Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • might be best to start a new thread as its one of 5 you have?  
    • @jk2054 - I haven't started a claim with OIC or MIB yet, due to being unable to obtain the name of the other driver.  @BankFodder cheers for that, I'll go back to them with this info & update on here when I've had a response.
    • Andy thanks for your reply. No i am now being evicted from the house i moved into after that previous post. The letting agent lied to me when they said the landlord would not be selling the house. SHe did not mention that the landlord tried to sell the house last year, i was not told this, 4 months into the tenancy i got the eviction notice. Its obvious they lied to me and used me to fill in the gap between their attempts to sell the house. I have filled in the defence form as it was easy to follow the old one from my previous post. I will post it later on in the hope someone can give it the once over. It has to be in by the end of this month may 31st.  
    • It's a GR Yaris - Finance is with Alphera, who are part of BMW I believe. I'm sure the unit is very expensive to repair, I have even told them I would be happy with a refurbished/reconditioned unit, in trying to be reasonable as well.
    • Without seeing this envelope, document and sticker it is impossible to advise properly. However, just going on what you have told us, there are two ways you can deal with this: !. The easy way. This has the lowest risk but the guarantee of a penalty for speeding.  You can respond to the SJPN by pleading “Not Guilty” to both charges. In the “Reasons for pleading Not Guilty” box you can explain that you responded to the request for driver’s details but it was recently returned to you, seemingly not actioned. However, you are willing to plead guilty to the speeding charge providing, and only providing, the “Fail to Provide Driver's Details" (FtP) charge is dropped. You could also ask the court to consider sentencing you at the fixed penalty level (£100 and 3 points) as this prosecution seems to be the result of an administrative problem outside your control. 2. The not so easy way with higher risk. This could see you convicted of the FtP charge but has the possibility that you escape with no penalty whatsoever. You can do the same – plead not guilty to both charges. If you go down this route the speeding charge cannot succeed as they have no evidence you were driving. This comes from your response to the request for driver’s details which the police say they have not got. You can mention in the “Reasons” box that you returned the request for driver’s details as required. You will then face a trial for the FtP charge and you can produced your response together with the envelope and sticker showing it had been returned to you. The risk with this is that if your defence fails you will be fined a week and a half’s net income, pay a “Victim Surcharge” of 40% of the fine, pay prosecution costs of around £650 and have six points together with an endorsement code (MS90) which will see your insurance premiums rocket.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Southern pacific (SPML). Mortgage Late Payment Fees reclaiming


angnnig
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4430 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,SPML (CAPSTONE) have recently tried to evict us from our home ,which we narrowly escaped.*see my other thread on here*.They are trying it on again.They now are saying that we owe £35 on top of our £3,400 in arrears and that we are in breach of the suspended repo order on us.We dont know were this £35 has come from as we are paying the agreed monthly amount on time.We have worked out that they owe us £4351.73 in charges this includes adminlink3.gif fees,arrears managment fees ,interestlink3.gif on arrears fees,litigation fees ,early statement fees and legal costs.We have now had enough of these threats from them and are considering taking them to court to try and get the repo order on us lifted on the grounds that capstone owe us more in unlawfull fees than we owe them in arrears,but we are wary of doing this as the court might not accept all the charges we are claiming are unlawfull and that thier could be a shortfall and we might still owe capstone.Any advice greatly appreciated ,thanks.regards angnnig

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 207
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

One question though when I spoke to Kensington they say the charges they are repaying only relate to people on 1st Charges not 2nd or 3rd charges on the house....... so extortionate charges become fair if they are not the 1st charge on a property ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi all,We are in the procces of claiming back all the unlawfull charges back from SPML .We have written to SPML and asked for the charges back and put our complaint to the FOS.SPML have sent us a letter back refusing to pay the £2,600 they owe us in Admin fees,arrears management fees ,interest on arrears fees ,early statement fees and the latest litigation managment fees.They have made a pathetic attempt to break down thier fees and offered to pay £100 of the £2,600.I know that we should now send the template letter back refusing this ,but we are unsure how to go about complaining to the FOS and how to word our letter to the FOS ,are thier any template letters for this .We even contemplated going down the court route but wouldn,t have a clue how to fill the court forms out .Any help would be appriciated ,thanks.regards angnnig

Edited by angnnig
Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to write back and accept the £100 as an interim payment.

The choice is yours whether to go down the FOS route or the court route.

