Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case  when he penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

old Barclaycard debt - HFO Services & a charging order


inacorner
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4646 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 243
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

thanks for quick reply

 

The details of charging order are

 

the order of 2006 stands

 

the interest of the edfendant in the asset described in the schedule stand charged with payment of the sum of xxx athe amount now owing under a judgement or orcer given on OCt 06 together with any further interest becoming due and xxx costs of the application

 

the cost to be added to the judgement debt

 

my application to pay by£5 month struck out

 

the original order of 2006 stated

 

I had to pay the claiment xxx for debt plus interest to date of judgement and xxx costs

 

in their original claime they stated

 

'The claimant also claims interest theron pursuant to S.69 of the County COurt Act 1984 at a rate of 8% a year from 3 February 2006 to 11 August 2006 of £304.00 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a rate of £1.60 per day'

 

and as I mentioned in an earlier post they appear to be charging this at 12% !! not 8%

 

I assume from reply they wont comply with the SAR - is this accptable?

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just noticed that in the letter received to day there is a differnce in the amount owing of over £1200 (less in most recent letter) which I can only assume is an interest error. They do not explain why the earlier letter had a different amount

 

In their letter of 12 May 2010 they state interest as

 

Clients contractual interest rate at 12% as opposed to statutory interest (which I assume is 8%) as referred to in their letter today and why they say the SAR request is irrelelevant

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crikey, this interest business is complex and beyond me. However... HFO normally says it charges 12% contractually. This means they probably don't have T&Cs or even an agreement (which is why we've gone for the SARs). I'm thinking we must find a way to get this set aside and stuff them that way.

 

The big problem is dealing with the fact that a judgment and CO is in place; we need to look for errors in their processes. There usually are some.

 

In whose name was the CO, and do you have a copy of the original judgment/claim details?

 

We need to clarify:

1) Which company claimed to own the account (ie, was there ever a NoA claiming this?).

2) Which company issued the claim form.

3) Which company has the CO.

 

If they're not all the same, it's grounds for set aside. Broken Arrow won on this. This is why seeing all the official documents is so important, and hence the SARs etc. Get to work!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both claims and the charging order came from HFO Ownership I guess can only be confirmed by the SARs assuming they respond?

 

The order is in my name ( property jointly owned ) though this is recognised in the order

 

How do I deal with TR in the interim (7 days) send a financial statement (rather than completed their provided form) with an offer of what I can afford to pay

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, rereading, we know the CO is for HFO Services.

 

Who issued the original claim form?

 

Did you ever get a Notice of Assignment from HFO? If so, what did it say?

 

The likelihood of their forcing a sale is remote, as it is jointly owned - I'm not sure if that should have been a problem in the first place when they applied for the CO. Also, I guess your ex-partner is still living there?

 

Need some experts on COs and interest to help.

 

I feel uneasy about their first claiming 12%, then backtracking to 8%. Also, check their interest charges - SI is 8% simple, not compound.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both claims and the charging order came from HFO Ownership I guess can only be confirmed by the SARs assuming they respond?

 

The order is in my name ( property jointly owned ) though this is recognised in the order

 

How do I deal with TR in the interim (7 days) send a financial statement (rather than completed their provided form) with an offer of what I can afford to pay

 

HFO Ownership? What is that? It should be HFO Services or HFO Capital.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, rereading, we know the CO is for HFO Services.

 

Who issued the original claim form? HFO Services

 

Did you ever get a Notice of Assignment from HFO? If so, what did it say?

Dont have copy but cant remember either way to be honest

 

The likelihood of their forcing a sale is remote, as it is jointly owned - I'm not sure if that should have been a problem in the first place when they applied for the CO. Also, I guess your ex-partner is still living there?

Yes

 

Need some experts on COs and interest to help.

 

Agreed

 

I feel uneasy about their first claiming 12%, then backtracking to 8%.

