Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • An update! I emailed both Andrzej.Tuleja and James_Goldsmith at Whirlpool dot com. I got a phone call from their executive team a couple of days later, and a replacement part dropped on the mat a week after. She was quite apologetic, however, also reiterated the "90 day warranty" period on customer fitted parts, and did not comment when I mentioned that the CRA also applies as I was a consumer buying from them directly. So I now have a spare door switch if the machine decides to eat another in the future! Cheers all!   Note dx100 that the "Hotpoint CEO" you linked to is not related to the hotpoint appliances, but some kind of marketing app.
    • yep, throw that morality card out the window....9/10 you never owe a DCA ANYTHING!! they are NOT BAILIFFS!!
    • (See the link to DVLA’s INF188/6 document I posted above, page 4 as cited) “I have a new medical condition that I have told the DVLA about on my recent application. Can I drive? As soon as the DVLA receives your correct and complete application for a new licence and as long as you meet all the Section 88 criteria, you may drive. It is important that you are satisfied that the medical condition you have declared on your application does not stop you from driving. If you are unsure, check with your doctor or healthcare professional before you make a decision. You can also look up your condition in the ‘Assessing fitness to drive’ guide, which you can find at www.gov.uk/dvla/fitnesstodrive to see whether you meet the medical standards for driving. As this guide is intended for healthcare professionals, it can be complicated. Your doctor or healthcare professional should be able to help you if necessary." It seems that DVLA think that S.88 does apply for applications disclosing a new medical condition after all. Why might this be so, and what of “qualifying application" and "relevant disability"? S. 92(1) imposes on the driver a requirement to disclose a relevant disability. S.92(3) requires the Secretary of State to refuse such an application disclosing a relevant disability ….. EXCEPT S.92(4) requires the Secretary of State to grant such an application if the relevant disability is “adequately controlled”. Hence my belief S.88 can apply for medical conditions (if the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive) as the application remains a qualifying application IF the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive, until DVLA (on behalf of the Secretary of State) say it doesn’t, provided the driver believes they meet the (medical) standard. Additionally, at (or before) June 2013 (as noted in my previous post) the medical standard for fitness to drive for conditions involving excessive daytime sleepiness was changed from “completely controlled” to "adequately controlled".  
    • CFO Bill Guan allegedly led a team at the news outlet that was behind a global money laundering scheme.View the full article
    • Anyway, I've asked my Booking.com flat-rent-out-bloke what needs to be done on the Booking.com portal to cancel a reservation. I got a late message "I'll let you know tomorrow".
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

unregistered electricity meter crunch time- advice needed!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5092 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I posted on here a while ago about my unregistered electricity problem. I received some very helpful replies and was able to work out what I think the problem was. I am renting a flat in a block of four flats and although there are four meters all with MPAN numbers, none are registered to the individual flats. Consequently I've never received a bill (moved in 2005) neither had the outgoing tenant. It's most likely a case of an unregistered supply (ie no meter registered to my flat) or simply slack billing by the supplier.

 

I am now about to move out and am not sure whether to flag this problem up or not. I feel I have two choices of how to deal with the situation and I'd really appreciate anyone's advice.

 

 

Choice 1.

I can say nothing and move out. The supplier has no record of me being there. Whenever the new tenants move in they will presumably start a new account. Does anyone know if this will be a 'fresh' account- or will they have to go into the whole history of the current unregistered supply? (where it will could all unravel.)

 

Choice 2.

I can flag it with the company that deals with the flat now and say,'look, I've been organising final utilities and just making sure we are both clear that there is no electricity bill. They may well say, no this isn't right, and we will have to try work out the mess between us (and yes, I may well get a big bill.)

 

The BIG but is that I will most likely have to provide final readings when I move out and I cant do this. I could take a reading from what I think is my meter and leave that, but if i have to show a final bill as well then I'm stuffed. All | can think to do is plead ignorance and explain that the previous tenant told me there was no electricity bill (this is true, it's what he told me) and I (perhaps ignorantly) never questioned that. There is also the question of what happened when the last tenant moved out- didn't anyone want to see his final readings? And why didn't the landlord set the supply up properly in the first place?

 

For me though, the question is whether I deal with this now openly and say look, what's the situation here, or move out and wait and see taking a more ignorance is bliss stance.

Any advice is gratefully appreciated. I move out on Saturday and have a inventory check on this place a week later. It feels like crunch time..

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your meter genuinely isn't registered on ECOES - a website with all meters in, then if you give any supplier your details and a reading, they will only charge you from that reading, not back-bill you.

 

If you want to PM me your meter number I can check... By doing a "load test" - switching the supply off at the meter and checking whether you have electricity, you will be able to confirm which is yours

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your meter genuinely isn't registered on ECOES - a website with all meters in, then if you give any supplier your details and a reading, they will only charge you from that reading, not back-bill you.

 

If you want to PM me your meter number I can check... By doing a "load test" - switching the supply off at the meter and checking whether you have electricity, you will be able to confirm which is yours

 

thanks. Someone else checked ECOES and what comes up is the four meters in the building all listed at the same address- which is the address of the whole building. But there is no mention of flat1, flat 2 etc.(four flats in the building.) To check which is my meter, i was going to switch off the mains in my flat at the fuse box and see which meter stops, i didn't want to accidently switch of someone else's supply (i take it it's safe to do this?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i've done what i felt was the right thing and talked this through with the landlord. there is indeed a problem- most likely no account was ever set up with the supplier. if i end up having to pay for the entire time of my tenancy (last five years) does anyone know how this is done (an estimate i guess) and how i can make sure it's done fairly and i only have to pay for the time i've been in the flat?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...