I would personally prefer the FOS as they make a decision on what is fair and reasonable rather than any legal arguments, simply keep the wording simple and relavant.

The court route will be quicker than the FOS but is riskier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anngnig,

 

I have just received a substantial refund via the FOS route regarding mortgage arrears fees that I felt were unfair.

 

The FOS adjudicator saw that I was making payments regularly and stated that it was unfair of the mortgage company to debit arrears fees when I was plainly making a decent attempt to come out of arrears. They did not return specific charges like retuurned dd fees though.

 

If you want further info I can give you the exact wording of the FOS settlement letter, it may help with your form.

 

Cheers, BAE :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

This is the interesting part of the FOS Adjudicator's judgment which they sent to my mortgage lender, (who then had to either accept the FOS's conclusions or send further documentation etc to refute the findings. And yes,they accepted the Fos's conclusions):

 

I appreciate that an account in arrears requires further additional work to maintain it. However, I would expect to see evidence of this. Further, where it is clear that an individual has attempted to make payments and maintain them, then I believe it would be unreasonable to continue to levy charges.

 

This is just part of the 3 page conclusion the FOS made in my case.

 

Remember, even if they initially refuse your claim, you can disagree with their conclusion and ask them to examine it again.

 

The statement above, which states the mortgage lender needs to provide evidence that it costs xxxx amount to maintain an account in arrears, is very important. Has a financial institution ever provided such evidence??? - NOOOO!!!

 

Hope this helps.

 

BAE :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BAE,Thankyou for your message.I have sent in my complaint, but i haven,t sent in details of my payment history with spml to the FOS,do you think this would help if i did this.we have missed quite a few payments to SPML,but always caught them up apart from the main arrears,which now are the same amount as they owe us in charges,do you think i should also send copies of the charges that spml have done us for?Thankyou again .for your help x

Link to post
Share on other sites

i haven,t sent in details of my payment history with spml to the fos,do you think this would help

 

Hi,

 

Yes, it may help and can't do any damage!

 

Once you have received confirmation of the person who is dealing with your complaint at the FOS, you can simply forward the extra info onto them.

 

Stressing and showing the positive steps you took to come out of arrears can only add weight to your claim. If SPML charged you on months when you made payments you have a chance the FOS will make a favourable judgment on these charges.

 

BAE :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
You need to write back and accept the £100 as an interim payment.

The choice is yours whether to go down the FOS route or the court route.

I would personally prefer the FOS as they make a decision on what is fair and reasonable rather than any legal arguments, simply keep the wording simple and relavant.

The court route will be quicker than the FOS but is riskier.

 

Does anyone know what to put in a letter accepting the poxy payment they intially offer as an interim payment. i want to be careful not to say that I am accepting this a final payment and will pursue them for the rest of the fees.

We live in an unmoderated country why should the net be any different?

Bring back free speech we miss it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

We have finally had a reply from the FOS on the SPML charges and they have come to the conclusion that in thier opinion based on all the information we provided and SPML,s evidence,that they wont uphold our complaint against SPML and that they are well within thier rights to charge us all the fees they want to ,as we were aware that fees might be applied to our account if we fell into any arrears,The FOS are a waste of time in our opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm really not getting this.

 

KENSINGTON MORTGAGES were fined in April this year. FINED FOR UNFAIR CHARGES, HAS EVERYBODY CONVIENTLY FORGOTTEN THIS FACT.

 

The FSA stated that FEES WERE UNFAIR:

 

The lender imposed three types of fee that were unfair or excessive:

 

• a fee if someone's direct debit bounced, which was charged no matter how many times the direct debit had been bounced before

 

• a fee for three or more cancelled direct debits that was higher than the the real administrative cost incurred by the lender

 

• a fee for early repayment of a mortgage that was also levied on the accumulated arrears fees and charges that had been imposed on the borrower.

 

Check the posts BELOW 'the mortgage lender needs to provide evidence that it costs xxxx amount to maintain an account in arrears, Has the financial institution ever provided such evidence?

 

You need to push the mortgage company on this point £50 for bouncing DD are they seriious?

 

Look, even if they initially refuse your claim, you can disagree with their conclusion and ask them to examine it again.

 

This time post your arguments and let us help:sad:

We live in an unmoderated country why should the net be any different?

