Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, I have an update on my case that I’d like to share with you all.  so after submitting 371 pages in my bundle, a witness statement and skeleton argument for my court case due to take place in Manchester on June 21st I got an email from my litigator stating that hmrc have pulled out and the case is now closed!    this is the body of the letter….. This letter, which is copied to the Appellant, pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, the Respondents gives notice to the Tribunal of their intention to not defend the above appeal.   The Respondents respectfully invite the Tribunal to allow the appeal and close its file. In lieu of the above the Respondents would respectfully ask the Tribunal to vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday 21 June 2024. We would accordingly invite the Tribunal to close its file. Obviously this is extremely good news which hasn’t sunk in that after 3 years of fighting it is over.    I do have a further fight on my hands in that the Group Action I had joined with Independent Tax that had been disbanded in November last year and I chose not to continue with them. They are trying to bill me over 5k for the work they did under that Group Action which is ludicrous bearing in mind the whole point in joining was that it would keep the cost to a minimum as it would be shared between us all. They had asked if I wanted to continue to have them represent me on an individual level which I declined, if I hadn’t, goodness knows what they would have been trying to charge me now. 
    • President Ruto says Kenyans pay less tax than citizens in some other African countries.View the full article
    • As PM Sunak really showed his true colours at the D Day Commemorations by doing what? Oh I am the British PM lets just leave early I have better things to do and as he is called out on disrespecting all those veterans that served our country for the freedoms we have today he gives a groveling apology to little to late. He knew about this event for a long time and also knew that this is probably the last D Day Commemoration due to the age of those Veterans who gave so much for there countries freedom. Even on the day of the D Day Commemoration he still could have changed his plans As PM and stayed but choose not to showing such DISRESPECT to those Veterans, those that lost there lives and Families for the Freedoms we have today Being a Veteran myself I have never known a PM to show such disrespect what the hell was he thinking SHAME ON YOU PM SUNAK  
    • Thanks. We'll try to help over the weekend. If the hearing is on 05/07 then it's 90% sure that the deadline for filing your WS is 21/06.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Small Collection of Debts, Grateful for Advice on Procedure


deannat003
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4922 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I honestly have read through some of this forum but wanted to clarify what I should do about these debtsbut for a supposedly intelligent person, find it a bit confusing so here i am posting for clarification.

 

I am on benefits, no spare money at all, and I believe I am getting letters chasing statute barred debts (they were taken out early 2000, and I have paid nothing nor made an agreement to pay).

 

One of the debts is for over £3k (debt was £1,900) for a pc from TimeComputers., there was a payment free year, and by the time payments were due not only had Time gone into receivership, we had moved and were in radically different circumstances ourselves. I have had no contact with the collection agency. It is at least 6 years old.

 

I am also receiving letters from Philips for what I think is a credit card debt (£1.7k) with HSBC. This card was taken at about the same time as the above Debt. I did try to deal with HSBC at the time we hit problems, but they wanted all the debts paid immediately, which I just couldn't do (was trying to set a payment plan with them). The loan and overdraft I had with HSBC is not being chased any longer, possibly because its time barred. I have not contacted them since I contacted them at the time we got into trouble. Again, this was from at least 6 years ago. As its probably a credit card debt, can this still be time barred?

 

With regard to both of the debts, do I start by asking for a copy of the credit agreement as per the template letter on this site?

 

I also have one debt that is not statute barred from Telefonica O2 UK limited for under £500 for a mobile phone. Tried to have this phone replaced under insurance as it wouldn't work, but the delivery company could not seem to manage to get the phone to us. Must be the most incompetent courier company ever, wasted many hours/days waiting for the courier to call, at two different addresses (couriers somehow couldn't find either it seemed altho one was in the middle of a main city) . O2 were singularly unhelpful and as my OH needed a phone urgently for his business which we clearly stated several times, after two and a half weeks, we told 02 we felt justified in saying they'd cancelled the contract with their ineptitude and got a phone elsewhere. They have been chasing this money ever since (2008). They said our argument was with the insurance company /their courier (which was the one 02 used, not an independent) when I tried to argue this on receipt of the debt collection letters. Haven't contacted them since. No payment agreement has been made. What is my position with regards to this debt. It was in my name, altho the phone was my now ex's phone altho I am pretty sure this makes no difference.

 

I have no car, and rent where I live. Nothing I can sell (don't buy expensive tv's etc, don't go out ever, second hand clothes on ebay etc) and can't find work as I am a carer for my older son (he has autism). I'd appreciate any help. Iit is time I stop just worrying about these debts and sort out my position with them.

Edited by deannat003
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to here about your troubles..it seems the slimeballs like to get particularly active over the festive period.

 

I am only a newbie here and dont want to give any specific advice...I am sure that will be along soon. However I suspect with regards to the SB debts the advice will be to send the letter below:

 

Written by 42man

 

Letter sent when debt is statute barred (send recorded)

 

1 High Street,

Newtown,

Kent

R21 4RH

 

 

June 28, 2006

 

 

The Loan Company

Company House,

Church Street,

Newtown,

Kent,

R1 7HG

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Acc/Ref No 4563210025897412

 

You have contacted us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by ourselves.

