Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Leaving a new job and contracts


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4885 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Two weeks ago, I started a new job. I have been very unhappy and the work conditions were not what I was led to believe. In fact, it so turned out that people join this office only to leave quite soon for so intolerable are the matters.

I would like to submit my resignation as soon as possible. Is this possible? Should I personally submit it or can it be done by postal mail? I'd appreciate your thoughts.

But please note the following:

- I haven’t yet signed the contract (dated the day on which I joined)

- The contract mentions that those in probationary period should give a notice of 1 month, but I want to leave immediately

- I had ordered supplies for my office, some of which were delivered and some won’t be.

Thankyou

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot resign with immediate effect - not signing your contract is irrelevant, and you are, like the employer, bound by its terms. If you do so then there are risks involved. Whilst those risks are not commonplace - they happen often enough to be well worth noting. If you then take the risk - on your own head be it.

 

Those pesky contractual rights that employees like to talk about work both ways. If you resign then in law your employer can sue you for breach of contract. That must be for a loss that they can quantify, which isn't always easy to do - but it is also far from impossible. You could, therefore, end up being sued, and owing more to the employer than you ever earned plus their legal costs. This does not happen often - but it does happen and you have been told it does, so don't complain to me if it does! The problem with this one is that everybody assumes that they won't be the unlucky one, or the employer can't prove a loss, etc., etc., - if everybody was right there wouldn't be any such cases, and there are. So do remember that in the words of the Lottery "It might be you"!

 

Not getting paid any wages, accrued holiday and or expenses is more likely. Yes, this is also a breach of contract and you can sue them - but it is actually far more likley that the employer will then counter-sue for the above! This scennario is actually far more common and could possibly still end up with you owing them money! It's one of those "people in glass houses" situation - so whilst I would not tell you not to take legal action to recover anything owed to you, I would not neceaasrily recommend doing so for this reason.

 

My personal favourite - I have only come across this one once in reality - but the client also "thought it would never happen to him"... The employer finds out where you have moved to, and writes to the employer, threatening them with legal action for inducing you to breach of contract (this assumes that you are going to work somewhere else - but you'd be kind of daft to give up a job without one to go to, so I am assuming that is the case) - the new employer sacks you as a result and the old employer still sues you! So you end up unemployed, owing money, and with a CCJ.

 

I should also add that I don't understand the third point really - but if you have ordered supplies and these belong to your employer, if you keep any supplies you could be charged with theft - if you have ordered supplies which you have paid for and the company should reimburse, I would suggest you can go whistle for the money because I doubt you will ever see it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you've been provided with a written statement of the terms and conditions of employment, and haven't challenged with your employer as to the terms contained within it, then you are bound by the terms there in. Whether or not you've signed it is of no significance.

What exactly is making you so unhappy in the job, and what is so different about the work conditions from what you were led to believe?

What I'd suggest, if you're so deeply dissatified with your new appointment, is that you explain this to your employer and see if you can come to some agreement to terminate the relationship without serving the months notice. If they refuse, I think you're tied to serving the notice period.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks SarEl for your thoughts and guidance.

 

The supplies which I ordered can be utilised by any successor.

 

I just want to leave this job (even though I have no waiting job offers since this new job was meant as a long-term step) and I do not plan on asking them for the wages. I also glean that it would be most wise to deal with this amicably.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to you also, Elpulpo- very much appreciate it.

 

After hassling them much, I had been shown the contract (with utmost reluctance) some months ago and had pointed out various points in the t&c in which I needed amendment. They promised to 'look into it', but never made any changes.

 

To answer your questions, there are just so many factors which is making this job intolerable and I desist from listing most. One example is that I was told that I would be provided with various mandatory tools and resources for this new job- and now they are refusing to provide any despite my persistent requests. I tend to survive in the toughest environment; this has exceeded the threshold point- and I am not the only one, considering that there has been a massive exodus in the past for the same reasons which I am now facing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Careful as all this stress may cause you to go off sick for an indefinite time. If this happens, hand in your notice immediately. If not, hand it in immediatley anyway.

 

Indeed! I cannot deal with all this excess stress- I also have a very high bp.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be worth going to your GP and being signed off due to your BP, it's not worth risking your health over a job you have no care for and do not intend to pursue. Then approach your employer and say, 'look, I'm not coming back, so why don't we just draw a line under everything?'.

I'd ask for the wages, if I was you. You've done the work, and put up with a lot of crap in the process, by the sound of it.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are determined, then I can't disagree with any of the other posters - but I definitely agree with you that amicably is the way to go if at all possible. The problem with telling people that something is a low risk is that you never know who is at low risk until the employer does it! Having met someone who has lost thousands of £'s in this "low risk process", I am always wary of simply telling people it is a low risk and err on the side of making it very clear. Perhaps a bit overly cautious - but better that than someone taking your advice and ending up on the other side of it!

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely. I doubt many employers would be averse to coming to an agreement that an employee, particularly one with only a few weeks service, leave sooner than was contracted if they're evidently deeply unhappy with their new role.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks once again, Elpulpo and SarEl.

There is one additional matter which still bothers me: As mentioned (and with some additional clarifications), the office had pestered me to provide them with a list of supplies to be bought before I joined work. Consequently, some turned up (the remainder won't since the office has no plans of ordering these). All of these can be used by my successor. But would this provide a ground for dissent by my employer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...