Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

kennythecelt V Central Capital Ltd PPI Reclaim (other names Central Trust PLC/ Debtbuster Loans)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5020 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Round 2 of PPI reclaim.

 

This time it will not be so easy, having read threads on CAG, before posting this. However, I hope I can pick up on some of the issues others had difficulty with, and hopefully, give others who have had PPI policies with these companies a helping hand.

 

Fortunately, I have a lot of information to go on, as a result of SAR requests related to past bank charge reclaims.

 

Story so far:

 

Central Trust PLC arranged a joint secured loan during December 2000. They arranged this loan with Endeavour Personal Finance Ltd, an HSBC company, based iat Beneficial House, Easthampstead Rd, Bracknell, RG12 1NS.

 

Loan Details

 

Advance, £14,000

PPI single payment policy £3640

 

Total £17,640

 

APR 12.9%

 

 

I had pursued Endeavour regarding the mis-selling of PPI and they said that Central Capital Ltd are responsible for the PPI sale and any reclaim, which I kind of accept.

 

I have the Credit agreement- an actual original- which is a first for me.

 

I have a record of all transactions on the account and the account no which is settled in full and never defaulted- no issues there. The account settled during mid 2003.

 

The following letter has today been drafted and sent to Central Capital Ltd, based on my letter in another PPI thread, kennythecelt V Bank of Scotland Credit Care Bronze:

 

 

Central Capital Ltd xxxxxx 2010

The Complaints Department

Melton House

65-67 Clarendon Rd

Watford

Herts

WD17 1BL

 

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Mr and Mrs kennythecelt

 

Present Address for correspondence:

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Previous Address of Account:

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your group of companies ie Central Trust PLC and Debtbuster Loans, acted as a credit broker for ourselves and arranged a secured loan with Endeavour Personal Finance.

 

The loan and account details are as follows:

 

Loan amount: £14,000

Single sum payment protection insurance policy: £3,640,

Total loan amount: £17,640

APR: 12.9%

Repayment period: 120 months

Advance date: xxxxxxx

Settlement date: xxxxxxxx

Account No: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

A copy of the credit agreement with Endeavour Personal Finance is attached for your information.

 

I also attach a copy of the historical transactions on the account with Endeavour Personal Finance, for your information, which I have received from them.

 

I believe I have been mis-sold a payment protection insurance policy (PPI), by you and I would like to request a full refund of my premiums, plus interest that I paid on that sum ie 12.9% plus compensatory interest at 8%. This loan has since been repaid in full by me, before the due settlement date.

 

I have been in contact with Endeavour Personal Finance regarding the mis-selling of PPI and they have referred me to you.

 

I do not believe being forced to buy this policy as part of the loan was a fair and reasonable obligation upon me as I did not need this insurance and I did not want it.

 

Please note that the reason you arranged this loan on our behalf was to consolidate our finances. This means that you would be aware that I had financial difficulties at the time and could therefore not afford the luxury of a worthless Payment Protection Insurance policy paid up front with interest at 12.9% added for the privilege.

 

The policy was mis-sold to me because:

 

• It was sold as a condition of the loan being made available to me.

• I had pre existing medical conditions which would have meant that I would not have been able to make a claim for those conditions. In effect, the policy was useless to me.

• I did not see the policy in advance of signing the agreement to make myself aware of its terms and conditions, as you did not make me aware of them. In fact, I don't recollect ever seeing a full policy document and have no idea who you arranged this policy with- perhaps you can supply a copy of the terms and conditions of the policy document.

• The policy was a lump sum prepaid policy and I had to pay you interest for that policy for the period of the loan. This was not explained to me. I was also not given the cheaper option of a monthly PPI policy, which would not have accrued interest over the duration of the policy and which would have been easier to cancel. It is not easy to cancel a prepaid policy as it is paid up front.

The FSA has recommended the end of single payment PPI policies due to the number of instances of mis-selling.

• The monthly payments to Endeavour Personal Finance would have been considerably less and more manageable to me, if I was not sold the policy and related interest and instead sold a monthly policy.

• I was not asked by you if I had other insurances/ policies or financial measures in place which could provide me with cover if I needed it or the means to repay the loan amount.

• I was not offered a choice of market placed products, but directed to a policy which you provided me with. Presumably, you had a business interest for doing so and I would like to know what this was please.

• You did not take steps to ensure that the policy was in my/ our best interests. You did not make a comparison of products for my individual circumstances.

• You did not inform me that you would make commission from the sale of the policy to me or what the commission was. Can you please tell me commission you received.

• At the time of entering into the agreement with you, I was employed by xxxxxxxxxx Council as was my wife. You were aware of these facts as you sought references to process the loan and PPI. As we were employed in Local Authorities, in the event that we had an illness during the period of the loan and PPI policy, both my wife and I would have been provided with sickness pay for a 12 month period (6 months at full pay) which was better than the policy you provided me with. We also had superannuation scheme membership.

• At the time of the policy being sold to me, we were at no risk of redundancy as we were employed in local government. The only type of redundancy would have been voluntary and the terms of voluntary redundancy would have been very favourable and enough to repay the loan. Consequently the PPI policy you sold me as a condition of the loan was worthless.

• I believe that you have recently reviewed your policy on sales of PPI due to recommendations from the FSA due to complaints about circumstances such as mine.

• These policies were recommended to clients such as me by your sales staff who were on commission as part of their salary and conditions of service and I was not made aware of this by you or the salesperson, who I assumed to be a member of staff not motivated by sales but with my best interest at heart, as a consumer.

 

I now respectfully ask that you investigate the selling of the policy to me and make arrangements for full repayment of the policy amount and all interest on the policy (at fixed rate of 12.9%) that I have paid to you until the loan was settled. In addition to that sum, I require interest at 8% on the combined sum above, from the date of the loan agreement and PPI until you settle this claim with me.

 

If I do not receive a favourable response from you I will pursue this claim through the Financial Ombudsman Service and I am prepared to seek legal redress, for which I would claim costs and time in full.

 

I appreciate that you will claim a lack of available data, but, I have supplied these to you, to help you make your enquiries.

 

I expect this issue to be resolved within 14 days please.

 

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

 

Mr and Mrs kennythecelt

Edited by kennythecelt
Link to post
Share on other sites

This post will be developed to calculate the potential refund, and I will be grateful for help. I will link to the interest calculator.

 

A refund of PPI amounting to £700 has been made to me by Endeavour for early settlement, so I can't claim for that.

 

The PPI amount to be reclaimed is £2936.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Issues I will encounter are:

 

 

 

  • PPI claim dates from 2000, way to old- but we know better.
  • Central Capital Ltd were not regulated by FSA at time. They appear to have been self regulated by FISA- Financial Industry Standards Association.
  • Lack of paperwork, files, telephone recordings etc
    I was aware of policy and implications and entered into it willingly.
  • A blank no and refusal to answer further correspondence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Following Patricks advice, I am now ripping up my letter and will use the standardised claim process and forms which the Financial Ombudsman Service have produced and made available

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi.html. That seems like an incredibly straightforward process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

best way they now have to comply, ime sending one to HFC who have tried to get me to fill in a form that is self defeating by that i mean it ask's you to answer trick questions that mean different things to different people ...

so i wrote to the FSA and FOS and said as much in my letter to them that i did not like their reply could they give me a definitive answer, and that is what i got the link above lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...