Announcements
-
-
Tweets
-
Posts
-
By Sarahswoes · Posted
Thanks for the welcome honeybee! Grateful to have found this place! Just busy reading other excellent threads! -
By honeybee13 · Posted
Hello, welcome to CAG. I expect people will be along later to advise you. Weekends are always quieter here so please bear with us until they're able to get here. HB -
By Sarahswoes · Posted
Hope I'm posting in the correct forum. I am confused about procedure regarding going to civil court next week. The claimant (Erudio/Drydens) responded to my defence but I did not realise that I have to respond back. I'd be grateful if you could answer: Was I supposed to send them my updated defence and when? If I ask the court to do it now,, if they agree, can I just send it to the court or must I also send it to Drydens? I spoke to the court helpline and the lady said I can submit evidence even if it's a bit late (to go with my defence) so I've done that - I emailed it only to the court. I'm wondering if I need to submit this evidence to Drydens as well? THis is the situation; I have a civil court case with Erudio/Drydens regarding a pre-1998 student loan. The amount is "£2500. I did not defer as I didn't get the forms. My argument was that they mismanaged my account as they did not send me annual statements (I have proof - 2018 remediation pack) I believe the same happened with the forms. I was eligible to defer and only three years away from 50 so no reason not to. I have not moved. I've submitted my defence in July 2019 after which the case was stayed. But as I failed to communicate with them to settle the matter (I didn't know I had to reply to their offers to settle as I did not think what they were offering was fair) they have filed an Application in Sept 2023 to lift the stay a week ago I received a pack in the post with the court date which is next week. The package arrived 6 working days before the hearing, not seven as it says in the rules. Drydens then sent me the same package in the post four working days before the hearing with a letter saying they are waiting for the Order to be lifted. I'm worried now that they will not allow it to go to trial as Drydens claim that I have not submitted sufficient evidence. They although produced the copy of the deferment letters which they claim they sent. I didn't realise that I can amend my defence based on their reply to my defence. I thought the court was again going to send me a form to do that, like they did the first time. I'm clueless and have no money for a legal representation as I'm not working at the moment. Any help would be much appreciated! -
Is elphicke still with labour or has she jumped into the frankly far more apt 'reformatory yet? Sure that her move is just intended to destabilise Sunack for the poopy right I hear rumors Boris and Doris have tested the water through proxies - not sure if its true - and they probably happy to (are?) chance-it with all/any -
HB - they don't ask why. Karalius - just note these dates on the form and you'll be safe, they will not fix the hearing date when you're away. How to fill in the DQ/N180 is on just about every claim form thread here, such as Andy's post 81 here https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/458783-parkingeye-anpr-pcn-paploc-now-claimform-new-directions-holdings-lambourne-crescent-llanishen-cardiff-cf14-5gl-claim-discontinued/page/4/#comments
-
-
Recommended Topics
-
-
Our picks
-
If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,
If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.-
- 1 reply
-
-
Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld
ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,
Hello,
On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.
Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom. Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm. They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.
The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.
I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.
Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done.
Many thanks-
- 81 replies
-
-
A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report
WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,
Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299-
- 161 replies
-
-
Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available
BankFodder posted a post in a topic,
We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.
The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.
Frankly I don't think that is any accident.
One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.
Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.
We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
This is good ethical practice.
It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.
OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
-
-
-
Recommended Topics
-
.thumb.jpg.bf2f59e5260173230834ce3ad8015900.jpg)
style="text-align: center;">
Thread Locked
because no one has posted on it for the last 4956 days.
If you need to add something to this thread then
Please click the "Report " link
at the bottom of one of the posts.
If you want to post a new story then
Please
Start your own new thread
That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help
Thanks
-
Recently Browsing 0 Caggers
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Have we helped you ...?
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
Recommended Posts