Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • don't get too hung up on the real meaning of 'fake' in terms of the documents a claimant might produce relating to a potential court claim. by fake we typically mean, they are not obviously the 'real McCoy' ,100% associated with whatever credit they are trying to pin on punters. they are often of the right 'version' that an OC would have used for that particular take out date, but with details inserted in a diff font where they should be for say your name address DOB etc. All DCA's typically  have filing cabinets covering each year for most creditor, whip 'em out, scan and copy n paste your details onto them, even easier now with online sign ups. no hard copies ever sent cause 90% of mugs have lost them..... one of our most powerful tools is the fact any docs they produce, unless they state they are 'a reconstruction'  MUST come from the original creditor noty some hidden pile the claimants have. Link are absolute masters at this so dont stick to lowell threads. dx    
    • Driving home last night I contacted wing mirrors with a car coming the opposite way. The wing mirror folded in and the glass popped out. Very minor damage.  I stopped at the next layby (A road) to repair the mirror. A passerby stopped and said they saw the other car stopped behind me in another layby - they went back and passed over details so we could get in touch.  The conversation started cordially, but quickly got heated when I said I was well on my side and they drifted over (which is what happened).  I wasn't going to bother filing a claim as there isn't enough damage to justify it. So I've said to the other party lets just call it quits as there are no witnesses and we both think we are innocent.   they said they are contacting the police and insurance and that they have witnesses. But a quick facebook search found a post by the other person saying they were in a crash, and were 'spun' off the road. Picture of a broken wing mirror and a slight scuff on the front and rear wheel arch. they are asking for witnesses. I have screenshots of the post, and sent them another message saying I can see you dont have witnesses as you are appealing for them. I'd really not drag this out. Lets call it quits and move on. this was followed by a couple of messages that didn't really make much sense. e.g. 'do the right thing'. What should I do now?  Contact police?  Contact my insurance? - Can I tell them about this incident but say I dont want to claim? Will that affect my premium?  
    • So this is the crux of the argument. The scrappage contribution should have also been counted as a deposit. It was literally a part exchange in return for a cash deduction so there is no reason it wouldn't be treated the same way.  I did not request a VT, I was struggling to pay after a separation from my partner at the time. However had the figures been reflected correctly, the VT cost would have been 2k not 9k and I may have considered it as an option. Instead, the car was marked stolen and removed from my possession by the police
    • LOL - old one the fiver theory - although with the poops its take a fiver now, promise 10p  sometime in the future while claiming the reverse theory   So when is jenrick, an apparent slam dunk as referenced higher in the thread, being referred to the police? These poops need to know that anything they throw will be returned .. with interest  
    • Yup, it isn't a criminal case, it's hard to prove, but take a detailed look at my thread to see how many holes there are in what they have sent me, there is a picture building.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pls help I'm submitting my claim!


leamarie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6298 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone!

 

Sorry this is abit overdue but been really busy at work lately!

 

Here is my timeline so far as promised:

 

20th June Data Protection Act Subject Access Request Letter sent

 

8th July Reminder letter sent to advise they only have 23 days left in which to comply

 

17th July Statements received

 

26th July Preliminary letter sent

 

29th July Acknowledgement letter received to say investigating complaint from Tracy White, Customer Service Officer

 

9th August Fobb off letter received 'This is the bank's final response etc. etc,' sent from Musarat Siddique, Customer Service Officer.

 

10th August Letter before action sent

 

25th August 2nd fob off letter received. 'Since the banks final response has been issued, I must advise you that we will not be entering into any further correspondence regarding the point you have raised.' Jamie O'Neill, Assistant Manager

 

8th September Claim issued at local county court

 

10th September Claim deemed served

 

15th September Lloyds filed an acknowledgement of service

 

8th October 28 days from date deemed served, TIME UP!

 

Not really sure what to do now, I've heard that it can take a little loionger than the 28 days sometimes, so I guess I'll just hang on.

 

Off on holiday on wednesday, was really hoping to get the Allocations Questionnaire before then. Any handy hints to fill that out would be appreciated!

 

Bye for now ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

Well I am back from my holidays and have found the allocations questionnaire waiting for me. It has to be returned by friday with a £100 fee. Computer at home has just decided to give up the ghost, so will have to rely on completing it in my lunch hour using the guidance notes given here, hoping its not too complicated and that I can get it done in time!!! :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been checking the guidance notes and it turns out that I have the wrong form, I have the N150 instead of the N149, phoned the court and I am going to pop up there in my lunch break to collect one. Looks slightly easier.

 

Any ideas for what can be written in section G other information? Should I just state what I have done before e.g believe that the charges are unlawful etc. or do you think that because I have said this already in the claim I should leave this section blank. In other words am I best to reiterate the main points or skip that section?

 

Please help :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could argue for standard disclosure:

 

I am respectfully requesting that my claim be allocated to the small claims track.

 

This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the Defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their actual costs and I am surprised the Defendant did not counterclaim for these, because I would have paid them without argument.

