Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Barclaycard/Mercers next step...


FredF
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4856 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry Fred

 

I wasn't clear: replace "I wish to make a formal complaint to Barclaycard" with "This is a formal complaint" and head the letter: FORMAL COMPLAINT; otherwise the jokers will ignore it. Send it recorded etc etc The rest is fine.

 

x

 

v

 

Ah, okay, thanks vic. I'll do that. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've changed some of the wording:

 

With reference to the letter I recently received from Mercers, who are acting as Barclaycard’s agent, with the above reference regarding my twice made offer of a £1 payment being refused.

 

This is a formal complaint to Barclaycard for the unfair treatment of my account, by your agent, in respect to my offer and would like to draw your attention to the recent Office of Fair Trading Vs MBNA ruling with regards to consumers in financial difficulties offering token payments.

 

I would like to ask you once again to accept my £1 offer, I’m more than happy to setup a standing order for that amount. I would also ask again that you freeze all interest and charges to enable me to make some impact against this debt.

 

I look forward to your response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fred

 

Your complaint is against Bcard; Mercers are merely agents of Bcard and Bcard are accountable for Mercers' actions.

 

So it's a formal complaint to Bcard for their refusal to accept an affordable offer.

 

And it's a formal complaint to Bcard about the harassment bytheir agent.

 

Do not get sidetracked about Mercers, they are a red herring deliberately put there to confuse you.

 

You is you; the enemy is Bcard.

 

x

 

v

Edited by victoria_siempre
grammar
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but the yanks also believe that Obama is the 44th president, when he's not, he's the 43rd.

 

And yes it was a compliment

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes getting side tracked again. Although most Yanks believe it means they have had 44 different people.

 

Getting back on to subject. The letters good, lets see what it brings back from the OC

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update, my complaint letter was signed for on Monday, so I'm still waiting for a response from Barclaycard themselves. However, Mercers began phoning me on Sunday morning, in fact twice on Sunday morning (landline & mobile) and then twice Sunday lunchtime.

 

They've rung me each morning at 8am sharp this week, this morning I answered, and after refusing once again to go through security and insisting I will only correspond in writing, the girl on the phone said 'we'll never write to you'. I asked why and she said 'we will only talk to you direct on the phone, and we will continue to phone until you do'.

 

I'm going to send them the telephone harassment letter today, but can't imagine it'll make any difference. If they continue to call after that, I'll make an official complaint to the OFT and give them everything so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will soon change their mind when you make your complaints and send the letter. Also ask for a copy of their complaints procedure.

 

Lots of people purchase a device which screens their calls and never get a call centre directly through again, costs approx £99 if you can afford it.

 

They will soon get ****ed off not being able to talk to.

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys I just want to say thanks again for your help with this problem, I received a letter this morning from BC confirming that they will call off the dogs, freeze the interest and charges and now accept my offer. They even sent me a standing order form to help me out (though I did double check it wasn't a direct debit mandate in disguise). I'm going to set that up and leave it a month before I start the process of claiming back my PPI.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After sending in my letter of complaint with a covering letter, to customer services, Mercers and the Barclays Group Chairman, I had a phone call from their Head Office and a further call, after they had investigated, though not upholding the complaint ( no surprise there as they investigated themselves! ) at least putting interest and charges on hold. I said though that I had consulted a debt advisor who advised me that my food etc amount budgeted for was far too low, and that therefore I could afford £1 only per month, technically not able to afford even this. What a struggle though....

 

They have yet to send me a copy of my signed agreement with them, waiting on this with bated breath!

 

Re: OFT, don't bother with them, they only deal with other matters. Correct procedure eg with telephone harassment is to go to Citizens Advice, AND write direct to the Financial Ombudsman. Inform Barclaycard of these, and make a formal written complaint to Barclaycard as the Financial Ombudsman will write back to you and await Barclaycard's response to the formal complaint before dealing with your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman, but you might get an accelerated and more sympathetic response from Barclaycard in the meantime!

 

Barclays Head Office have said they will implement call monitoring for Mercers, so you might get a message saying the call is being recorded by them. Whether this will take any sting off their tactics, only time will tell. DO write down the times and dates of all calls from Customer services, Mercers or Alders, as being harassed by them might stand in your favour if it ends up in county court.

Edited by chazzo125
addition
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...