenditure form and contact the Solicitor with your proposal. The N9a is already enclosed in the claim pack for Admittance which should be sent to the solicitor named on the claim form   If you are considering making a partial admittance N9b must be completed and returned to the court. Please note in most cases a partial admittance will result in an automatic CCJ for the amount admitted.   You have received a Claim - What you need to do.pdf1.33 MB · 242 downloads     Before Printing the PDF TIP   If you DO NOT wish to print Page 1 (Cover Page) of the PDF, please ensure to do the following:   Ensure you go to your Printer Settings and set it to 'Print from Page 2' (this way Page 1 (Cover Page) should not print out).   Note: This will save you Ink & Paper     Bookmark   Report 3 weeks later...   AndyOrch Posted March 20, 2014 #2   Once you receive a Court Summons N1   As a defendant in a small claims case it is important that you act quickly and do not ignore the claim form when it arrives. Remember, the claim will proceed anyway even if you don’t respond. If the claim goes against you, it will be very difficult to make a counter claim as you didn’t respond to the initial small claim.   You may be unaware that you are the defendant in a small claims case that a Creditor has bought against you. When the small claims form arrives follow these initial steps:   1: Read the Form Carefully   The detail about the claim that is being bought against you will be in the ‘particulars of claim’ section. If this section isn't completed, or has the words ‘particulars of claim to follow’ take no action now and wait until you are sent details of the claim against you. You may want to consult a lawyer at this stage.   2: Respond in Time   It’s vitally important that you respond to the claim for you have been sent. Remember that there is a 19 day (5 +14) time limit on this to acknowledge the claim.You must submit before the 19 days are up, so post your response with plenty of time.If your intention is to defend the claim in full you get a further 14 days to submit your response ...so 33 days in total.   3: Talk to the Claimant   Just because a small claim has been bought against you and a claim form issued, this doesn’t mean you are not allowed to contact the claimant directly. In fact the court encourages you to try and settle the claim without the need for a court appearance. So, try and resolve your dispute directly with the claimant if you can.   Not Responding to a Small Claim   If you ignore the small claims form when it arrives this can have an adverse impact on your financial status. The court will continue with the small claims lawsuit that is being bought against you even in your absence as this is a legal requirement. When the small claim is processed you will be sent a bill showing the amount you owe and any additional costs. The small claims against you is a legal process that will be recorded on the Register of Judgements, Orders and Fines. This information is used to check your credit, so could have a negative impact when you next apply for any credit. To avoid damaging your credit rating reply to your small claims docket as soon as you can.   How to Respond to Your Small Claims Form   When you received your form from the court you will also have been sent a response pack. In this pack you will see the option that are open to you. These include:   • A dispute claim form. You can use this form if you do not agree that you are liable for the small claim being bought against you and wish to submit a Defence. • Details about how to pay the amount being claimed from you. • Details about how to admit to part of the small claim against you, and how you can ask the claimant for more time to pay.   There are Two Types of Small Claims:   Fixed Amounts:   If the claim against you is for a fixed amount of money your response pack will contain three forms. Form N9 (acknowledgement of Service), form N9A (admission form) and N9B (defence and counterclaim form).   Unspecified Amounts:   If the amount being claimed is unspecified you will be sent forms N9 and N9C (admission form) and N9D (defence and counterclaim form). It is vital that you read the accompanying explanatory notes before choosing which form to send back.   Paying the Small Claim   If you want to make full payment of the amount being claimed against you this amount will be shown on the claim for you have been sent, and will also have details about where to send the money. Don’t forget, this must be done within the 14 day time limit or your case will proceed to the next stage.   In some instances you would like to pay, but need more time, you can give details about the delay you would like on form N9A, which should be in your response pack. It’s also a good idea to read leaflet EX309: The Defendant Admits by claim as this gives more details on this aspect of your case when fixed amounts of money are involved. Leaflet EX308 gives details of cases when unspecified amounts are being claimed against you.   Also please read forms EX326 and EX160A   How to Defend a Claim Against You   Disputed claims are handled by filling in the appropriate form from your response pack. You have three choices: Form N9, N9B or N9D. Read the note accompanying each form carefully to ensure you completely correctly. Pay special attention to the allegations raised on the form. If you don’t respond to each the court will assume you are admitting guilt. Edited April 10, 2014 by stu007 Updated PDF added    1   Bookmark   Report 2 months later...   