 

However, the continuing problem is, (in common with the 100s of other cases currently being brought by other bank customers), that the banks refuse to reveal the details of their penalty-charging regime. As the banks have a fiduciary duty towards their customers, they have a duty to deal straightforwardly and in utmost good faith.

 

Accordingly, I would respectfully ask that the court in this case, not withstanding allocation to the small claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in the courts discretion to do so. This would bring a rapid end, not only to this litigation, but would also likely bring an end to much of the litigation in progress against other high-street banks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Michael, have used that text and ready to take my questionnaire back to the court this lunchtime.

 

Received Lloyds questionnaire yesterday and they asked for me to send a copy of mine to them directly. There are no instructions from the bank telling me to do this. Will ask them later.

 

Lloyds also stated they will not be available for the entire months of October and November, surprise, surprise!!! Does anyone know whether the court can override this or will I now have to wait until December?

 

Bye for now ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

forgot to say yesterday that Lloyds stated on their allocation questionnaire that they are requesting a stay and will not be available for court for October or November. When I asked the lady at the court office about this, she said not to worry as they are setting court dates for small claims now for FEBRUARY!!! She said they have a huge backlog. Is this normal, has anyone else had to wait this long and should I bother asking for the stay to be removed if its going to take ages to get a court date anyway?

 

Thanks again ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Thank you for providing me with a copy of your completed N149 Allocation Questionnaire, which I received on **/**/**.

 

Referring to the Allocation Questionnaire, I must admit to being somewhat surprised by your response to Section A (Settlement). You have ticked ‘yes’, thereby requesting a one month postponement in proceedings in order that a settlement may be reached by way of negotiation.

 

Please note that throughout the process of this claim, neither yourselves nor your client have ever given any indication whatsoever that you wish to settle this matter without the need for litigation. In fact, all my previous attempts at dialogue with your client have been met with outright refusals to negotiate this matter, and on **/**/** I received a letter from Lloyds TSB’s service recovery centre which explicitly stated that the bank had issued its final response and therefore would not enter into any further correspondence. It is for this reason that I felt I had no alternative but to seek redress by way of Court action.

 

Having said the above, I do believe that litigation should always be a last resort and would of course be happy to settle this matter without the need for a court hearing. Please be advised though, that I am completely confidant in the strength of my claim and believe that your clients charges could indeed be proved to be unlawful penalty’s which you are trying to cloak as contractual service charges. For this reason, I will only settle for the full amount of the claim, namely £***.

 

In light of your indication of your intention to negotiate settlement, I will await your communication informing me of how you wish to proceed. A copy of this letter will also be sent to the court.

 

 

Yours faithfully

 

You're welcome to send this if you like. If you do, send a copy to the court as well. Even if it does'nt get them to settle, at least it puts you on the moral high ground and you'll be able to demonstrate to the court that you've tried to negotiate with them.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Gary!

 

That is absolutely brilliant!!! Fantastic letter. Was going to send my AQ to their solicitors today so will send this with it.

 

Can I just take a copy to the court to be added to my file even though I've already submitted my AQ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No probs. Yes, send it or take it to the court and request that its added to your file.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought - should you send that letter only if you have received the SCM AQ?

 

Personally I would wait until I had received the SCM AQ .. thats assuming I do of course, not sure if everyone gets it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes!! Its only to be used as a response to their A/Q when you receive it from them. And then only if they have ticked 'yes' to a one month postponement in section A (which they have always done till now).

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gary,

 

Just typing up that fab letter and got a bit stuck. When I say 'I will only settle for the full amount of the claim, namely £ ' , do I put the total amount including court costs paid and interest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

Could someone please help, I have one more question.

 

Nearly finished writing this letter but when I say I will only settle for the total amount of the claim, interest and court costs, do I include the interest accumalated since my claim was issued? If so do I need to phrase it something like 'total amount of the claim, court costs and ongoing interest until date of judgement or settlement, namely £_'.

 

I want to make sure I claim for all the interest as its already £20 extra and if it continues until February/March that will be a tidy sum!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes thats fine, or something like "plus interest accrued since date of issue, £***"

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi everyone, good news...

 

I HAVE RECEIVED A COURT DATE!!! 23RD FEBRUARY!

 

 

I know its ages away but just think of all that interest accruing! :D

 

I guess all I do now is wait. I think I was supposed to give my claim details to a moderator. Not sure how to do it. Does PM mean private message?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, send a private message to a mod with all the claim details and they will include it in the litigation in progress section.

 

Have you received any directions from the court yet? If not that will be the next stage. You will be instructed to provide the court and the other side with all your documents and the evidance on which you will rely. Even if you have'nt had directions as yet, it would still be a good idea to start getting prepared. In the templates library you'll find a 'court bundle' which contains most of what you need. Add to that the McNamara interview, a shedule and your statements and any correspondance between you and Lloyds.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Gary.

 

Yes I think I have received the directions with the court date, it just said to submit any evidence to the court and the defence 14 days before. I think I thought I just had to organise all the written correspondence between myself and the bank.

 

Thanks for the prompt!!!

 

Leamarie ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you mind scanning or otherwise posting up your directions please? Just want to check exactly what you will need to submit.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...