Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The outlet is in Camden Town and was set up in 2006, a year after my husband established the business, in addition to selling at exhibitions, online, shows, events, and having licensing agreements in some places overseas.  The only thing I have stopped doing since I got ill is the physical stuff, which I’m working on. The business has not changed name or anything like that either. I’m not sure where the original contract with Camden is but the management must still have it. My husband died in Jan 2017, and until Sept 2018, I would take the stock in every week; after that I was sending it in by post. I went in now and then when possible to re-do the display but that was about it. No one had access to any files until 2020. Moved house in 2020 thought would have to pull it all, Covid had just hit as well. The person in question said he would be interested in taking over and paying the rent etc. so I said I would let him sell the pictures for nothing as long as he would ‘keep it warm’ for me.  Obviously, everywhere was closed for lockdown. During this time I was working out how to go forward.  In May 2022 I told him I couldn’t  give anything away for free anymore, and put in place the wholesale agreement.  I’ve disregarded any discrepancies from before this date. I sent over the jpgs electronically, so I’ve still got them too. He hasn’t got any original files like .psds negatives or memory cards etc, I’ve got proof of all ownership/copyright. A co-op is whereby a small number of neighbours work on a rotational basis so they each of them can have time off, that way everyone doesn’t need to be there at the same time, he had never been an employee of mine.  The only reason I allowed him to have the files in the first place as I didn’t want to lose that side of the business.  It’s a good, constant source of income. However, the rent was becoming crippling as I believed there was something fishy going on well before this as there’s so much cash dealt with there, and I couldn’t go in regularly in person, and I’m sure sales weren’t being recorded properly and cash was being pocketed. My husband was too busy to be doing any stock control properly, he wasn't really into paperwork, and the guy who was ‘helping’ me after my husband's death, was making things very difficult for me to implement a solid stock control system by refusing to co-operate on simple things like using email etc. which I thought was a smokescreen, so I severed ties with him just before I made the agreement in question. I sent about 100 images, jpg files, sent via We Transfer. I’ve got the confirmation of which files were sent with dates. I will have to go through closed bank accounts and previous tax returns to get a proper estimate.   Before I made this agreement, I was selling retail there, this is a wholesale agreement so I’ll have to do some calculations but it is definitely in the thousands.  I haven’t got his his home address, and I don't think he's got any sizeable assets. I’m also worried that he might send the files overseas and start selling them there. I know he’s not stupid enough to sell them online. He knows for sure how serious this is, but he’s been chancing it and thinks I’m stupid, if not soft and stupid. I don’t know if this would work but I am thinking that when he does contact me, I tell him we need to talk, tell him I know what he’s been up to, and strongly urge him not to order any more prints from wherever he is having them printed because it will make things much worse for him if he does. Then when I do tell him about the gravity of the situation, maybe a few days later, I think it will scare him into complying because the consequences definitely trump the few quid he thinks he is saving by getting his own printing done. Tell him an amount that I want back for lost revenue, and make it clear that if he doesn’t destroy the files and if I find out he is still doing it at any point down the line, I will seek prosecution for copyright infringement and fraud, which I will. I don’t know how I can enforce any of this without involving the courts though. I will be able to tell, though, and he will know this. And the only reason I am doing this now rather than before, is that I couldn’t prove anything until now.  It was screamingly obvious from the beginning though, as he wasn’t ordering enough from me to pay the rent, let alone make a profit. If I decided to come down like him lie a ton of bricks straight away, how would I go about a cease and desist, would I have to get one from the court? And what do I do about the stock he currently holds? It has also occurred to me that he might file for bankruptcy or similar if things get heavy, where would that leave me? I could put the feelers out for a brand-new person to take it on, obviously without giving them access to files, that is an option. But that comes with its own set of issues. Also, would there be any implications for me, if I kept quiet for now? Let him order again from me as if nothing has happened, as it will be any day and I want to get all my ducks in a row first ideally….   Thanks again
    • I’ve also just realised their online website they’ve got 12 photographs of my vehicle, including close ups of the inside?? Not sure why that’s relevant.  The time stamp on the first photo is 13:57, the PCN incident time is 14:12. 
    • I’m tempted to send a letter to the company outlining the reasons why I think their PCN is illegitimate. I guess will technically be an appeal.  Their documentation states they won’t discuss over phone, I also don’t want them to have my email address.    re signage on entrance, having looked at land registry, the whole road is private, and when you turn into the road off the highway, there is a sign on the lamppost about 20m in, again not noticeable and on the other side of the road.  I feel like I am in a difficult position with this, I understand that I may have a good chance of not having to pay, but at the same token the stress this is already causing me makes me feel like it’s not worth the £60!
    • Well done with the photo. Of course the signage is insufficient.  PPM are not interested in competent management of a car park, they are interested in catching drivers out so they can issue their PCNs. For a start, according to their trade associations' Codes of Practice, they are supposed to have signage at the entrance. Any e-mail reply from the company and whether they will/won't/can/can't get the invoice cancelled?    
    • I will annotate the message I sent for the forum.  Sorry, didn't see this straight away...
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

The politics thread, let's the argument begin!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5095 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wonder if there was an emergency General Election tomorrow, would we see the same result?