citizenB   Posted June 5, 2014 #3   PLEASE NOTE - WARNING   Once you have received your claim form - the Court timetable comes into force. Not that of the creditor or claimant. If you have requested information with them after the claim has been issued - or have entered into discussion with them and they say something like "We will put this on hold for a period of time". You cannot and must not ignore the timetable from the court.   This thread should serve as an example   http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?416202&p=4547677#post4547677   The OP in the case above was in communication with the CAG Vodafone rep. A claim was issued during this time. The Rep in good faith said he would ask the Claimant to put things on hold.... they did not.. the OP ignored advice from caggers to continue with the court timetable and did not submit a defence. The claimaint obtained a Judgment by default. Edited June 5, 2014 by citizenB     Bookmark   Report 3 yr AndyOrch changed the title to You have received a Court Claim ISSUED IN ENGLAND & WALES What you need to do   style="text-align: center;">     Thread Locked because no one has posted on it for the last 3638 days. If you need to add something to this thread then   Please click the "Report " link   at the bottom of one of the posts.   If you want to post a new story then Please Start your own new thread That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help    Thanks  This topic is now closed to further replies.  Share Follow3 Go to topic listing Next unread topic Recently Browsing   1 Cagger hugo1963 1,380 Members Viewed hugo1963 4 minutes ago   lolerz 4 hours ago   vicr76 8 hours ago   Moomoo11 Friday at 18:18   London1971 Friday at 11:26   AndyOrch Friday at 11:13   mollie5549 Thursday at 17:21   zyghom Thursday at 13:26   Magnusinfinity May 15   Newdogg06 May 14   Unique May 13   saberguy May 12   Mycathasfleas May 12   WantJustice May 9   Rain clouds May 8   MoltoModerato May 3   George2024 May 1   Badtimes123 April 30   LouLouDev79 April 29   northmonk April 29   mowbli April 29   WornOut55 April 27   paulhn757 April 24   UsedCarMan April 23   robertobaggio April 23   marksheff April 20   anotheruser0000 April 19   TT98 April 18   gatoradeqaz April 17   Murielme2 April 15   Frontera mixup April 11   BreadAndButter April 9   Karalius April 9   nurjeon03 April 9   Penglings April 8   Nick April 8   Edals April 5   thesixco April 1   lifttheveil March 30   dx100uk March 30   Stripeycat March 28   jon8214 March 27   sharkieuk March 25   HappyHolidays March 24   sandokan March 22   SimplyBeyondWords March 22   supernick90 March 20   iyam71 March 20   Nicky Boy March 18   StoryBoard March 18   Myth_007 March 15   kaze March 12   RodeMan March 8   eskimo123 March 7   JEDIKNIGHTS March 6   persha50 March 6   tobzas March 6   lancashirelad93 March 6   HappyDay2222 March 3   1penny March 3   nat8808 March 2   FTMDave March 1   lynzmeek February 25   Mike Mechanic February 25   Ethel Street February 24   Outoftoon February 23   anna may February 22   PJB5 February 22   iamgnome February 21   SweetCaroline February 20   EdinburghDude February 19   Grgw44 February 18   linbren03 February 15   whittymags February 9   flembo45 February 7   comebackjimmy February 6   MontyIsInnocent February 4   libra007 February 1   Eamonn77 January 31   xtonehari January 30   hlh49421 January 30   ceeferace January 29   catscratch January 29   Melbel January 25   Suggababe January 19   yorkshire_lufc January 17   ljrobinson69 January 16   makkyinuk January 15   yogii January 14   MadMat January 12   rocky_sharma January 4   mrskippy21 January 3   lookinforinfo December 29, 2023   europa16 December 28, 2023   MrsSl December 27, 2023   KP44UK December 23, 2023   Montego December 22, 2023   Worazz December 21, 2023   StopTheBullies December 21, 2023   hitman126 December 20, 2023   +1280 More   Have we helped you ...?                     Contact Us   Cookies Copyright Reclaim the Right Ltd - reg: 05783665Powered by Invision Community IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.  
    • ITV News have got hold of an email and recording of a phone call between Vennells and Ron Warmington of Second Sight. People in the know are saying it's smoking gun everyone's been looking for. I love that this has come out the day before she appears at the inquiry. This should be interesting under oath. Paula Vennells' 'smoking gun' email reveals Post Office 'cover-up' | ITV News WWW.ITV.COM ITV News has acquired an email and recording of a phone call that suggests the former Post Office boss was aware of issues with the Horizon system...  
    • I think you may as well take the opportunity in your letter to tell them that if they won't take responsibility for it then you will see quotations for the repair, provide copies of the quotations to them and then proceed with your own repair and recover the money back from them in the courts if necessary. Separately, can I ask you whether this is the car that you then bought unseen and at some distance from you? Has it come with an MOT and if so what date was the MOT and who gave it the MOT? Have you read our used car guide
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4843 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is a follow on from "the bailiffs have broken into my back garden". sorry its such a long thread....

