Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though. A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees. https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyds TSB CC arrears


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4960 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I'm not new to the forums but I could really use some advice. (mods - please feel free to move to a more appropriate forum)

 

Currently owe 15000 on a LTSB platinum credit card. Wife got made redundant and we're in the muck. The card was upgraded to a platinum card around 9 years ago.

 

Following a debacle last year where LTSB took two direct debit payments in the same month I cancelled the DD and was making payment via internet banking.

 

Owing to wife's redundancy I've now missed 3 payments and the wolves are circling. I've just downloaded letter A from the DCA letters to stave them off while I obtain advice.

I want to examine the "proper execution" element of the CCA. I've read a couple of threads one advocating using rights under the Credit Act 1974 and the other suggesting using a SAR to obtain a signed copy of the agreement from them. Which is the best method?

 

BTW LTSB registered address is in London but CC's seem to be administered in Brighton. Which would be the best to use. My thinking is use the registered address. Does anyone have thoughts on the subject?

 

I'd be really grateful for any advice.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I'm not an expert but am currently in a similar process.

 

On the advice of National Debthelpline I wrote saying ..financila difficulties.. seeking advice..please hold 28 days. Then due to redundancy can't make any payments.

 

The reaction to this has varied greatly; some have issued a DN, most have not.

 

I have followed up with CCA.

 

Much of this is tactical and tactics change with recent court decisions. My own view is to take it slowly. A debt that genuinely cannot be repaid is less valuable. Two OCs have told me (quite friendly employees) that the debt will just be sold on if I don't meet min repayments of £5 per month or £1 month. I think they will all sell them on anyway after a time.

 

I can't afford to pay anything and I just keep repeating this. I am saving SAR for later in the process whent he debt is passed on; but this is just my tactical view.

 

Hope this helps

 

vic

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was PPI which wasn't worth a pinch of s**t when I was unable to find a contract and spent 1 yr out of work. We tried to claim and found as I was a company director (1 man outfit for contract) that they wouldn't pay out. This despite 3 times in the meeting when I signed up asking if they would payout to a company director and being assured I would. This is about 9 years ago so I think it is probably statutue barred to seek re-dress.

 

There have been charges which I will endeavour to work out but I may need to SAR them for that.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well some interesting developments yesterday and today.

 

Received a response to my S78 request yesterday.

 

My scanner has gone pete so I'll type up their response.

 

Dear Mr Pin1onU

 

I write in repsonse to your request for a copy of your consumer credit agreement under section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA)

 

I have enclosed with this letter a copy of the re-constituted version of your executed agreement and a signed statement of your account. by providing you with the documents attached to this letter, we have satisfied our obligation to provide a copy of the executed agreement under section 78. There is no requirement under the CCA to provide you with a copy of the original signed agreement. We are endeavouring to locate a copy of your signed agreement but please be assured we would not have opened a credit card account without having a sight of a signed agreement. For the avoidance of any doubt, we have set out in the appendix to this letter your rights under section 78.

 

Having satisfied our obligation under section 78, the agreement you have with us is fully enforceable and we shall continue to treat it as such. We will not be entering into any further correspondence with you regarding the provision of copy agreements.

.......

 

They go on to warn about using the services of a claims management company

 

They finish off with a statement of account.

 

I'll endeavour to get everything to scanned and uploaded, but in the meantime I would welcome any advice on what I do next.

 

I also received a call from Lifestyle Claims today asking if I was interested in them representing me. They were asking for £200 + VAT. Does anyone have any experience of them?

Edited by pin1onu

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is about 9 years ago so I think it is probably statutue barred to seek re-dress.

 

 

Don't think it is. I think it's 6 yrs from when you discover that there's a problem (unless you're saying you stopped paying 9 yrs ago. Have you ever complained about the PPI before?

 

SAR would be a good move if you're going to manipulate yourself into a position to defend based on charges and/or PPI.

 

M

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...