Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have never heard of any such law. Please post a link to what you have read online that explains this law. And please confirm whether you were ever married to or in a formal Civil Partnership with your Ex.
    • Today has been hectic so  have been unable to complete the whole thing. If you now understand it and want to go ahead with a complaint to the IPC, fine. If not then I won't need to finish it. But below is my response to your request  on post 64. No you don't seem stupid, the Protection of Freedoms Act isn't easy to get one 's head around at first. The part of the above Act referring to private parking is contained within Schedule 4 which you can find online under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Section 9 of SCH.4 relates to how the parking scrotes have to perform so that they can transfer their right to pursue the keeper from the driver when the PCN is still unpaid after a certain amount of time. In your case the PCN was posted to you the keeper and arrived within 14 days from when they claimed a breach occurred. That means they complied with first part of the Act. The driver at that time was still responsible to pay the charge demanded on the PCN and PCM now have to wait for 28 days to elapse before they can write and advise the keeper that as the charge has not been paid, that they now have the right to pursue the keeper. They claim they sent the first PCN on the 13th March, five days after the alleged breach and it arrived on Friday 15th March. So to comply with the Act they have to observe Section 8 subsection 2f   (f)warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given— (i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So the first PCN was deemed to arrive on the 15th March and for 28 days to have elapsed is when the time is right for them to write and say you are now liable as keeper. So they sent the next PCN on the 12th April which is too early as you could still have paid until midnight of the 12th. So the earliest their second PCN should have gone to you was  Saturday 13th April so more likely on Monday 15th April. The IPC Code of Conduct states "Operators must be aware of their legal obligations and implement the relevant legislation and guidance when operating their businesses." So by issuing your demand a day early, they have broken the Act, the IPC Code of Conduct, the DVLA agreement  to abide by the law and the Code of Conduct not to mention a possible breach of your GDPR .   I asked the IPC  in the letter on an earlier to confirm that  CPMs Notice misrepresenting the law was a standard practice for all of PCMs Notices or just certain ones. Their distribution  may depend on when they were issued and whether they were issued in certain localities or for certain breaches. Whichever method used is a serious breach of the Law and could lead to PCM being black listed by the DVLA . One would expect that after that even if the IPC did not cancel your ticket, PCM could not risk going to Court with you nor even pursuing you any further.
    • thanks jk2054 - do you know any law i can quote (regarding timeframe) when sending the email as if i cant they'll probably just say no like the normal staff have done? thanks.
    • I lived there with her up until I gave notice. She took over the tenancy in her name. I had a letter from the council and a refund of the council tax for 1 month.    She took on the bills and tenancy and only paid the rent. No utility bills or council tax were paid once she took it over. She will continue to not pay bills in her new house which I'm now having to pay or will have to. I have looked online I believe the police and solicitors are going by the partner law to make me liable.   I have always paid my bills and ensured her half was paid then see how much free money is over.   She spends all her money on payday loans and rubbish then panics about the rent. I usually end up paying it or having to get her a loan.   Stupidly in my name but at the time it was because she was my partner. I even paid to move her and clean and decorate her old house so she got the deposit back. It cost me £3000 due to the mess she always leaves behind.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hilesden securities court papers received ** Discontinued ***


john
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4457 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

That is not a letter it is a 'General Form of Judgment or Order' as per the heading

 

You have got what you asked for from the Court from your N244, if you hear nothing by 4pm on the 18th write to the Court requesting that they strike out the claim. They may say you need to make another application if so just submit another N244 for a Strike Out together with full costs.

 

It is slightly unfortunate that your application crossed with their own Order re the AQs but then we were not aware they were already overdue....

 

But you will either have a proper claim to defend by the 18th or you can get rid of it.

If you find my advice helpful - please click on my scales

<<<<<< - they're over there!

Well, it's a funny black star now ...