 

 

Them poor, poor deluded blinded people who knew we needed change. But voted for the worse.

 

Never mind (as my dad always said) Sh*t happens:confused:.

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm worried too. We both work and work for our business, so if business is bad (and we are in a recession) we have nothing to live on, and the cost of living has just gone up. That said, I do think it could have been worse, and I was expecting worse.

Mungy Pup

 

I want to live in a world where chickens are free to cross the road without their intentions being questioned. :razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the one which is really getting to me is the DLA one. If there was any doubt as to who they meant by "benefit scroungers", now we know. :mad: Every DLA recipient to go for a medical in 3 years time. Oh yeah, because ATOS is being such a grand success for IB/ESA, isn't it.... Well, from their point of view it is, of course, look at the number of people foun fit to work! :rolleyes: If they get the same success rate with DLA, wey-hey!!!

 

Hey, *rsehole! What part of "degenerative" do you not understand? Why do you think I have been awarded my DLA for LIFE? Isn't that clue enough? :mad:

 

And of course, that will happen just when my lovely son will be turning 16 and supposed to claim for himself as an adult. I might just make him fill in the forms himself and if they want him to have a medical, let him go in there by himself. That could be interesting. *evil chuckle*

 

Bear in mind that only a few months ago, when rumours flew of touching DLA, the grassroot revolt was at such level that ALL the parties swore that DLA was safe. Great, apparently, the benefit IS safe, only the claimants aren't. :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to see them take mine off me Bookie (DLA). If they dare to query my Doctor/Consultants diagnosis I will go to the press. I have been to hospital today for another cancer issue and am no awaiting an appointment at Christies....bloody barstewards :mad::mad::mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got my letter with my results from ATOS yesterday. (nil Poit). I will update my thread in the Benefits Forum just after the suicidal tendencies have disappeared (if they ever do). I am getting admitted to hospital tomorrow afternoon, just after I have been to see my GP (for the millionth time).

 

However, I did make the phone call to the cretins this morning and have told them that they have now got a huge fight on their hands.

 

They have told me instantly that I will still receive the buttons I get now until the matter is resolved one way or the other.

 

 

I wonder how many public sector workers will now (and I beleive they are entitled to) strike for being s**t on from a great height again?:mad:

 

(I'm as thick as pig s**t and twice as useless, but I seen this coming a mile away. Them poor deluded voters:confused:).

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The budget was dreadful and hits the vulnerable IMO.

 

I'm a public sector worker. There has been just a 1% increase in pay in the last two years. Public sector workers include nurses, firefighters, teachers etc.

 

I work in a school, in one of the most depraved areas of the country - am waiting for Cameron's promise of more funding for schools like mine. Won't hold my breath on this, because he's a liar and totally untrustworthy, similar to the other thing, Mr "No Scruples" Clegg who sold out for a bit of power.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well why is it they only tell you half of the story.

 

I remember Mr Clegg saying that the income tax threshold will be increased to £10,000 if he gets in.

 

Well today that is £2500 short.

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh and anyone that owes tax to the HMRC be on your guard as the government is sending in the DCA,s to collect it.

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back on the DLA thing (I have been stewing all day about it): Do people realise that DLA is NOT mean-tested? You can have a full-time job and still qualify, because unlike other benefits, it's the recognition that life for the disabled tends to be more expensive and that extra money is meant to get us on a more even keel.

 

There may be an argument for IB/ESA being tested (though not the way it is done, and not by ATOS, that's for sure). But DLA? That is really picking on the disability side of things, without the excuse of "helping" getting people back to work. :mad: :mad: :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think anyone who thinks it would have been much better if any other party was doing it is mad. They are all as bad as each other in my opinion, and anyone with half a brain knows that they say what they want to get in office and then they go back on everything they said. Sad, but true. Labour would have done just that too if they got in.

 

With the DLA thing, why have people who are disabled who do need help refused benefit, and then proceed to pay out to millions who don't need it on the basis that they should recieve money for having a child (child benefit)? I have to say though (sorry Bookie) but I do think that DLA should also be means tested. By that I don't mean to a silly ammount or to discriminate agianst those who earn, but I have personally known people who are claiming DLA when they were very, very well off and didn't need the money. They claimed because they could and because it was their right to. I do think it does need to change so that those who need it get it. Sadley, I don't think they will ever get it right, and it will always be the good honest folk who do need it that miss out.

Mungy Pup

 

I want to live in a world where chickens are free to cross the road without their intentions being questioned. :razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

In case anyone missed this little gem:

 

Chancellor George Osborne also made a personal pledge to Sir Martin Sorrell, the chief executive of the WPP advertising agency, to lure him back to Britain by abolishing a punitive overseas tax.

 

He said he plans to reverse a tax that allows the government to levy profits made by the foreign subsidiaries of British incorporated companies.

If I comment, I will get CAGbotted. :mad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so a vote for "pollitical reform" is looking likely for 5th May.

 

The choices are 1st past the post

(person with the most votes wins)

 

and Alternative Vote

(complex to explain clearly, I'm sure someone will clear up any mistakes I make :p

The candidates need over 50% of the votes to ber elected.

The person with the least votes gets to choose who the votes that went towards him go, and this goes up the ladder until a candidate has over 50%.

 

Start the discussion :D

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...