 

We would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”

 

We would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period”.

 

The last payment of this alleged debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to CPUTR2008

 

We await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

 

We look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Mr A N Other

 

You will no doubt get a standard reply to say that what they are doing is not enforcement and that they can continue to contact you and contract CRA's - I suspect if this is the case (again other will advise) I would not get overly concerned...make sure that they only write to you and make a note of all contact so that if they become a common occurance you have a remedy against them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dean

 

Firstly welcome to the forum, can you please do a list of creditors, with ammounts and comms you have had like this.

 

1 Lloyds tsb circa 2004, approx 2 k loan, comms.....................

2.........

3.....................

so on so forth

 

Advise and assistance will follow

 

Mr

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

XmasWelcomeOrn01.gif

 

OK, all good advice already received.

 

A couple of bits of advice:

 

Do not talk to anyone about these matters on the telephone - you need to create 'a paper trail' so get a multi file folder and start doing this.

 

Once we get the answers to the above questions we can start to offer individual advice for each one and to that end it may be easier for all concerned if you keep this thread for one debt and create new threads for each of the others. Most of us have or did have many threads during our times of trouble, we don't count!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Main thing is the ones you have mentioned - as long as there has definitely been 6 clear years with no acknowledgement or payment towards these debts, they are definitely SB. Send the letter and forget about them. You do get DCA's who try to collect these debts by using scare tactics to get people to pay up. If you receive any of these just remember they are SB and the law is on your side.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for your replies, sorry for the delay in answering my older son doesn't understand that I might have things I need to do on MY pc each evening lol.

 

Debt 1: Originally for £1,500 with GE Capital (finance company) for a PC purchased through Time Computers around 2003 (but can't be certain of the date, I may be able to find the purchase receipt but can't be sure I will).. passed into the hands of Buchananclark & Wells, now being pursued by Aktiv Kapital (yes, I've seen the threads). The amount they have been asking for for the last few years has been stable at £3112.98 (it went up to £4480 in 2007)

No phone calls, made no acknowledgements of the debt, agreements to make any kind of payment to any debt collection company, just received letters. I now have a letter dated 10th December 2010 offering a 'full and final settlement' figure of 2179.09.

 

Debt 2: Originally for roughly £1000, for a debt originally with the HSBC .., I had a loan and current account in overdraft and a credit card with them. I have not heard from them in recent years re the overdraft or loan amount, but I think this relates to the credit card account i had with them. I did offer to make payments when we were originally in trouble (quite high payments) but they said they wanted all three debts settled at once, immediately. I haven't contacted them since. It has passed through a number of collection companies but is now with Philips. Received a letter dated October titled pre-visit notice. I am certain that this is statue barred as I got into trouble 2002/2003. The letters are asking for £1,675.61

 

Debt 3: Telefonica 02 UK £404.20 for a phone that stopped working, tried to get the phone replaced through the insurance I took out thru 02 but their courier company seemed unable to manage to make delivery. After 2-3 weeks of waiting in with non delivery (and we needed the phone urgently) I phoned 02 and informed them that due to their ineptitude, I regarded the contract as cancelled. I have repeated this to a couple of finance company's but was told my dispute was with the insurance company so I still owed 02. I have made no agreement to pay. Last letter was labelled interim notice and dated 2009.

 

Debt 4: Credit card with PC World, now being pursued by Scotcall Debt Collection Services. They are looking for £772. Again, I think this should be statute barred or close to it. I can't remember exactly when I took out the credit card though. Last letter received 2009

 

With the last two.., do I just wait and see if they are pursued? The first two should be statute barred as over 6 years old. Do I send a 'prove it' letter, or a statute barred letter to the first two companies.., or something else.

 

I do also have a horrible problem with a tax credit overpayment but doubt this is the right forum for that (totalling £3k). Typical story, phoned to tell them of a change of circumstances at the same time I phoned everyone else (on benefits), a year later they denied I'd made the call, and that I'd been claiming single parent family benefits fraudulently. Appeal denied. I have no proof I made this call. They are not taking the money back as yet, but I expect them too soonish. I won't go into more details, but what they are doing is totally wrong.

 

I receive Income support, tax credits, DLA and carers allowance. Recently split up from an iffy relationship rather traumatically and my finances are in a mess. Am barely managing to buy food right now because I am in debt in other areas but paying them off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going to go through your post mentioning things in red as they occur to me - maybe add comments at end as well.

 

Hi, thanks for your replies, sorry for the delay in answering my older son doesn't understand that I might have things I need to do on MY pc each evening lol.

