Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the first item that I've ever claimed for - I don't really send too many parcels, probably 5 in the last 5 years, and only two with P2G / EVRi. I've attached two emails from P2G regarding their requiring the documents. They don't specify in the emails what documents I should be sending, although when opening the claim they were requesting that I needed photographic proof of sending - picture of the parcel with their label attached, in the EVRi ParcelShop. The second email is their closing the enquiry due to my failure to produce said document(s). I haven't yet drafted my claim letter, I wanted to be sure of this document situation first before I began action. But therein lies another problem. Not having a P2G account, I cannot be sure of the item value that I declared. The retail value at the time was £600, which is less than the £650 I paid several months earlier, so I would likely have used that, but I cannot be sure. And without having an account I can't be certain of the value I used - I may have declared more, but I doubt it. But, I know that I did properly declare the item and a value that reflected its then retail price. but now that the retail price has reduced substantially, even though the nature of compensation is to return the claimant back to their original position, without my purchase receipt, I was concerned that I may have to claim for less. And yes, I've been through the huge document store of information that you have, MoneySavingExpert, Which, Citizens Advice, Gov.uk "make a court claim", my own law books (annoyingly I specialised in consumer law when I studied for my law degree, but I graduated 17 years ago), and so now feel that its time to either act, or drop it. P2G Enquiry (2).pdf P2G Enquiry (1).pdf
    • I have found both forms online  https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/62e14db38fa8f5649f912647/TE9.pdf https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c73ad0d3bf7f4bd6a9bc69/te7-dart-eng.pdf   do i just fill in both forms and send to the address on them or directly to Manchester council  forgive my ignorance    thanking you in advance 
    • This is a little strange. Please pop onto MCOL, copy the claim history and paste it here.
    • I applied online via the website but got the attached reply which does not address my issue  any guidance where I can get this form from and how to do this process    thank you  I wasn’t given any ticket or anything similar at all  thanks 
    • Cheers @FTMDave  Yeah hopefully cases like this should discourage them from this nonsense as it’s surely adding to their overheads.     MCOL says defence received so will prep by reading through those links 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MBNA-Link Finance, what do I do Next?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4857 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi to all.

 

I would be grateful if anyone could advise me as to what would be my next step regarding Link Finance as I seem to have run out of ideas of my own.

 

I was on a debt managemant with Payplan and was making pro rata payments to my creditors via them. One of my creditors was MBNA for a credit card with a balance of approx £2800. In January 2009, whilst checking my Payplan payment summary, I noticed that MBNA was no longer on my list of creditors but five payments of the same amount were now being paid to a company called Link Financial, who up to this point I had never heard of. Payplan were of no use, they claimed that they were unaware of any changes to my creditors or my circumstances, MBNA would tell me nothing oher than they had sold the debt on.

 

I finally managed to get in touch with Link, who had been silent up till this point, and thats when the trouble really started. They have since been threatening and abusive.

 

I followed the advice that I have read on here. I first sent off my £1 and requested a true copy of my CCA agreement. After two more leters informing hem hat they were in default, I received a letter claiming to be a holding letter saying that they had trouble in locating my paperwork.I replied saying that this was not acceptable and claimed that the reason they could not find the CCA was because one did not exsist, therfore I would not acknowledge any claim they made against me and that any legal acion would be vigourusly contested, I also stopped payment to them. Two days later I receive a letter form Link saying they had enclosed the document that I requested and they had fulfilled their obligation to my request. The document they enclosed was a very clearly worded credit card application form. It had no terms and conditions attached and best of all was for a credit card application for a Bank of Scotland credit card not MBNA.

 

I again wrote to Link stating the above, requesting that they stop all data processing, remove any entries they had made on my credit files, return the money that they had taken and of course reminded them that I did not acknowledge the debt.

 

I have since repeated this request twice but they still continue to persue this alleged debt. The telephone calls are continuous, even though I have put in writing to them, that all communication should be in writing. Link is still to produce a valid CCA, I have never received a Notice of Assignment from MBNA. All my letters were sent recorded.

 

What can I do to stop this harrassment from Link, get them to remove their entries from

my credit file? My apologies for the length of the post, I though it was better to try to give as much info as possible. All and any advice will be very welcome.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them the 'Telephone Harassment' letter & demand they remove any contact numbers they have for you at once, if they keep phoning report them to OFT/TS breach of CPUTR 2008, OFCOM breach Section Section 127 Communications Act 2003 and the Police for breaches of Section 1 & 2 Harrasment Act 1997.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should also report Link to the OFT and Trading standards for continuing to chase whilst the account is in dispute.