 

my depression has got so bad now, mostly because of this, that I'm now seeing a psychotherapist - so I can at least talk to someone - she phoned a lawyer and he said that Councils can often "negotiate" how much they will accept to return to my car (apparently, a bit like the "poll tax" - i wasn't very aware when that mallarky was going on ) -

 

It is quite clear from my correspondence with Waverley that he simply WILL NOT address the issue of costs - every time I ask him about costs he continues to FAIL to address the EXACT amount. This is evident in 2 letters he has written to me ... he simply says "... and bailiffs costs ...". he knows that the costs are disproportionate to the amount owed but he just detracts from answering the question. He keeps going on about me applying to the court for the costs to be taxed. He simply fails to "get a grip" on the fact that Waverley have instructed the bailiffs and the bailiffs are acting as agents for Waverley so, ultimately, it surely must be Waverley who decides what costs can be adminsitered.?????

 

Currently, as per my psycho, I asked Waverley what was the minimum amount they required and they simply said get in touch with the bailiffs b....... well, I attach all the emails going to and fro....

 

My question is, shall I apply t the court for a summons as previously suggested so I can show how the bailiffs have acted uneasonably (incidentally, my landlord has noticed the back gate has a huge chunk missing...... I obviously pleaded ignorance...and the neighbours have informed her that "dodgy" people have been round..... I've now been served notice to quit etc.,etc.,) or what on earth shall I do?

 

.ExternalClass .ecxhmmessage P{padding:0px;}.ExternalC lass body.ecxhmmessage{font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma;}

Alexander's bailiffs

 

please see copy correspondence.

 

How much do you "legally" require to return my car - my children are not at school, I am not at work nor am I at college and I would pleased if we could resolve this matter so my family can return to normal.

 

 

To:

Subject: RE: Council tax account: 12449105

From: [email protected]. uk

Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:01:57 +0000

 

Dear

 

Thanks for your e-mail.

 

I suggest you contact Alexander's for the exact amount required as Waverley does not necessarily know all of the charges that are being accrued. I suggest you contact the bailiff's office on [email protected] o.uk or telephone 0208 661 2515 between 10.00 am and 4.00 pm.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Simon Piper

Principal Revenues Officer

 

Direct line: 01483 523104

 

 

 

From: r

To:

Date: 07/02/2011 15:18

Subject: RE: Council tax account: 12449105

 

 

 

Dear Mr Piper

 

Can you please tell me what is the minimum amount you require to return my car.

 

Thank you

R

 

To:

Subject: RE: Council tax account: 12449105

From: [email protected]. uk

Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:42:31 +0000

Dear

Thank you for your e-mails dated 2 February.