 

Debt 1: Originally for £1,500 with GE Capital (finance company) for a PC purchased through Time Computers around 2003 (but can't be certain of the date, I may be able to find the purchase receipt but can't be sure I will).. passed into the hands of Buchananclark & Wells, now being pursued by Aktiv Kapital (yes, I've seen the threads). The amount they have been asking for for the last few years has been stable at £3112.98 (it went up to £4480 in 2007)

No phone calls, made no acknowledgements of the debt, agreements to make any kind of payment to any debt collection company, just received letters. I now have a letter dated 10th December 2010 offering a 'full and final settlement' figure of 2179.09.Sounds as though it's SB and they know it, hence the offer of the discount. Send the SB letter, but if there's any doubt at all in your mind re the 6 years make your you write somewhere in the letter that you do not acknowledge the debt.

 

Debt 2: Originally for roughly £1000, for a debt originally with the HSBC .., I had a loan and current account in overdraft and a credit card with them. I have not heard from them in recent years re the overdraft or loan amount, but I think this relates to the credit card account i had with them. I did offer to make payments when we were originally in trouble (quite high payments) but they said they wanted all three debts settled at once, immediately. I haven't contacted them since. It has passed through a number of collection companies but is now with Philips. Received a letter dated October titled pre-visit notice. I am certain that this is statue barred as I got into trouble 2002/2003. The letters are asking for £1,675.61SB - send them the SB letter.

 

Debt 3: Telefonica 02 UK £404.20 for a phone that stopped working, tried to get the phone replaced through the insurance I took out thru 02 but their courier company seemed unable to manage to make delivery. After 2-3 weeks of waiting in with non delivery (and we needed the phone urgently) I phoned 02 and informed them that due to their ineptitude, I regarded the contract as cancelled. I have repeated this to a couple of finance company's but was told my dispute was with the insurance company so I still owed 02. I have made no agreement to pay. Last letter was labelled interim notice and dated 2009.When you say you've repeated this to a couple of finance companies, do you mean DCA's? If so who were they? Who was the letter from in 2009? When did you sign the contract for the phone? Have you made any payments at all towards it? 2-3 weeks in did you put the cancellation and reasons for doing so in writing?

 

Debt 4: Credit card with PC World, now being pursued by Scotcall Debt Collection Services. They are looking for £772. Again, I think this should be statute barred or close to it. I can't remember exactly when I took out the credit card though. Last letter received 2009Scotcall like debts that are near to being SB. If you haven't heard for a year I'd let sleeping dogs lie. If they write again, ignore the first letter, then if they write again send a Prove It letter.

 

With the last two.., do I just wait and see if they are pursued? The first two should be statute barred as over 6 years old. Do I send a 'prove it' letter, or a statute barred letter to the first two companies.., or something else.

 

I do also have a horrible problem with a tax credit overpayment but doubt this is the right forum for that (totalling £3k). Typical story, phoned to tell them of a change of circumstances at the same time I phoned everyone else (on benefits), a year later they denied I'd made the call, and that I'd been claiming single parent family benefits fraudulently. Appeal denied. I have no proof I made this call. They are not taking the money back as yet, but I expect them too soonish. I won't go into more details, but what they are doing is totally wrong.

 

I receive Income support, tax credits, DLA and carers allowance. Recently split up from an iffy relationship rather traumatically and my finances are in a mess. Am barely managing to buy food right now because I am in debt in other areas but paying them off. Straightforward! Get in touch with your MP and inform them of the situation.They will get involved and if necessary refer your case to the parliamentary ombudsman who deals with overpayments of tax credits and some other benefits. Has to be done via your MP though.

 

Hope the advice has helped,

 

Tingy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going to go through your post mentioning things in red as they occur to me - maybe add comments at end as well.

 

Debt 3: Telefonica 02 UK £404.20 for a phone that stopped working, tried to get the phone replaced through the insurance I took out thru 02 but their courier company seemed unable to manage to make delivery. After 2-3 weeks of waiting in with non delivery (and we needed the phone urgently) I phoned 02 and informed them that due to their ineptitude, I regarded the contract as cancelled. I have repeated this to a couple of finance company's but was told my dispute was with the insurance company so I still owed 02. I have made no agreement to pay. Last letter was labelled interim notice and dated 2009.When you say you've repeated this to a couple of finance companies, do you mean DCA's? If so who were they? Who was the letter from in 2009? When did you sign the contract for the phone? Have you made any payments at all towards it? 2-3 weeks in did you put the cancellation and reasons for doing so in writing?

 

The phone contract was in my name, but was my now ex's phone (altho I am aware I am legally liable). Purchased it online on an 12 month contract. We were roughly 5 months into this contract, so payments had been made and were up to date up until we were supposed to get a replacement for a completely non working phone through 02's insurance. I spoke to 02 as soon as they sent overdue notice letters, and also the initial DCA .., but not sure which one.., I'm afraid I haven't kept all the letters on this debt. It has been pursued by buchananclark + Wells May 2009, then Scotcall July 2009. Not heard anything since altho of course, doesn't mean that's the end of it.

 

]

 

And thank you Tingy, you've been a big help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...