 

http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/contact

 

If you have not yet sent an Account in dispute letter, then do so as until that is done, they will say they do not know the account is 'in dispute'.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...-is-in-dispute

Link to post
Share on other sites

Report them. I assume that your letters to them are sent registered post and you can prove that they have recieved them.

Continued harassment by telephone and text message is a breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

It is also a breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127

 

Dont let the parasite dca's prosper

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Delta and Harrassed,

 

Thank you both for your information, it's a great help.

Any Ideas how I can get them to stop handling and processing my data with credit reference agencies whilst this account is in dispute?

 

Thanks again

 

Andy

Edited by SamVimes
spelling error
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, SamVines.

 

I have merged both your threads, always better sticking with the one regarding this subject, lets others know what info you've already been given.

Please continue to post here regarding this.

 

Thanks,

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try this amended to suit your circumstances

 

You have failed to comply with my request, and as such the account entered default after 12+2 working days pursuant to the consumer credit act 1974

The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executed agreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required terms and statutory notices and was signed by both your company and myself as defined in section 61(1) of CCA 74 and subsequent Statutory Instruments. If the executed agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are also obliged to send me a copy of that document. In addition a full statement of this account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits to the account.

 

This limit has expired.

 

As you are no doubt aware section 78(6) states:

 

If the creditor fails to comply with Subsection (1)

 

(a) He is not entitled , while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

Therefore this account has become unenforceable at law.

 

As you have failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, Failed to send a full statement of the account and Failed to provide any of the documentation requested. You will also be aware of the CPUTR 2008 and the OFT's guidelines on debt collection which state under the title Deceptive and/or unfair methods - Examples of unfair practices are as follows - 2.8

 

(i) - 'Failing to investigate and/or provide details as appropriate, when a debt is queried or disputed, possibly resulting in debtors being wrongly pursued'

 

(k) - 'Not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonable queried or disputed debt'

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect.

 

This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data.

 

It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; You must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY

Action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

Dont let the parasite dca's prosper

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all

 

I'm new to this thread although I've started a thread of my own regarding Link. They claim tp be the owners of a debt bought from MBNA when we sent a formal CCA request for a copy of the credit aggreement and all asscociated documents and recieved a copy of an application form for a Bank of Scotland credit card with a letter saying that this fullfills their ogbigation under the consumer credit act 2006. I sent the formal account in default letter 12+2 days later only to receive a further letter stating that as far as they are concerned they have fullfilled their obligations and therefore the debt is not in default therefore pay up. I am sending further corresspondence quoting a recent ruling by the court of appeal about a similar matter but any further advice would be gratefully received.

 

Regards

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Angry Cat

 

The thing thats still annoying me is the fact that the application form is for a bank of scotland card and not MBNA. As far as I am aware BoS is part of the Lloyds group and nothing to do with MBNA

 

Regards

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware BoS is part of the Lloyds group and nothing to do with MBNA

 

 

Hi,

 

I'm sure there was a legal transfer of all Bank of Scotland rights to MBNA(May 2007).

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try this amended to suit your circumstances

 

You have failed to comply with my request, and as such the account entered default after 12+2 working days pursuant to the consumer credit act 1974

The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executed agreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required terms and statutory notices and was signed by both your company and myself as defined in section 61(1) of CCA 74 and subsequent Statutory Instruments. If the executed agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are also obliged to send me a copy of that document. In addition a full statement of this account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits to the account.

 

This limit has expired.

 

As you are no doubt aware section 78(6) states:

 

If the creditor fails to comply with Subsection (1)

 

(a) He is not entitled , while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

Therefore this account has become unenforceable at law.

 

As you have failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, Failed to send a full statement of the account and Failed to provide any of the documentation requested. You will also be aware of the CPUTR 2008 and the OFT's guidelines on debt collection which state under the title Deceptive and/or unfair methods - Examples of unfair practices are as follows - 2.8

 

(i) - 'Failing to investigate and/or provide details as appropriate, when a debt is queried or disputed, possibly resulting in debtors being wrongly pursued'

 

(k) - 'Not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonable queried or disputed debt'

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect.

 

This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data.

 

It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; You must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY

Action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

 

It would appear that this response is now out of date, as all the things we tell them they cannot do, it now turns out they can do, and will do , and do do ( does that make any sense lol!)

 

I beleive this is the link to the updated letter that should be sent:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?436-Failiure-to-provide-a-copy-of-the-agreement-within-the-prescribed-timescale

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...