As you are aware, your payment of £251.69 has been credited to the enforcement's fees in accordance with regulation 52(4) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992.

The liability order granted to the Council on 22 July 2010 is in the sum of £354.69. The bailiff has been instructed to enforce payment of the unpaid liability order and the enforcement charges, hence the removal of your motor car and its impending sale at auctionlink3.gif unless the outstanding debt is paid in full.

Schedule 5 of the regulations does not comment on the total level of fees that may be incurred by a debtor when a liability order is enforced. A number of the fees are a percentage of the sum owing or fixed sums while the charges for a bailiff attending are required to be reasonable. If you wish to challenge the fees you may apply at your own expense to have them taxed in the county courtlink3.gif.

You will note from regulation 45 (1) that the costs incurred in enforcing a liability order may be recovered by distress and the sale of goods. If you are aggrieved by the levy you may appeal to the Magistrates ' Court at your own expense under regulation 46. There is no requirement for the bailiff to separate the enforcement charges and pursue them through the County Court.

Yours sincerely

Simon Piper

Principal Revenues Officer

 

Direct line: 01483 523104

 

 

From:

To:

Date: 02/02/2011 12:04

Subject: RE: Council tax account: 12449105

 

 

Dear Mr Piper

 

Your bailiff contiues to come to the property pursuing the amount of £866.19 even though the council tax of £251.69 has been paid. They are obviously acting on your instruction and as you will know that under Regulation 45 Schedule 5 of the Council Tax Administration and Enforcement Regulations do not allow for fees of this amount. You are fully responsible for the bailiff's actions. You will be aware that he cannot use a Liability Order to pursue me for costs and it is he who must make an application through the small claims court for these fees.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Please note that all correspondence is being copied in to Mary Orton, Director of Waverley

 

To:

Subject: Council tax account: 12449105

From: [email protected]. uk

Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:37:34 +0000

 

Dear Ms S

 

Thank you for your letter dated 24 January received today in reply to my letter dated 15 December 2010.

 

I note that you have made arrangements to pay Waverley £251.69. This is not accepted as full and final settlement of the debt owing to the Council as it does not satisfy the amounts due in law from you. In accordance with The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 the payment, when received, will be credited to the costs and charges first. Assuming your payment of £251.69 is received the balance of £103.00 will remain unpaid, in addition to the bailiff's fees.

 

The bailiff's fees have been incurred as a consequence of your not paying the council tax owing to Waverley and I explained in my letter dated 15 December the actions taken by Waverley prior to the bailiff attending. If you wish to challenge the level of the bailiff's fees you may apply to have them taxed by the county court.

 

In the meantime I expect the bailiff to continue to enforce the liability order dated 22 July 2010. I urge you to settle the debt in full with the bailiff immediately in order to prevent the bailiff's fees increasing further.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Simon Piper

Principal Revenues Officer

 

Direct line: 01483 523104

We are passionate about improving lives, leisure, environment, value for money and subsidised affordable housing.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the reply I've just got back from Alexanders bailiffs which completely ignores my earlier email asking them for a figure to return my car! Is ther nothing I can do?

 

Dear Ms Stewart

 

I am writing regarding the vehicle EU02 LCP Renault Megane, which our bailiff Mr T Cooper had removed. It is now with the Auctioneers and will be sold in the next auction as a non runner, as it does not have the keys or log book with it. This will result in a low sale price. However, if you send us the keys and the log book, the vehicle will sell for considerably more. Thus reducing your debt further with Waverley Borough Council and ourselves. Clearly getting the best price for the vehicle would be to your advantage.

 

If you would like to discuss the matter further, please do not hesitate to contact our office on 020 8661 2515 between the hours of 10am - 4pm .

 

 

Kind Regards

 

Deborah Harding

Administrator

 

Contact telephone number

020 8661 2122

9am - 5pm

 

Alexander's Commercial Services Limited

Company Reg. No 3498683, UK

Reg. Office: 75 Park Lane, Croydon CR9 1XS

Link to post
Share on other sites

RH - Lets go back to the beginning and work out the legitimate fees for them, as they are clearly (typically) incapable.

