Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Urgent: I need some help/advice re: Equita bailiff - action due tomorrow 5th Nov 2010


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4968 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I've read quite a few posts on the forum and now have a general idea of what to do and what not to do (or what should have been done!) but would appreciate advice regarding the current situation since it may be too late?

Apologies if there's too much information but I just want to be sure and find out where she stands.

 

Here's the deal:

 

My girlfriend received a knock on the door by an Equita bailiff on 23rd September 2010 re: unpaid council tax.

Unfortunately, she was waiting for a courier that day and mistook the Bailiff knocking the door for the courier.

The bailiff explained who he was and asked to come in, to which she agreed :!:

(Having read several forum posts here today, we now realise that doing this was not a good idea).

 

Anyway, he was actually quite a pleasant chap and explained the situation to her and gave her 2 documents.

One of the documents was a standard 'Delivered by hand - BAILIFF REMOVAL - Final Notice' red letter (she can't recall receiving any letters prior to this) dated 23rd September 2010 stating 'Payment due in full - 24 Hours'. Nowhere on this letter is an amount stated although it does mention the outstanding Council Tax Liability Order. He crossed through the content of the letter and circled his contact details and went on to explaining the other document and what was involved/what would happen.

 

The other document is an Equita 'Form 7 - Notice of seizure and inventory of goods' - I'm guessing this is a pretty standard document at the 'I'm in your house' stage. The printed form has space for Bailiff ref, Debtor Name and Address, Bailiff Name etc and states 'I have attended today at the above address to seize and distrain upon goods and chattels for' with Council Tax ticked.

It goes on to say 'Absence of payment will result in goods being removed and sold at public auction ....' etc.

There is an 'Inventory of goods' section where he listed TV, Xbox and DVD player (all of which my girlfriend doesn't actually own).

 

The form also has 'Form 8' - 'Form of walking possession agreement (request not to remove goods immediately)

 

He got her to sign the form and get her to agree to pay the debt on or before 5th November 2010, but to call him if she anticipated any problem with this arrangement.

 

The amount owing on the Council Tax is £1314.96

Bailiff costs (inc VAT) £263.50

Nothing under 'Total amount if paid today' or 'Bailiff costs continue at _p per day thereafter'

Total: £1578.46!!!

 

Is this daylight robbery or what?

 

With the above scenario in mind, my girlfriend is fortunate enough to be in a position to make full payment tomorrow if necessary, but is it necessary? ie, can the Council Tax arrears be paid directly to the council and can the Bailiff fee be fully/partially avoided?

 

I read some of the comments in another thread about £42.50 bailiff fees and speaking to/paying the Council directly, but to be honest I'm confused as to what can and can't be done under the circumstances.

 

The only other thing to add was that my girlfriend called the bailiff earlier this evening and left a message on his voicemail re: payment and that she'd call him again in the morning.

Unfortunately, this was before reading through some of the posts - it's a real shame we didn't find this forum before now but you live and learn.

 

As time is of the essence, any good advice would be most appreciated so thanks in advance.

 

Regards,

 

 

 

needinfo

Edited by needinfo
Link to post
Share on other sites

pay the council what they want by internet banking using the details on the back of a ctax bill.

 

as for the bailiff.

 

 

write to the bailiff co asking for a breakdown of his fees and a screenshot.

 

when the bailff calls, dont let him in, tell him its been paid direct to the council and that you are disputing his actions/fees/charges.

if he will not leave, call the police.

 

if you have had no previous letters etc, then i think he is trying to fleece you blind.

 

i would also complain to the council about his actions

they are responsible for what he does as they have employed him

don't be fobbed off, ask to speak to the chief exec office if they play silly buggers.

 

you should also have received court papers and a liabilty order well before he got to your door.

if you did not get those,

then you need to ask the council where they were sent too ask well

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As DX has suggested your girlfriend can pay direct to the council via their online payment facility.

The levy is invalid as the items do not belong to her so the bailiff cannot charge for these, all your girlfriend owes at this stage to the bailiff is £24.50.

May I suggest your girlfriend pays what she owes to the council via internet and print off the receipt and either pin it to the door for the bailiff to see when he comes round, She will however incur another bailiff fee of £18.00 for a second visit. However this can be included in with what she owes to the council. Alternatively she can text the bailiff that the bill has now been paid and all relevant paper work has been faxed/email to the bailiffs office.

