Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see that at the start of your thread you said they hadn't sent a Letter of Claim.  And in fact in all the uploaded material there is no LoC.  This is great news.  Even were you to lose - you won't - the judge would chop off a chunk of the money for their non-respect of PAPLOC. However, I'm a bit confused as you've named the file name as a SAR.  Are you sure about this?  Did you send any other letters apart from the one dx advised which was a CPR request (not a SAR) to DCBL (not Group Nexus).  I'm not being pernickety, this will be important for your Witness Statement further down the line.
    • I didn’t say it wouldn’t. That is not the issue here. To continue driving after the licence has expired (under s88), the driver must have submitted a “qualifying application”.  An application disclosing a relevant medical condition (of which sleep apnoea is one) is not a “qualifying application”, This means the driver cannot take advantage of s88 and must wait for the DVLA to make its decision before resuming driving.   The driver’s belief is irrelevant. The fact that a licence was eventually granted may mitigate the offence, but does it does not provide a defence.   But this driver didn’t meet the conditions. I explained why in my earlier post. He only meets the conditions if his application does not declare a relevant medical condition. His did.   As I explained, after his birthday he did not hold a licence that could be revoked.   In my view it doesn’t matter what it says. The offence is committed because his application declared a medical condition. Meanwhile his licence expired and s88 is not available to him. The GP letter would form part of the material the DVLA would use to complete their investigations. But until those enquiries are completed he could not drive.   The offence does not carry points or a disqualification (because a licence could have been held by your father). It only carries a fine and the guideline is half a week’s net income. If he pleads guilty that fine will be reduced by a third. He will also pay a surcharge of 40% of that fine. But the big difference is prosecution costs: a guilty plea will see costs of about £90 ordered whilst being convicted following a trial will see costs in the region of £600.
    • I'd recommend getting a new thread started about this. Let us help!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

If you opt out of the EU WTD do the rest periods still apply ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5051 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

When my brother joined his company brother has signed an opt out statement to opt out of the WTD.

The company now has everyone is consultation over working hours, on call, core hours and rest periods.

Does opting out of the WTD mean that you opt out of the right to 11 hrs continuous rest etc, or do these opt outs only apply to the 48 hour average working week ?

 

My understanding is that it is only the 48 hour bit that you opt out of and the stuff covered by The Working Time Regulations 1998 still apply :

  • A rest period of not less than eleven consecutive hours in each 24-hour period during which he works for his employer.
    A rest break when the day is longer than six hours
  • A minimum of one rest day per week


  • The statutory right to four weeks holiday


  • Night working must not average out at more than eight hours at a stretch


  • Workers will be entitled to a free health check-up before being employed on night work and at regular intervals thereafter


Can anyone clarify for me please ?

 

 

Thanks in advance.

 

M.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you opt-out of the 48 hour limit, the other provisions you stated do still apply.

Though, there are so many 'ifs and buts' if you read through the Act, that an employer can all but always get round them.

For example, if he is a 'shift worker' (what does that mean??), he could finish one shift at midnight, then due to a change of shift pattern be required to recommence work at, say, 6am.

The large print giveth, the small print taketh away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i opted out of the WTD.

my company operate a 24hr operation which means i work a three shift pattern. 0600-1400 1400-2200 2200-0600.

my pattern runs as follows.....7 days on 3 off, 7 days on 4 off. every 3rd weekend is a long weekend off ie friday saturday sunday monday.

overtime can include a 0600 start, and finish at 2200 and then start again at 0600 the next day, or indeed any comblnation of all three.

 

there is nothing that says we have to have an 11hr rest period between shifts.

as i understand, a 10hr rest period is what i opted out of.

 

working 7 days on may sound alien to a lot of people, but, if i was to suggest to the people i represent that we were going back to a 5 day pattern, they would slaughter me. if you think about it, people on a five day week would have to take 10 days leave for two weeks leave, whereas i take 7 days leave for 2 weeks leave.

 

sorry to rattle on.

 

hope this helps,

 

bartymuv.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Workers cannot opt out of rest entitlements. Depending on the nature of the job, breaks can be moved, but the employer must give compensatory rest to make up for the time lost when you would otherwise have had a break.

 

The only way to opt out of rest entitlements is through a collective agreement, not by individual opt-out.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sidewinder is of course absolutely right.

 

i should have said 'we' opted out as a whole section, not me as an individual.

 

on the other hand, we have opted out of having a meal break during a shift, and for that we get to leave an hour and a half early ie. 1230 instead of 1400. this suits us and of course the business.

there is a tea break incorporated in that period as well, 30 minutes.

 

we love it! lol.

 

bartymuv.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sidewinder is of course absolutely right.

 

i should have said 'we' opted out as a whole section, not me as an individual.

 

on the other hand, we have opted out of having a meal break during a shift, and for that we get to leave an hour and a half early ie. 1230 instead of 1400. this suits us and of course the business.

there is a tea break incorporated in that period as well, 30 minutes.

 

we love it! lol.

 

bartymuv.

 

Collective agreements can sometimes work quite well, but the WTD is an absolute nightmare to administer as there are so many clauses and exceptions. My last job was with a mainly nigh time distribution operation and the introduction of WTD cause serious problems - not to mention loss in income - for some of the staff who had previously worked 7 days a week on straight through shifts from 10pm to 7am.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i opted out of the WTD.

my company operate a 24hr operation which means i work a three shift pattern. 0600-1400 1400-2200 2200-0600.

my pattern runs as follows.....7 days on 3 off, 7 days on 4 off. every 3rd weekend is a long weekend off ie friday saturday sunday monday.

overtime can include a 0600 start, and finish at 2200 and then start again at 0600 the next day, or indeed any comblnation of all three.

 

there is nothing that says we have to have an 11hr rest period between shifts.

as i understand, a 10hr rest period is what i opted out of.

 

working 7 days on may sound alien to a lot of people, but, if i was to suggest to the people i represent that we were going back to a 5 day pattern, they would slaughter me. if you think about it, people on a five day week would have to take 10 days leave for two weeks leave, whereas i take 7 days leave for 2 weeks leave.

 

sorry to rattle on.

 

hope this helps,

 

bartymuv.

Hi,

Thanks for that. There is no shift work.

There are "core hours" 7am to 7pm and we are to arrange to cover these hours. Our problem lies in when we are on standby.

We understand "on standby" doesnt count towards the working hours. However, when we are called out the clock starts again.

Our quibble is over the 11hrs continuous rest period afterwards which they company they will allow us, but at " a time that is convenient to the business".

Which means you could be on standy at the weekend, be called out and work say 20 hours over the weekend, finishing say at midnight Sunday, but still be expected at work at 7am if you are covering the early part of the core hours................

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...