 

Please read this carefully and correct me where i am wrong.

 

I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt that they called once and you were not in - we can clear up the details latter with a 'screen shot' their record of what has happened.

 

So...

 

Origional sum = £354.69

 

First visit no levy (maybe) =£24.50

Second visit (levy) =£34.68

Removal of car =£300.00 max

 

 

Total possible =£713.87 + possible storage fees etc, i'll have a look into it.

 

 

How much have you paid them so far?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct me where i'm wrong.....

 

So despite the fact that the CURRENT maximum total is £713.87 AFTER visit, levy and removal, it seems:

 

You 'owed' £700 in December - have you a written demand / e-mail for this?

 

By Jan 25th it had risen to £866-19 PRIOR to the removal of your car? Again, have you a written dated demand / e-mail for this?

 

Think carefully, is this correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

RH - Lets go back to the beginning and work out the legitimate fees for them, as they are clearly (typically) incapable.

 

Please read this carefully and correct me where i am wrong.

 

I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt that they called once and you were not in - we can clear up the details latter with a 'screen shot' their record of what has happened.

 

So...

 

Original sum = £354.69

 

First visit no levy (maybe) =£24.50

Second visit (levy) =£34.68

Removal of car =£300.00 max

 

 

Total possible =£713.87 + possible storage fees etc, i'll have a look into it.

 

 

How much have you paid them so far?

 

Was going to ask the same thing myself in a different way

 

liability order £354.69

1st & 2nd visit fees £24.50

levy fee £35

 

Total outstanding at date of the levy £414.19

can you tell me what date/ amounts are written on the notice of seizure

can you tell me if you have had any bailiff letters before the levy and what date/ amount is on it

can you tell me if there were any bailiffs letter after the levy (but before removal) the date /amounts on it

can you tell me if there any bailiffs letter /paperwork (looking for a removal form) when the car was removed and the date/ amounts of it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Original summons (I presume its the LO) £351.69.

First visit £24.50 (with the intention to levy but NO levy)

I pay the entire council tax bill of £251.69

This leaves £100 out standing on LO.

Then, 2nd visit - car clamped (or so they thought)

Then 3rd visit - removal of car - £300 max (you say)

The current maximum according to their notice now stands at £864.50, this does not take into account levying the car, nor storage (which I believe can only be £2.50 per day according to CAB)

I do not have a written demand for this but I do have it in writing, somewhere

yes, by 25th Jan it had risen to £866 PRIOR to the removal of my car - I don't have a written demand but I do have it in writing, right beside me dated 2nd Feb.

 

Alexanders have just emailed me a response which now follows and I have asked them if this includes the £251.69 already paid:

 

.ExternalClass .ecxhmmessage P{padding:0px;}.ExternalClass body.ecxhmmessage{font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma;}Dear Ms

 

Thank you for your email.

 

Please be informed that to release your vehicle, we require the full outstanding balance, which is £864.50 plus £15 per day storage costs. If paid today, then the total needed will be £954.50.

 

If you need any further information, do not hesitate to contact our office.

 

 

 

Kind Regards

 

Deborah Harding

Administrator

 

Contact telephone number

020 8661 2122

9am - 5pm

 

Alexander's Commercial Services Limited

Company Reg. No 3498683, UK

Reg. Office: 75 Park Lane, Croydon CR9 1XS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have any money until m y tax credits come through and that will only be £200 adn we will have to go without groceries. the only other alternative is not to pay the rent at the end of month - my car isn't worth £1000 or more even with the keys and log book - it really is an old banger.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, I've got my paperwork.