You need to write/email the bailiffs office and ask for a breakdown of fees and to let them know that the items listed did not belong to her. This makes the levy invalid

A state dec may need to be obtained and this can be done at your local county court or at a solicitors. It usually costs about £10.00

A bailiff can however Levy on a first visit, but be sure to get a breakdown of all his fee's and charges as what he has charged is wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

he cant levylink3.gif etc etc on the first visit.

 

dx100ulk this is wrong bailiffs should levy on the first visit thats the reason for the bailiffs visit to levy distress

 

 

For making a visit to premises with a view to

Levying distress (where no levy is made)

Edited by hallowitch
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for all the help and advice so far.

 

As she needs to get on this asap in order to avoid today's planned visit, to summarise:

 

My girlfriend need only pay the CT amount + £24.50 to the council via internet payment and then follow this up with a text to the bailiff to advise what's been done, ie payment made direct.

Thereafter, send copies of the respective documentation to the council (complaint) and bailiff co. (receipt and stat dec) as appropriate?

 

Does this sound right?

 

Many thanks again for all your help, it is most appreciated.

 

 

needinfo

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes sorry amended

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the bailiff has made 2 visits to her property so legal bailiff fees are £42.50 pay this and the amount outstanding on the liability order

 

 

As it stands the bailiff is under the assumption that he has a valid levy as no one has laid claim to levied goods as of yet therefore he can assume they belong to the debtor

Having said that The bailiff wont re-enter your property to remove goods

when a bailiff Levy's goods the goods levied must cover

all bailiff fees removal fees storage fees auction fees and a substantial portion of the debt so unless the TV, Xbox and DVD player are top of the rage and would make a considerable amount at auction he wont re-enter to remove them

 

you will have to contest the levy either by a statutory declaration or several letters of complaint to Equita and your council

Link to post
Share on other sites

To: (the bailiffslink3.gif) (their address)

I (your name)

of (your address)

Do solemnly and sincerely declare that:

the items listed

tv

x Box

DVD player

are not the property of (your friends name) and (reason why they were there) and have always been my sole property

And I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same to be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835 and Section 5 of The Perjury Act 1911.

 

signature:

 

Declared at

 

On the day of two thousand and

 

Before me

 

A Commissioner for Oaths, or Notary Public/Justice of the Peace/Solicitor having the powers conferred on a Commissioner for OathsBefore me

 

 

 

councils don't administrate there own council tax they outsource it one of the company's some councils use is Capita who own Equita

 

As you are dealing with Equita i suggest a stat dec is the way to go get 3 copy's send 1 to equita 1 to the revenues department of your council ask for it to put on file for future use if necessary and 1 to keep they MUST BE SENT BY RECORDED DELIVERY

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow!

Now that's thorough.

I can't thank you guys enough for this invaluable information.

Getting the remaining docs sorted asap.

 

Btw, to confirm - the bailiff has only made the one visit to date.

Now he's had the text message and from what you're saying about the listed goods (they're not top of the range), is it fair to assume he won't be returning?

Thanks,

 

needinfo

Link to post
Share on other sites

what you're saying about the listed goods (they're not top of the range), is it fair to assume he won't be returning?

Thanks,

 

No it fair to assume that he wont re-enter the property with a locksmith because once he takes this action he would have to sell the goods at auction

and he cant do that as they have very little value and wont cover the fees

 

He will however still pursue the outstanding fees until you have either provide the stat dec or go down the invalid levy route ( because the goods levied wont cover the fees) and get it in writing that the levy and associated fees (van/attendance)have been cancelled

 

 

Bailiff company's add there 1st 2nd visit fees before they visit

 

phone the council and ask for the date the of the liability order the date it was passed to Equita and the amount

 

send an e-mail to Equita asking for a breakdown of fees this will tell you when the 1st 2nd visits were allegedly made

 

If you can post up the notice of seizure (removing all personal info) it would help

did you look to see if the bailiff is Certificated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all again, an update:

 

C Tax amount + £24.50 paid via Internet to local council last Friday morning - have a Payment Authentication Receipt email and PDF copy of web page receipt/confirmation.

Sent bailiff a text advising that the bill has now been paid and that documents will be sent to Equita.

Still need to get the Stat Dec witnessed by an appropriate signee (doing this today).

Have an email address for the council's council tax dept. Although, have no email address for Equita and refuse to use the insecure contact form on their web site - does anyone have a valid email address for Equita?

 

Last night, my girlfriend and I arrived outside her house to find the bailiff sitting in his vehicle with an accomplice. As soon as he saw that I had opened the front door and picked up the day's post, he immediately told me 'Oh, ignore that' - referring to the red 'Bailiff Removal - payment due in 24 hours - final notice' letter.