Bring back free speech we miss it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Umoderate,Thanks for your reply,unforunatly our scanner/ printer doesn,t work and we cant afford to replace it, so we cant post the reply the FOS has sent ,They have basically said that because we fell into financial hardship it is our fault and that SPML have done thier upmost best to try to help us and sent letters and tried to phone us which we have so called ignored.They also said that spml were well within thier thier rights to try and evict us twice ,because we didn,t keep to payment arrangements,Firstly we have always tried to keep in contact with SPML,mainly in writing because we dont trust a word they say on the phone,SPML even lied and told the FOS that we phoned them up once and said that we couldn,t afford to pay our mortgage due to the renovation of our house.I cant believe they can get away with blatent lies .spml also told the FOS that we said that we put on our original application form that we earned £41,500 from my partners self employed income,this is a blatent lie also,it isn,t anything near that.Thier is no mention from the FOS that the fees are exsessive ,they even seem to agree with SPML .They even stated in thier reply to us that "AS YOUR PAYMENT HISTORY DOES NOT SHOW YOU CONDUCTED THE ACCOUNT SATIFACTORILY ,MY VIEW IS THAT THE FEES HAVE BEEN APPLIED IN A FAIR AND REASONABLE MANNER ,YOUR ARREARS CONTINUED TO ESCALATE AND THE FEES WERE APPLIED BECAUSE THE ACCOUNT WAS IN ARREARS AND WARRANTED ADDITIONAL ADMINISTRATION ,I AM THEREFORE UNABLE TO RECOMEND A REFUND".the fos had no sympothy whatso ever for my partner being ill and that is why we fell into financial hardship which led to going into arrears with our mortgage.Any help with this would be greatly appriciated .The FOS have give us until the 16th of this month to give an explanation as to why we disagree and any additional evidence to support our case.regards angnnig

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is another path open to you and that is the court.

 

This does require a bit of work but gererally its a small amount and with the support on here is not a huge a task as you would think.

 

Its something I will probably have to do as myself.

 

This route has huge success based on the fact that a mortgage company defending action would have to produce an actual figure for the cost to them.

 

TO DATE NO MORTGAGE COMPANY HAS EVER STEPPED FOOT IN COURT TO PRODUCE ACTUAL COSTS OF FEES.

 

They usually bottle before this stage.

 

Please repost your problem on LEGAL

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?170-Legal-Issues

 

Good Luck

We live in an unmoderated country why should the net be any different?

Bring back free speech we miss it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Umoderate,Thanks for your reply,unforunatly our scanner/ printer doesn,t work and we cant afford to replace it, so we cant post the reply the FOS has sent ,They have basically said that because we fell into financial hardship
link3.gif
it is our fault and that SPML have done thier upmost best to try to help us and sent letters and tried to phone us which we have so called ignored.They also said that spml were well within thier thier rights to try and evict us twice ,because we didn,t keep to payment arrangements,Firstly we have always tried to keep in contact with SPML,mainly in writing because we dont trust a word they say on the phone,SPML even lied and told the FOS that we phoned them up once and said that we couldn,t afford to pay our mortgage due to the renovation of our house.I cant believe they can get away with blatent lies .spml also told the FOS that we said that we put on our original application form that we earned £41,500 from my partners self employed income,this is a blatent lie also,it isn,t anything near that.Thier is no mention from the FOS that the fees are exsessive ,they even seem to agree with SPML .They even stated in thier reply to us that "AS YOUR PAYMENT HISTORY DOES NOT SHOW YOU CONDUCTED THE ACCOUNT SATIFACTORILY ,MY VIEW IS THAT THE FEES HAVE BEEN APPLIED IN A FAIR AND REASONABLE MANNER ,YOUR ARREARS CONTINUED TO ESCALATE AND THE FEES WERE APPLIED BECAUSE THE ACCOUNT WAS IN ARREARS AND WARRANTED ADDITIONAL ADMINISTRATION ,I AM THEREFORE UNABLE TO RECOMEND A REFUND".the fos had no sympothy whatso ever for my partner being ill and that is why we fell into financial hardship which led to going into arrears with our mortgage.Any help with this would be greatly appriciated .The FOS have give us until the 16th of this month to give an explanation as to why we disagree and any additional evidence to support our case.regards angnnig

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have copies of the letters you wrote to SPML regarding the arrears ? - that will prove to the FOS you did communicate with them.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ellen ,Thanks for your reply.Unfortunatly i cant find any copies of the letters we sent to SPML apart from one,We lost some files and think they may have been in them.We are considering going to court but we are unsure of wether or not its worth carrying on with the FOS,any advice would be greatly appriciated,thanks regards angnnig

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...