I think theyve realsied mistake when saying they are claiming statutory after I'd applied for the SAR as if contractual they couldn't have said my SAR was of no relevance - but then I'm guessing of course

 

Also, check their interest charges - SI is 8% simple, not compound.

 

How do I calculate ?

 

 

see above

Link to post
Share on other sites

Judgment balance x .08 gives the annual interest. Divide by 365 for the daily interest. With SI, the principal sum never changes - they can't charge interest on the interest.

 

I reckon they're asking for at least £400 to much. They can't add any other charges, I don't think, unless you have to pay the costs of the CO hearing.

 

Yet I note that in Aug 09, they demanded less than the original judgment balance?

 

What planet are they on?

 

Have they sent you the obligatory annual statements, by the way?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be tempted, if I were you, to enter an I&E that shows £1.50 a month available. If they don't accept that, they're stuffed. But you are not obliged to send one - only a court can order you too. It would stall them until we get the SAR stuff.

 

Did you ever call Barclaycard and ask exactly who and when it was sold to? Sorry if you've already posted the answer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I havent spoken to them? Should I do this now or wait on the SAR?

 

Why would they be stuffed if not accepting £1.50 per month, they've repeatedly refused £5.00 i assume this wouldnt enable the interest to be frozen.

 

In their most recent letter they suggest that my finances will have improved over the last 4-5 years, though they know this isnt the case from offers as recently as last August - arguably they are worse due to inflation and CSA arrears

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's £1 a month available, that's all they can have. A court would not order more if you don't have it.

 

Yes, call Barclaycard. Exact company sold to, exact date. Your has to be one of the earliest accounts ever bought buy HFO (or whoever...), so this will be interesting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers - I'll get in touch with them tomorrow and post what I get back

 

Wondering if my reply to TR should be to query what they are saying the interests rates are rather than a I&E statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, great idea. Time to feck them over with a request for clarity.

 

Ask why they previously claimed 12% interest, which they did in writing.

 

Ask on what basis they made this claim.

 

Ask them to clarify exactly the rate they are charging and why.

 

And look for any other indiscrepancies you want clarification on.

 

Also, have they sent you annual statements? Naughty if they haven't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good I'll do that over the weekend within the seven days

 

I've not had any anual statements either, only a couple of lettes from TR nothing from HFO

 

Can someone clarify the statutory rate please is it 8% %

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again

 

I've had anual statements from other creditors where there has been a judegement.

 

Just to be clear their court claim was for interest at 8% it was their letters showing current balance from Aug last year and May this that showed it at 12% -

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bingo!

 

From an article by law company Mckielty Brown & Smith:

 

Ensuring the consumer is better informed – information sheets

 

The Bill also aims to improve the information given to consumers at the time of entering credit agreements and throughout the life of the agreement. The OFT will have to publish information sheets for debtors about arrears and default. The information sheets will set out information about the legal consequences for the consumer, debt management options and contact details of advice providers.

 

Creditors will also be obliged to provide consumers with annual statements in a specified form with specific information about their credit agreements.

 

The Bill obliges creditors to issue annual statements to consumers. Failure to do so means that the creditor is not entitled to enforce the agreement during the period of non-compliance. Further, the debtor is not obliged to pay interest either during this period.

 

Creditors will also have to provide regular statements for consumers who go into arrears or are liable to default on payments. The Bill imposes on lenders an obligation to issue an arrears information sheet with a notice of sums in arrears. If the consumer defaults, the creditor must also issue a default information sheet along with a default notice.

 

 

This is an article in reference to amendments to the CCA. Wonder if this applies when a judgment is already in place, though? Can anyone help here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is interesting I spoke to Barclaycard this morning and they have told me the debt was originally sold to Roxborough (apparently now HFO Svcs) on 27th Jan 2006 - would there have had to be a new assignment to HFO from Roxborough seeing as everything else in HFO name CCJ, Charging Order?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...