He then said that he was there to speak to her, but asked me about the payment on Friday. I advised him that indeed a payment had been made to the council which covered the cost of the outstanding council tax + £24.50 fee. I did not however, disclose the full amount.

He then advised me that he'd checked over the weekend and 'sometimes, with the way she paid, these things don't show up straight-away'.

I advised him that I could assure him that she has a receipt for the payment - he didn't ask to see this.

 

By this time, his bouncer-like accomplice was standing by the vehicle in the middle of the road with arms crossed - obviously in an attempt to be menacing and intimidating.

The bailiff then approached my girlfriend although I didn't catch what was said as I was making sure the front door was locked.

 

Words were exchanged, although not particularly aggressive until I mentioned that my girlfriend was writing to both the council and Equita concerning all of this.

He asked what was the nature of the correspondence to which I replied that she wants to request a break-down of his 'charges' and to complain about the manner in which she was made to feel intimidated on his previous visit.

The bailiff then proceeded to show me a copy of the original walking possession order stating that the break-down was already clearly shown ie, the split between council tax amount and his 'charges'. I argued that the amount shown could not in any way be considered a break-down.

 

It was clear that the conversation wasn't proceeding as he would have liked and his parting comments were that my girlfriend had 24 hours in which to pay or he'd be back with a locksmith to gain entry.

 

 

Having checked the Certificated Bailiff Register on the HM Courts site, the 'Bailiff in charge' is not listed - what is the significance with this?

 

Also, under the circumstances, clearly, physical documentation won't arrive at either the council or Equita before the 24 hours is up - what action should she take now?

Do you think the threat of returning with a locksmith is a valid threat considering a) the value (or lack of) of the goods he's intending to remove and b) the fact that she doesn't actually own the goods?

 

I suppose the key thing this afternoon is to get the Stat Dec done.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

well he cant use a locksmith

usual crap from them

 

hallo should be up soon

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK great, thanks for your comment dx.

 

Just found this:

 

Non-certificated Bailiff

Working on behalf of companies and organisations, a Non-certificated Bailiff has the power to recover the money owed for a variety of debts by seizing and selling a person's goods. However, Non-certificated Bailiffs cannot levy distress for rent, road traffic debts, council tax or non-domestic rates.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First off any

link3.gif

has to come from the Company and not the
bailiff
link3.gif
. He is clearly trying to intimidate/bully/harrass/threaten which if done in a public place could be possibly classed as a criminal offence. His threat of the locksmith is just that. To do that he has to get the authorisation of the Claimant then go before a magistrate and prove that you were wilfully refusing to pay and pretty please could he have a piece of paper to allow him to force entry. This is something that is very rarely given so I wouldn't worry, if he does call again keep up the good work and deny him entry.

 

You could always contact the Council higher ups and complain their contractor is being a pain in the derriere and ask them to call him off, if they refuse you could always remind them they are wholly responsible for any actions he takes and you will have no hesitation in naming the Council as Co-Defendant in any future action you may take.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to double-check, I spoke to Ministry of Justice Public Register of Bailiffs on 020 3334 6355 who advised that this bailiff had a hearing due in July this year and advised me that I'd need to speak to the regular county court for confirmation of certificated status. He said that it doesn't necessarily mean that the bailiff isn't certificated ie, it could be that the court hasn't sent through updated details (July was a fair few months ago though?)

Anyway, I called the county court but was asked to call back later. So, in lieu of obtaining completely accurate confirmation, should my girlfriend text the bailiff saying that she's checked the HMCS on-line Certificated Bailiff's Register and that the search does not show him as certificated?

I also found out that he works for another bailiff company and so at this stage, can only assume Equita are sub-contracting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again,

Got confirmation that this bailiff is indeed certificated. Called HMCS to advise and query why the database hadn't been updated and was advised that any changes should have been notified by the court.

Basically, the list isn't 100% trustworthy so I would advise anyone not to rely on it and make as many enquiries as you can to find out the exact position/situation.

 

Anyhow, back to today - any advice on if the bailiff turns up again tonight?

ie, should she just be able to hand over a copy of the Stat Dec and send him packing?

 

Also, got all contact details ie, email addresses, postal addresses and fax/phone numbers for both council and Equita now re: complaint so the idea is to email, snail mail and telephone.

 

Any more advice?

 

Thanks so much.

 

 

needinfo

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...