 

03 Nov 2010 - "Notice Not to Move" from Alexanders (signed by non certified bailiff called Mr O'Neil) saying this vehicle is now seized AND "Notie of Seizure of Goods and Inventory" also dated 3rd Nov (stating the LO costs; costs of 1st attendance as £25.00; levy fee £35.00 ; Enforcement costs £270 - total due if paid immediately £696.19)

15 Dec 2010 - letter Waverley BC to me with breakdown of council tax and LO - £354.69

24 Jan - i wrote to council questioning disproportionate costs

25 Jan - Notice of bailiffs attendance - amount now £866.19

25 jan another notice of bailiffs attendance including costs £170 - car now clamped (or so they thought)

25 jan I move car

30 jan - council tax left my bank account - £251.69

2 feb Alexanders came back and found my car, towed it and left a notice saying "pursuant to the above order, the items listed below have today been seized and will be sold by public auction unless full payment including costs are paid by 7th Feb.

2 feb - Alexanders put thru letterbox a Notice of bailiffs attendance with an amount of £866.19 - Mr T Cooper

8 feb - Alexanders want £ 954.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, I['ve paid £251.69 already.

 

Here's the response frm Alexanders:

Thank you for your email.

 

Please be informed that to release your vehicle, we require the full outstanding balance, which is £864.50 plus £15 per day storage costs. If paid today, then the total needed will be £954.50.

 

If you need any further information, do not hesitate to contact our office.

 

Kind Regards

 

Deborah Harding

Administrator

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ministry of Justice Public Register of bailiffslink3.gif on 020 3334 6355 phone this number now and confirm he is not a certificated bailiff

 

03 Nov 2010 - "Notice Not to Move" from Alexanders (signed by non certified bailiff called Mr O'Neil) saying this

Link to post
Share on other sites

This one goes against the grain but as a last resort......

 

Since the likely hood of resolving this prior to the car being auctioned is between slim and nil, is the best outcome for reallyhardup that she:

 

1) Gives the keys and log book to Alexanders,

 

2) The car goes for more at auction

 

3) Recover what we can after the fact.

 

But first, i think a third party needs to contact Alexanders and Mr Piper letting them know that we know the facts. No offence, but because they've got got her flustered, they think RHU is a soft target, and that she will not follow through with legal action after this debacle is over.

 

We need to convince them otherwise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just made the phone call and they say that there is a Mr Jean-Darren O'Neill (who also goes by the name of John). When he visited my property HE WAS NOT REGISTERED.

His registration ran from 16th November. So, when he visited my home on 3rd November, HE WAS NOT REGISTERED. Further, his registration ran from 17 Oct 2007 until 16 Oct 2009 (because its renewed every 2 years) and renewed on 16th Nov 2010.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a phone call on m y mobile from Alexanders from Debbie. She says they are having difficulties with their emailing system!!!! and that the amount of £954.50 DOES include the £251.69 I've already paid - what an utter rip off!! the removal fees were £250 she also says.

Time and Date noted.

Recording kept for possible future reference.

Edited by reallyhardup
missed a bit
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just made the phone call and they say that there is a Mr Jean-Darren O'Neill (who also goes by the name of John). When he visited my property HE WAS NOT REGISTERED.

His registration ran from 16th November. So, when he visited my home on 3rd November, HE WAS NOT REGISTERED. Further, his registration ran from 17 Oct 2007 until 16 Oct 2009 (because its renewed every 2 years) and renewed on 16th Nov 2010.

 

Phone croydon court (don't know the number) and ask for the date he applied to renew his certificate

I have a very bad feeling that as long as they have applied for the renewal they are OK

 

Its ok though I'm going to try another angle with a nicely worded letter to the leader of the council

Link to post
Share on other sites

So is there a glimmer of hope we can 're-set' the total due to to £414.19 - £251.69 = £162.50 Due.

 

Grounds to challenge some of the fees over and above the £414.19 (and possibly the levy fee itself:

 

1)The bailiff who carried out the levy was not certified at the time of the levy.

 

2)The levy was made to extort an unlawful "enforcement cost" of £270 over and above the legitimate fees. This unlawful enforcement cost made it impossible for the debtor to clear the balance prior to removal.

 

 

Must get to work now RHU, but return latter or tomorrow.(or sooner if curiosity overcomes the need to work!!)

 

I think we need to get this letter drafted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...