Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • See what you think of the attached. I have to do some proofreading of an English grammar book for an Italian publisher this weekend - for money! - so I'm afraid corrections and suggestions will come in dribs & drabs.  I've totally knackered the layout, the numbering and the order of your Exhibits but there will be several versions done so don't worry about that ATM. Your arguments are superb. What is less superb is the way you jump from one to the other and back again, so I haven't changed your words, but I have moved the paragraphs around and given each section a heading. New bits are shown in red. Crossed out crossed out in black is something you've quoted from the government Code of Practice, but that has since been withdrawn so unfortunately that argument has to go. Your paras 7 & 8 don't harm your case but to me are waffle and can go.  Keeping the arguments clear & concise will always impress a judge. IMPORTANT - did you ever send Simple Simon a CPR request? Defendant's WS - version 2.pdf
    • Björn Ulvaeus appeared on stage in East Yorkshire at a conference held at the Bridlington Spa.View the full article
    • Hi Schipoo and thanks for the update. This is a brilliant result as rergards your fight with HMRC. If you can manage a Donation to the site, it would be greatly appreciated. Let us know how it goes as regards the fees being sought by Independant Tax.
    • A never ending torrent of **it Outrage as ‘tidal wave’ of sewage floods historic market town’s unique chalk river WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: Water firm pumps sewage into river Misbourne, Amersham on 21 ‘dry days’ during nearly five month period  
    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Enforcement Officer Home visit for LTD company debts - urgent advice please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5083 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks for this Ploddertom.

 

Although we are skint we are not entitled to a fee remission as we get child tax credit AND working tax credit! I have already looked into this for some other stuff!

 

Will put together a letter in the morning... getting to late for me now!

 

An N244 sounds like a solution as well but hopefully they will stop once they realise they are chasing an individual rather than a company.

 

Just one thing, do i mention my husband's name in this or just state they are going after the an individual instead of a company? If they come back and claim they CAN chase the director (possibly as per the terms and conditions that we no longer have) then we will have to think again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Just one thing, do i mention my husband's name in this or just state they are going after the an individual instead of a company? If they come back and claim they CAN chase the director (possibly as per the terms and conditions that we no longer have) then we will have to think again.

 

You probably will have to, I still think the most important factor here is your condition!

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The enforcer can only take action against the name on the court order. As it appears that the court order is not in your husband's or your name, as it does not appertain to your home address and as none of the items could possibly be associated with a limited company from another address, then this particular bailiff has no right to be anywhere near your property and certainly no right levy on anything there.

 

I expect he got the directors' names and home address from Companies House and knowing that there was no point in trying to levy against a defunct company, thought that he could short cut the system, not with the intention of 'justice' but so that he could act as a fraudulent bully and make personal gain through commission.

 

You can't stop an idiot with this kind on mentality arriving unannounced, but you can try one of two very effective methods to show him that his bully boy tactics won't work.

 

1) Don't open the doors but through an upstairs window use a two word communication which the second word is 'off'. Elaborate a little further by adding the word 'fraudster'.

 

2) Say nothing and simply stare hard and continuously at him through the window. Even the thickest finally get the message on that one.

 

Both methods show that you will not be intimidated, which of course is precisely what he trying to achieve.

 

Back to the drawing board for him which usually starts with him phoning the office and asking for advice and further instructions.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what i propose to send to the HCEO company today by recorded delivery:

 

I am writing with reference to visits made by your enforcement officer Mr xxxxx

 

The defendant in question is a Limited Company and as such is not related in any way to the address visited. I have no knowledge of the judgment that has been made against the company and am not aware of the debt you are attempting to collect upon.

 

None of the items that have been levied upon belong to the limited company in question and as such cannot be subject to a walking possession order. In particular one item listed – garden swing – is an item that belongs to my son and is for his exclusive use. All items within the property belong to private individuals and there are no assets of the limited company there.

 

I am pregnant and due to give birth any time in the next 4 weeks. The undue stress these visits are putting on me and my family is not healthy and as a vulnerable person identified within the national standards for enforcement agents I request that any further action is ceased.

 

I am not sure if this is strong enough to say f*** off to them! I have never been an officer of the company so can put my name to the letter without risk of them trying to come back at me.

 

I am happy to get a statutory declaration but have no idea of where to go to do this. I assume it could be done at any solicitor but the last time we used one was several years ago!! I also won't be able to do this until next week and would really like to get the letter in the post today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what i propose to send to the HCEO company today by recorded delivery:

 

I am writing with reference to visits made by your enforcement officer Mr xxxxx

 

The defendant in question is a Limited Company and as such is not related in any way to the address visited. I have no knowledge of the judgment that has been made against the company and am not aware of the debt you are attempting to collect upon.

 

None of the items that have been levied upon belong to the limited company in question and as such cannot be subject to a walking possession order.

 

As you never signed a Walking Possession you should address this as a "levy" instead. The chances are they will reply they can and it is up to the owner of the goods to claim and prove they own them.

 

In particular one item listed – garden swing – is an item that belongs to my son and is for his exclusive use. All items within the property belong to private individuals and there are no assets of the limited company there.

 

I am pregnant and due to give birth any time in the next 4 weeks. The undue stress these visits are putting on me and my family is not healthy and as a vulnerable person identified within the national standards for enforcement agents I request that any further action is ceased.

 

I am not sure if this is strong enough to say f*** off to them! I have never been an officer of the company so can put my name to the letter without risk of them trying to come back at me.

 

I am happy to get a statutory declaration but have no idea of where to go to do this. I assume it could be done at any solicitor but the last time we used one was several years ago!! I also won't be able to do this until next week and would really like to get the letter in the post today.

 

Stat Decs can be done at any solicitor/commissioner for oaths - approx £5/£10 you will need some extra notarised copies. As it involves County Court you can also have it done - usually for free - at your local County Court Office.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE!

 

Well it seems the enforcement company seem to be trying a different tack! Today my husband had a phone call at his office and on his mobile from Andrew Wilson and Co.

 

The previous business was an online retail store and the website has been continued with new owners, a new director and all new bank accounts. The ltd company name has been changed but the original website address and 0844 telephone number is still the same. There is nothing in the new company to link my husband to and he now works for a totally different company and is nothing to do with the new one. The company my husband now works for is however owned by the director that took over the website and it is run from the same office.... So this does complicate things although i don't think in a big way as they really are separate entities.

 

He ignored the call on his mobile but did speak to the person who called the office landline. He told them he didn't have any contact details for the director and they could just leave a message. He should have told them it was nothing to do with him but as he has a knowledge of someone chasing him he didn't think quickly enough on his feet. The voicemail he received is asking him to call them back with a proposal of how he plans to repay the debt!! He didn't give anything away but came home telling me he's going to call them back tomorrow.....

 

Just to clarify i assume he should do nothing and wait to see if anything turns up in the post? We really don't want any bailiffs turning up at the new office as there are several companies in there and no doubt they will hassle everyone they can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make no calls unless the conversation can be recorded. Answer any question with a question and neither confirm or deny who you are. They cannot discuss the debt with someone they can't confirm.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks! I have told him not to speak to anyone and NOT to call them back!

 

They are clutching at straws and of course will do anything they can to get the money back from whoever they can. As long as we stand firm then there is nothing they can do.

 

No mention has been made by them about a personal guarantee from the director (of the old company) so i am assuming this was not on the account forms/terms and conditions. They do know my husband was a director so would have expected them to go down that route if they could. Maybe they will work that out later! I have no idea how a personal guarantee works and as they have taken the company to court they may have to go back to the drawing board and take him to court as well? Seems an awful lot of effort for what was a £700~ debt!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...