The small print - any advice I give is freely given on the understanding that I am a layman and am not legally qualified in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 323
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Yes, you will need to pay to submit a further N244. However, you can do a supplementary costs schedule :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

How would I work out supplementary costs? gh2008 said it could easily come to 2/3rds of solicitors costs which could be 2-3 grand but I sent in the following when the judge requested my costs which I calculated from NGeddies thread

 

Dear Court Manager

 

In response to your letter dated xx/xx/xxxx

 

The costs in this case, to date, are as follows:-

 

Time spent researching the consumer credit act 1974 and the regulations 3hrs

time spent researching and reading case law 2hrs

time spent drafting defence and allocation questionnaires 3hrs

approximate total time spent at the litigant in person rate of £9.25 ph 8hrs

 

Other costs incurred:

 

Printing, Stationary and Postage £5.00

 

N244icon fee £40.00

 

Total other costs £45.00

 

Litigant in Person Costs 8 hrs @ £9.25 per Hour – £74.00

Other Costs Incurred - £45.00

Total Costs - £119.00

 

These costs are up to and including the Allocation Questionairre.

Edited by john
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Vicky,

 

I havent heard of such a form if one exists so suspect CitB is referring to doing another schedule of costs but clearly indicate that its an addition to the previous one sent to the court and it details costs newly incurred. So prepare it on that basis at present.

 

If not I'm sure I'll get corrected.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

vicky:-

 

Do I have to do anything now? theres no details on the discontinuance form for judges name, date etc? I'm a bit confused now, wasn't expecting this!!!

 

Ok, firstly you need to check with the courts on mon/tues/weds until they confirm theyve received same notice.... then you need to decide if you are going to chase for wasted costs... which is basically all the time you've spend on the case plus the court fees you've incurred.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then you need to decide if you are going to chase for wasted costs... which is basically all the time you've spend on the case plus the court fees you've incurred.S.

 

the judge asked me for costs previously which i calculated from NGeddies thread. However gh2008 said it would be much higher. I kept it low as I didn't want to look like I was taking the mick. Since then I had started researching for when they came up with a poc. have I shot myself in the foot by trying to be fair?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the judge asked me for costs previously which i calculated from NGeddies thread. However gh2008 said it would be much higher. I kept it low as I didn't want to look like I was taking the mick. Since then I had started researching for when they came up with a poc. have I shot myself in the foot by trying to be fair?

 

Nope but you will need to justify extra costs if you claim them, and remember if they dont agree to pay you will have to go via the court to get them although that in itself will add yet extra costs :-)

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

vicky:-

 

Thanks to everyone who's helped and encouraged me, I could never have done it without you, its definately your victory not mine xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

going to ask for advice re: costs on seperate thread as it might be useful to others in the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly congrats - and let this be an example (together with Gazbo's thread) as to one method of dealing with these claims

 

IMHO, as the costs were submitted to Court only and your wasted costs will be submitted to the Claimant only - I would start again with a proper costs breakdown.

 

Keep it reasonable and you will be fine. Should the other side refuse them then again IMHO the Court will hammer them as they have clearly just been wasting the Court's time.

 

By reasonableI would follow NGEddie's lead, of course substituting your actual hours spent ...... ;)

If you find my advice helpful - please click on my scales

<<<<<< - they're over there!

Well, it's a funny black star now ...

The small print - any advice I give is freely given on the understanding that I am a layman and am not legally qualified in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Vicky,

 

I havent heard of such a form if one exists so suspect CitB is referring to doing another schedule of costs but clearly indicate that its an addition to the previous one sent to the court and it details costs newly incurred. So prepare it on that basis at present.

 

If not I'm sure I'll get corrected.

 

S.

 

My apologies, yes just do another costs schedule for those extra costs and attach to the original. HTH

 

Having said that I notice gh has advised a better method :)

 

Good news the discontinuance eh :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

So do I send my costs to Aplins, not court? At last I have found the proper breakdown on NGeddies thread. If I claimed the real hourly cost of my internet research they would be bankrupt lol. For all my visits to court I have taxi receipts but didn't think they were included. Is it ok to put them in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...